The Regavim movement responded to the rejection of the sixth petition on the Khan Al-Ahmar eviction case:
“This decision's impact goes far beyond this particular illegal Palestinian outpost. This most recent High Court decision illustrates that in today’s judicial system, some are more equal than others. In similar petitions, when the state claimed “political considerations,” such as in the Amona, Netiv Ha’Avot and Migron cases, the High Court refused to accept arguments involving political consideration, and required the state to enforce the law and carry out demolitions. In those cases, the Court explicitly stated that there is no place for considerations of this kind in cases involving enforcement of planning and construction laws."
"The state’s capitulation to international pressure, and today’s High Court of Justice decision granting that capitulation a seal of approval, are leading the State of Israel to the brink of anarchy: The ground rules for Israeli retreat have been laid, and foreign concerns now have official confirmation that the Israeli government will back down from its own stated policies and national interests when pressure is applied. The current terminology for today’s decision is, “Shame!” - shame on the government of Israel and shame on the High Court of Justice."