Overwhelming Tragedy
An individual possesses the ability to grasp the short range significance of events and to understand those aspects which affect his own personal life. After enough time has passed, one is able to analyze properly what has befallen him.
When a massive, sweeping event occurs - a tragedy so overwhelming that the mere thought of it causes one to recoil in horror - one must not lose sight of the fact that the world possesses a Creator and provider, and that, as dreadful and terrifying as things might seem to be, there is pattern and purpose in the world's development.
When tragedy befalls an individual - the death of a loved one, for example - the feeling is so painful and so sharp that, at first, one is unable to bear it. One lacks the strength to confront what has happened to him, "forgets" the event, attempting to divert his attention from it. Thoughts attempt to comprehend the tragedy, yet are forced to recoil, for it is beyond contemplation. It is simply too difficult.
Only after some time has passed - after one has adjusted somewhat to the pain - does a person begin to accustom himself to what has happened, to internalize the experience and to consider it at greater depth. This process acts as a sort of defense mechanism preventing one from facing the experience before possessing the necessary strength for the true confrontation, as difficult as it may be, to begin.
All this holds true with the 'Shoah' (Holocaust). It appears that we have not yet reached the stage at which we can attempt to understand what happened, as much as we may desire to earnestly understand it. True, constant emphasis is placed upon the importance of being "informed" about the Holocaust and recalling what befell us, and perhaps for a portion of the public this is necessary.
Yet, my experience with the public leads me to believe that the Holocaust was so enormous and so painful that true reflection implies nothing less than crying. It is simply impossible to sit and listen to all of the recollections which are broadcast on Holocaust Day without crying. Such a horrifying tragedy - our own flesh and blood. We ourselves were murdered along with the six million. The deaths of the Holocaust confront us in such monstrous proportions that the mind is overwhelmed. Therefore, it is impossible to consider the 'Shoah' without tears. We are still unable to give it proper meaning.
Rabbi Teichtal: The End of an Era
Rabbi Tzvi Yehudah Kook used to point to the fact that Rabbi Yisachar Shlomo Teichtal, hy"d, the author of "Em HaBanim Semechah," reached the conclusion that the Holocaust came about because Jews did not immigrate to Israel. Rabbi Kook did not present this opinion as the final word on the subject. He made it clear that it was the opinion of Rabbi Teichtalm who was there in the midst of the 'Shoah' and whose death served as a sanctification of God's name, and was therefore permitted to say such things. We, who were not there, are not permitted to claim to know the reason for the Holocaust.
Many ask, "How is it possible that the Almighty allowed such a terrible calamity to befall His people? How is it possible that such a thing could have happened?"
We might answer this question with one from an entirely different starting point: How is it possible that such an event did not befall the Jewish people earlier? After all, throughout the generations the nations expressed their hatred for the Jews in such a sharp manner, portraying the Jews as leaders of a world conspiracy and the murderers of God.
The survival of the Jewish people in the Exile was no doubt a phenomenon which defied the laws of nature, a miracle, for "were it not for the fear of God," say the Sages, "how is it possible for one nation survive among the nations?" (Yoma 69b). As long as we managed to survive among the nations, the miracle persisted - the miraculous phenomenon of one lamb, which, despite being surrounded by seventy wolves, is not torn to pieces. Thus, even when one king enacted difficult decrees, the possibility remained to flee to a neighboring kingdom which was willing to show favor upon the Jews, so that the People of Israel were never completely erased.
With the arrival of the 'Shoah', the miracle of Jewish survival in the Exile came to an end, and the force which protected us because of our task in the Exile -- the "elevation of sparks", or the clarification of the minute details of the Torah -- stopped functioning, and with its disappearance, persecution and destruction on a scale previously unknown began.
