On November 11, 2003, the US Senate passed the Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act by a vote of 89 to 4, aimed at imposing diplomatic and economic sanctions on Syria for its support of terrorism and its ongoing occupation of neighboring Lebanon. The state-controlled Syrian press, along with the Syrian-monitored Lebanese press, was demonstratively dismissive of the American legislative development.



The Syrian prime minister, Naji Otari, pointed out the absurd in the recent appointment of the new American ambassador, Margaret Scooby, to his country after the US Congress adopted the Syrian Accountability Act. SANA, Syria’s news agency, quoted Otari as saying that the appointment was indicative of “deceptive accusations made by the US administration against Syria” and of a disunified American government.



Regarding the substance of US accusations that Syria is a terror-supporting state, Otari said, “Syria has suffered a lot of terrorism and called for an international conference to recognize terrorism and to distinguish it from legitimate resistance against occupation, and that the US known well that its accusations against Syria are untrue, the same does the international community.” He noted that the US shot down a Syrian initiative to ban weapons of mass destruction from the Middle East, “because Israel owns 200 nuclear warheads.”

Shortly after the Senate vote, the Damascus newspaper Tishrin blamed the overwhelming US congressional support for the Syria Accountability Act on “pressure from Israel’s lobby in the United States and... the total failure of US plans in Iraq....” Noting the many measures - including restricting US exports and business investment in Syria to downgrading Washington’s diplomatic representation and freezing Syria’s assets in the US - the newspaper commented, “The list appears long, but with a trade-exchange of a measly $300 million a year, with almost no exports of US dual-use technology, no Syrian assets in US banks and given the fact that Syrian Airlines do not use US airspace, the legislation will only add political pressure.” Furthermore, the Tishrin editorial continued, Syria has accustomed herself to surviving without economic ties with the US, even though the state “has never abandoned the hope of better relations with the American people.”



Echoing the Syrian press, a columnist in Lebanon’s A-Safir newspaper, Sateh Nouriddine, wrote, “Judging by the overwhelming support the act received in the Senate one could draw the conclusion that relations between Washington and Damascus have reached a point of no return. But this may not necessarily be true.” Nouriddine noted that, even though Washington told Damascus to keep a firm hold on Syria-based terrorist organizations, “both Damascus and Washington know that Syria cannot exert much pressure on the Palestinians, because they are part of an unresolved regional problem.” All Syria can do, according to the A-Safir article, is prevent terrorist leaders in Syria from appearing on Al-Jazeera and making threats against Israel and Washington. That being the case, the Lebanese columnist intimated, America is likely to understand the ineffectiveness of the new legislation.