(published in Il Giornale, April 28, 2011, translation sent to INN by the author) 

Today, as the Syrian unrest continues, we are forced to acknowledge our weakness and to measure the lies of Realpolitik. Indeed it's worth quoting President George Bush: “... the horrors of dictatorships remind us that at the end of the day, no dialogue is possible with bullies.”
 
After Rafiq Hariri's assassination in 2005, the Bush administration broke all ties with Syria; following that decision, the State Department launched and financed a wide  campaign aimed at helping secular Syrian dissidents and their projects, including an anti-Assad satellite TV. But later on Bashar Assad started his big game, playing simultaneously ‘at once the arsonist and the fireman’, just as Fouad Ajami writes.

But it's time to be honest and to admit that we - the West, the US who sent back its ambassador to Syria, the EU that called on Assad to start peaceful talks with Israel, the UN that might let him have a seat in the Human Rights Council – it's time to tell ourselves honestly that we wanted to see only 'Assad the fireman'.
 
After so many killings, America now starts talking of personal sanctions on the Assad family (not a big deal). Meantime the US ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, said something really worth mentioning: the United States can prove that among Syrian security forces, the same ones that are perpetrating mass killings of civilians, there are many Iranian emissaries.

The governments of Italy, France, United Kingdom, Germany and Spain have summoned the Syrian ambassadors and the EU is expected to gather a high ranking meeting in the coming days to discuss potential sanctions against Assad's regime. Meanwhile, another of the very few initiatives of the EU nations, i.e. a resolution in the Security Council, has been defeated by Russian, Chinese and Lebanese opposition.

But one the most interesting of all the useless reactions to the Syria slaughter is the call by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon to the Human Rights Council to take a position, while Syria is still a candidate for the vacant Libyan seat in the HRC. Ban Ki Moon, requested to express his opinion on this contradiction, answered that this is not his business.
 
Since Syria is one the four Asian countries entitled to one seat in this UN body, without a veto on the nomination, Syria could achieve its aim, while Syrians are slaughtered in the streets.

The UN should do whatever is necessary to save Syrians, reaffirming 'the responsibility to protect', the same principle that  led the UN Security Council to approve the 1973 resolution, and allowed Nato to wage war against Muammar Qaddafi. But Robert Gates, while still US Secretary of Defense, in a joint statement with his British counterpart, Liam Fox, stated that the situation in Syria is far different from that of Libya. And even though the international community has responded to Qaddafi's brutality with military means, it certainly won't do the same in confronting Assad.

This is the kind of weakness revealed by this UN indifference for democracy and human rights; the same unfortunate deviation we witnessed on massacres like Darfur and Tibet. And this tells the truth about the real reasons inspiring most of the approved Security Council resolutions: political interests. Qaddafi is a bizarre dictator, his ferocity is unquestionable but his strategic value is poor, it is not critical for our and Middle East future. And after all, when he started to shoot his own people, we certainly had to stop him.

Syria is a completely different story. This country is the core of Iranian power in the Middle East, a hub for deadly terrorist groups. Syria is the mother of Hizbullah, the father of Hamas. It borders with Israel and dreams to destroy it. It borders with Iraq and has sent there its anti-American terrorists. As a matter of fact, Syria still occupies Lebanon even though Assad withdrew his troops a few years ago, and it shares a very long border and a complicated relations with Turkey, that refuses to condemn the Syrian regime.

Bashar Assad knows that the Sunni majority of his country - where the Alawites are a tiny Shiite minority -  keeps a vivid memory of 1982 Hama massacre, where 20,000 Muslim Brothers were wiped out by Bashar's father, Hafez. The Syrian president knows that unless he succeeds in choking the protests at the very beginning, only tanks will crush a large opposition waiting for revenge.
 
Now we can expect from Assad an awful enormous carnage that we have the duty to stop. But the world concern about a possible collapse of Syria, the best friend of Iran, is much greater than the worry about the future of Libya. For that reason we wait and see, while Syrians keep being killed.

Because of our fear of Iran, looking at Bashar Assad in recent years, we have chosen to see a beanpole fellow wearing well-tailored British suits, a middle-class faced boy with a charming wife, instead of the professional butcher who has already decreed the killings of more of 500 of his citizens,  using his brother Maher who commands the Presidential Guard.

Many self made videos show us ferocious aggression even against women and children. Assad has employed tanks and warplanes against his own towns. This is what we witness, but we don’t want to face it. In the meanwhile the death toll rises.

It's time to define with moral clarity how much  the Western religion of human rights is worth. But we must do it now, before the next dictator shoots his people.
 
We gave credit to a dictator, Assad, who didn't deserve such a chance, just as no dictator has ever deserved one. He used the chance we gave him to arm terrorist groups, to build up chemical weapons and a powerful army. And today, he is using that to crush his own people.