Rabbi Kook: Time for Action
It is possible to discern such a concept in the writings of Rabbi Avraham Yitzchak Kook. In his book "Orot", Rabbi Kook explains that when the Judaism of the Diaspora is detached from that of the Land of Israel, its strength weakens. All of Exilic Judaism's strength derives from its desire to come to Israel - a desire which in the past, because of factors beyond its control, could not be realized. This longing had no choice but to find alternate ways of expressing itself, on a restricted and individual level.
The moment that the barriers were removed, the gates opened, and the possibility to immigrate granted - the life force which sustained Judaism in the Exile, ceased to function. It was no longer enough to talk about Israel - the time for action had come. The miracle ended.
Even in the case of Jews who managed to escape death in Europe, fleeing to other countries - America for example - their plight and that of the generations which followed deteriorated with the passage of time. This, despite the fact that numerous Torah scholars fled to America; despite the fact that observant Jews reached her shores in larger numbers than those who reached the shores of Israel.
Today it is possible to see quite clearly that Yeshivas (rabbinic academies) in the United States are not able to reach the level of an average Yeshiva in Israel. The fact of the matter is that today American students are sent to Israel to study Torah despite the fact that initially there were greater numbers of observant Jews there. What's more, assimilation has reached such frightening numbers in the United States that it is referred to as the "quiet Holocaust."
In light of all this it is possible to say with some certainty that the miracle of the survival of Jews in the Exile came to an end some sixty years ago, and this found expression in a number of ways: the 'Shoah', the decline of the spiritual level in the Diaspora, and the unprecedented assimilation there.
Not "Why?" but "For what purpose?"
The main lesson to be learned from the above words of Rabbi Tzvi Yehudah is that the Holocaust was not a chance event; God presides over the world, and we, for our part, fall short of understanding everything that transpires therein. Simply put, we have not yet reached a level which makes it possible to grasp the Holocaust, to study the Holocaust and to understand it, to ask the so-pressing question, "why?"
This is generally the initial response of one who experiences a tragedy - to ask, "Why did this happen to me?" But, in truth, it is impossible to deal with experiences of this scope in such a manner. The question "Why?" is not relevant, at least not initially. And even if there is an answer - and there is one - it is impossible to understand it in the midst of the storm of emotions that continues to rage. It is deeper than man's intellect.
To such a person we say, "Do not ask 'Why?' but, 'For what purpose did this tragedy occur?'" When something devastating happens we are called upon to learn a lesson from it about ourselves. "When a person experiences hardships, he should examine his actions" (Berakhoth 5a). This is the real question: What can be gathered from the tragic event? And when an individual discovers how to learn from what happens to him - to improve, to ascend - he arrives at a level which allows him to understand "why" it happened. Now, as a result of the energy he has invested on account of the push that the tragedy gave him, his point of view is altogether different. Now he understands that these deaths were not "deaths" as such, but rather, life; death, through which we received life.
"A generation comes, and a generation goes..." Every generation, after it has provided its share, must make room for that which follows, for, were this not the case, life would be stagnant; history would come to a halt. Therefore, we bear the duty to continue and to advance, to ascend one more level in relation to the preceding generations. And even if our progress is insignificant in comparison to what the previous generation achieved, our donation is nonetheless important. If we were worthy we would be able to see the complete and all-encompassing picture, but, since this is not the case, we must gather together all of the individual pieces, generation after generation; therefore, the following generation is also necessary. This type of explanation can be given when one looks at things from a distance, with an all-encompassing view of history.
Regarding advice for an individual who is suffering from either personal or national trauma, one must remember that tragedy is not punishment. People generally fear Divine punishment for their actions. This is what is known as "reverence of God's punishment." While this is a correct notion, it is not the most desirable approach.
The healthiest approach is that which calls for "reverence of God's majesty," and this should be seen as the fundamental approach. Things happen in order that we are able to learn from them. Sometimes the learning process is of a speedy nature, via ones intellect and consciousness. Sometimes a person merits internalizing the lesson, and understanding with the help of his own intellect why all of this has happened, and how, in a very real sense, through these painful deaths, additional life was created.
