“Can there be anyone lower and filthier than Ariel Sharon?” Jihad’s answer? “Daniel Pipes, a radical Zionist who supports Sharon whenever possible.” The columnist’s wrath, he explains, was brought to the fore by US President George W. Bush’s appointment of Professor Pipes to the board of the US Institute of Peace.
Calling him a “sick American-Jew”, the columnist writes that Daniel Pipes “serves peace as much as Mother Theresa served the high jump in the Olympic games...” Pipes, according to al-Khazen, is a racist war advocate...” with a history of “activities against the Arabs and Muslims....” The al-Hayat columnist places Professor Pipes in “a long dynasty of Zionists who imitated the Nazis in their racism, starting with Jabotinsky, who said that no peace shall reign unless the Arabs are psychologically, not only militarily, oppressed, not to mention Ben Gurion who wrote in 1936 that the rise of Israel necessitated the total despair of Arabs, and last but not least, there is Pipes.”
As support for his statements, the former newspaper editor alleges that Daniel Pipes “believes there is no reason to negotiate the right of return [for Arabs to Israel]. Moreover, he is demanding a complete Israeli military victory and a total Palestinian defeat....” In response to the latter example, the al-Hayat columnist writes that it is “an opinion that I won't argue with, but will settle with spitting in Pipes' face.”
Al-Khazen states that Pipes’ alleged racism should not be countered with what the columnist considers comparable racism against American Jews: “There is nothing easier than facing racism with racism, as any Muslim can say that there are six million American Jews who support Israel, and not only the U.S, and hence should be supervised in case they work in the army, or the security bodies or the diplomatic corps, as they might be spying for a foreign country, which would threaten the American interests in the Middle East and the entire Muslim countries. However, such racist talk is unacceptable, as a mistake or a crime does not justify another mistake or crime.”
Of course, this very month, Jihad al-Khazen wrote of Harvard University as being “quasi-occupied due to the presence of Jews in its administration, academic body and students... Europeans,” he noted, “are more free and far from this ‘occupation’.” Similarly, in another piece, al-Khazen wrote of Congressman Tom DeLay “as Israeli in his pockets, as many American legislators sold their souls and nation to the Jewish lobby. They support a criminal Nazi country that left the U.S. with no true friend among 1,200 million Arabs and Muslims in exchange for American-Jewish donations for their electoral campaigns....”
Asking, “How did President Bush think of nominating such a lecherous to become a member of a peace institute?” al-Khazen answers, “the parties supporting this radical racist, such as the Christian alliance, or the Zionist Christian groups, which supported [Bush’s] nomination, and so did the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee, AIPAC, otherwise known as the Jewish lobby, not to mention the Jewish-American convention and the American Zionist Organization. People like Frank Gaffney, a neo-conservative, or member of the Israeli gang I wrote about a couple of months ago, also backed Pipe's nomination.”
Calling him a “sick American-Jew”, the columnist writes that Daniel Pipes “serves peace as much as Mother Theresa served the high jump in the Olympic games...” Pipes, according to al-Khazen, is a racist war advocate...” with a history of “activities against the Arabs and Muslims....” The al-Hayat columnist places Professor Pipes in “a long dynasty of Zionists who imitated the Nazis in their racism, starting with Jabotinsky, who said that no peace shall reign unless the Arabs are psychologically, not only militarily, oppressed, not to mention Ben Gurion who wrote in 1936 that the rise of Israel necessitated the total despair of Arabs, and last but not least, there is Pipes.”
As support for his statements, the former newspaper editor alleges that Daniel Pipes “believes there is no reason to negotiate the right of return [for Arabs to Israel]. Moreover, he is demanding a complete Israeli military victory and a total Palestinian defeat....” In response to the latter example, the al-Hayat columnist writes that it is “an opinion that I won't argue with, but will settle with spitting in Pipes' face.”
Al-Khazen states that Pipes’ alleged racism should not be countered with what the columnist considers comparable racism against American Jews: “There is nothing easier than facing racism with racism, as any Muslim can say that there are six million American Jews who support Israel, and not only the U.S, and hence should be supervised in case they work in the army, or the security bodies or the diplomatic corps, as they might be spying for a foreign country, which would threaten the American interests in the Middle East and the entire Muslim countries. However, such racist talk is unacceptable, as a mistake or a crime does not justify another mistake or crime.”
Of course, this very month, Jihad al-Khazen wrote of Harvard University as being “quasi-occupied due to the presence of Jews in its administration, academic body and students... Europeans,” he noted, “are more free and far from this ‘occupation’.” Similarly, in another piece, al-Khazen wrote of Congressman Tom DeLay “as Israeli in his pockets, as many American legislators sold their souls and nation to the Jewish lobby. They support a criminal Nazi country that left the U.S. with no true friend among 1,200 million Arabs and Muslims in exchange for American-Jewish donations for their electoral campaigns....”
Asking, “How did President Bush think of nominating such a lecherous to become a member of a peace institute?” al-Khazen answers, “the parties supporting this radical racist, such as the Christian alliance, or the Zionist Christian groups, which supported [Bush’s] nomination, and so did the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee, AIPAC, otherwise known as the Jewish lobby, not to mention the Jewish-American convention and the American Zionist Organization. People like Frank Gaffney, a neo-conservative, or member of the Israeli gang I wrote about a couple of months ago, also backed Pipe's nomination.”