Yet, even if it takes some time to understand such things, one necessarily matures as a result of the tragedy he has been exposed to - even if he is not aware of it. It takes root in his heart and will be handed down to future generations.
Such a person may perhaps not have previously been on the sort of spiritual level which would have made his actions deserving of such serious scrutiny. Having ascended to a higher spiritual level, hardships have come upon him. This has happened in order that, as a result, he is caused to reflect upon his behavior, and hence, continue to grow. This, is the true meaning of examining one's actions.
It is not the sort of analysis which is aimed at uncovering the underlying cause of the tragedy, leading one to moan about not having been awakened to it in time so as to be spared of the wrath of God. Examining one's deeds should be done in a constructive manner, with an eye to the future in an attempt to decide in which manner to advance. By adopting such a philosophy one changes his way of viewing hardships; his approach to them and to God becomes completely different - mature, more positive, and joyful. When a person manages to advance as a result of what happens to him in life, his adversities become hardships with a lesson, and hardships of love, the kind that involve no interruption of Torah study or prayer.
This approach is, on the whole, applicable to any sort of tragedy. It is also true regarding the Holocaust: The most important question is not "why" it happened but "what" can we gain from its having happened? What lesson can we learn from it insofar as our own lives are concerned? To what sort of new plane are we being called upon to lift ourselves as a result of it?
We are familiar with the common claim that it is difficult to imagine the State of Israel having come into existence without the Holocaust. I once mentioned this in a talk I gave on the Holocaust. Afterward, an old man who had lost his entire family in the Holocaust approached me and asked, "Is the State really worth all of those who died? After all, our State lacks the sort of Jews who were killed in the Holocaust." He continued to ask me, weeping, "Do you even know what sorts of Jews were killed in the Holocaust? So pious, so holy – it is impossible to describe!"
True, comparing the punishment of the Holocaust with what came in its wake - the State of Israel - does not always appear "fair," and the old man was to a large degree justified in his claims. In some of the towns where Jews resided there were literally masses of pious and holy Jews, genuine Torah scholars. In Poland and Galicia. In the city of Warsaw alone there were a million Jews! This even exceeds the amount of Jews who live in Jerusalem today. In smaller towns, like Bialystok, there were 150,000 Jews. In Boisk there were 50,000 Jews. And there were many similar towns which were not considered particularly large. Is it possible to even think about forfeiting all this for the State of Israel with all of its problems?
Indeed, when one looks at the "why" - the reason - it is difficult to accept that these millions of Jews had to die for the sake of the birth of the State of Israel. But when one considers to what end, toward what goal the Holocaust was meant to propel us, it is possible to accept such a viewpoint.
Everybody acknowledges that the Holocaust shook the Jewish world to its very foundations. The question of Jewish identity changed completely after the Holocaust. Every Jew, no matter how religious, became a living sanctification of God in the world as a result of his very existence. The intention had been to wipe out the entire nation, every one of us, regardless of religiosity.
If prior to the Holocaust it had been widely accepted that only observant Jews were capable of sanctifying God, today it is clear that the very survival of the Jew as a Jew is regarded as an act of sanctification. The Lubavitcher Rebbe zt"l has written words to this effect as has Rabbi Chaim Drukhman: "Every Jew is an expression of the immutability of Israel." This is without a doubt a completely new level of understanding with regard to Jewish identity.
In a more general sense, a revolution in Jewish consciousness was affected, and every Jew, no matter where he was, began to clarify who we are as a people and what is our purpose. We must continue this process. We are still in the midst of this first stage of trauma. The more relevant question continues to be "for what purpose?" and not "why?"
The Holocaust is not a personal, individual issue. It is very difficult for a lone individual to arrive at any kind of estimate of what the Holocaust means to him personally, no matter how much time he invests considering it. It is a large, all-embracing, national issue which has left its mark on a deep inner layer of each one of us, such that even we are not always aware of it. Accordingly, it finds expression in a more general, national level, and relates to the public as a whole.
One hears important voices in the non-Jewish world making statements to the effect that the behavior of the Jewish people must be understood in light of the fact that they have a "Holocaust complex." It is easier for one who looks upon the Jews from the outside to sense that something in us changed as a result of the Holocaust. Yet, it is possible to discern clearly enough by examining the attitude of the public, that the concept of the Holocaust, similar to the Exodus, has been permanently etched upon the Jewish soul.
If we understand the term "redemption" to mean a spiritual world revolution of the sort which results in life being seen in an entirely different light, it is possible that the Holocaust has in fact laid the foundation for such an event. This approach can be discerned in the words of the verse, "As I live, says the Lord God, surely with a mighty hand, and with an outstretched arm, and with anger poured out, will I be king over you" (Ezekiel 20:33). It clears the path for a period of searching for something else. And though it begins in a rather harsh manner, it must nonetheless be considered a new and higher level..
And while it is true that in the Talmud we find Sages searching for the cause of Israelite bondage in Egypt, and concluding that it was the result of Abraham's having made use of Torah scholars in his war with the four kings (cf. Deuteronomy 32a), even so, neither the Torah nor the Sages present us with plain historical facts. The reason for this is that they were aiming more in the direction of answering the question: "For what purpose?" - i.e., what needed to be rectified as a result of this tragedy? Tosefoth Yom Tov's claim that the Chmelnitzki pogroms erupted because Jews made a practice of prattling about mundane affairs in the Synagogue must be understood in a similar light. What this eminent rabbi desired was for people to abandon this practice; that it should be a lesson that they gather from the tragedy - or one of the lessons, at any rate.
It is possible to understand this idea on an even deeper level if we take a look at the course of Jewish history: One thousand years ago, in the time of Rashi, Sephardic Jewry was ten times the size of Ashkenazic Jewry. Then, Ashkenazic Jewry was almost completely destroyed as a result of the Crusades; of the one- or two-hundred thousand Ashkenazic Jews, fifty thousand were ruthlessly killed.
What was the result? The result was a very strong awareness of the importance of sanctifying God's name through self-sacrifice. Within five or six hundred years the Sephardic population was only three times as large as the Ashkenazic. At the outbreak of the Chmelnitzki pogroms the number of Ashkenazic Jews had reached almost a million. Once again this Jewish community was struck by a devastating slaughter. Entire communities of pure and holy Jews were wiped out with great cruelty.
And once again, in the wake of this disaster, it became clear to just what extent the Jewish faith is a question of life or death, and to just what extent the Jews as a people were willing to sacrifice their lives for their religious convictions. This left a great imprint on the generations that followed, and within a span of no more than three hundred years, reaching up to the period just prior to the Holocaust, the Jews as a whole had swollen in number to between 15-16 million.
In retrospect, it is possible to see quite clearly how the act of sanctification of God's name through death provided a great impetus to the generations that followed, pushing them a number of levels higher. Who amongst us is really capable of coming to accurate conclusions regarding long-term effects based upon the present? We might interpret the words of the Tosafoth Yom Tov "that they not chatter in the Synagogue" to mean that they should appreciate the sanctity of the synagogue, the "miniature Holy Temple" that it is, and recognize the value of prayer.
In addition to the above, we can say that the shock of these tragic events caused a sense of added responsibility regarding the study of Torah. Because so many Jews were willing to literally give their lives for the Torah, the generations that followed felt a great desire to attain new heights of strengthened Jewish identity. Now the value of Torah study was understood, now it was clear why they hate us.
The same is true of the Holocaust only that this time we are talking about the entire Jewish people as opposed to a particular community. The Holocaust is also meant to provide added consciousness of just how much our lives as Jews must be full of meaning. We must be made aware of just how much responsibility rests on our shoulders - we who survived and carry on after the destruction of that generation.