Trump calls out Dominion election software

Meanwhile, Michigan State Senate demands recount. Cyber-security consultant: 'Biden is not President-elect. This is media fiction.'

Mordechai Sones ,

Trump
Trump
Reuters

President's National Security Education Board Member Sebastian Gorka says in a phone call last week he discusses Dominion election software with U.S. President Donald Trump, and read a letter penned by two Michigan State Senators demanding a recount.

Meanwhile, President Trump tweeted about the software, writing: "People are not going to stand for having this Election stolen from them by a privately owned Radical Left company, Dominion, and many other reasons!"

The election software he references was explained by cyber-security consultant Phillip Legard: "HAMR (The Hammer) was developed by the CIA under John Brennan. It was designed to allow US intelligence to manipulate the outcome of foreign elections using a number of covert electronic hacks such as Scorecard. Scorecard is a means of storing election results and it uses integers rather than whole numbers. The number 1.2 for instance will be rounded down to 1.0, whereas 1.7 will be rounded up to 2.0. The number 1.1 will also be rounded down to 1.0 and 1.6 will be rounded up to 2.0. From this simple example, it’s easy to see how totals can be skimmed and manipulated behind the scenes, and moved between candidates.

"The Hammer and Scorecard were later privatized. Dominion Systems, who are responsible for collecting the election results in all the swing States (and beyond) were one of the recipients of the privatized technology.

"How does Dominion work? Well, the basic design is pretty straightforward. There are data input terminals at the election sites. These feed into a number of ‘aggregator’ servers, which then feed up into a central database. To be secure, all of this infrastructure must be on its own, unique network.

"Except it isn’t. The Dominion systems are widely connected to the internet, allegedly for admin purposes. This is a major red flag.

"Secondly, the aggregator servers are all black box solutions. The code is proprietary and not subject to peer review. Another massive red flag. The code on the voting terminals has been shown to be shoddy and easily hackable. Many of the suggested fixes from previous elections have yet to be implemented. This is a third red flag.

"Now add the cozy relationship that exists between Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton and the Dominion Systems execs and you can see how there might be a bit of a problem."

"There was a massive data dump on Dominion on the dark web last night, and the nerds are still picking through it. Cursory analysis suggests that the aggregator servers are able to be accessed and the data they contain manipulated in real-time. However, because Trump was able to muster his voting base in huge numbers, the initial algorithms that were deployed were not up to the job. There were too many Republican votes. They couldn’t be switched without it being obvious. That’s why we saw voting pause in the middle of night. A new set of code had to be dumped ASAP to the aggregator servers, or Trump was going to win. The numbers were still too big though and what was done is glaringly obvious to anyone who’s a forensic investigator (see my posts from yesterday). It also looks like CNN and others were granted access to the aggregator servers in real-time, so they were seeing the raw voter figures before they were manipulated and before the election officials saw them. This is serious stuff, because it means that the MSM knowingly lied about the election results. They were in on the theft as it happened. System access across the board was disguised using PornHub accounts and betting shop accounts Hundreds were created. Twice during CNN’s live updates, a PornHub tab was accidentally shown. This is why."

He continues: "Electronic rigging is just one part of a bigger puzzle. There was also massive fraud with printed ballots. A lot of this has already been picked up by the State auditors. For instance, if you need to add 120,000 votes for Biden, you also need to change the number of registered voters. Compare and contrast spreadsheets that were logged at the end of each day, and when the registered voters total changes day on day, fraud is taking place.

"At the moment, Biden is not the President-elect. This is media fiction. The fraud as described is still a crime in progress. It’s only when Biden declares himself the winner that a crime has taken place. I have no idea of the timescales involved, but I am confident that just as the Dems had 4 years to plan stealing an election so Trump had 4 years to plan how to defend against a stolen election. If he’d stopped the crime in progress and allowed himself to win the election, it would all happen again. By moving in once the election has been stolen, with cast-iron proof, he can shut the whole damn enterprise down once and for all."

"I think that what we saw on election night was a carefully crafted set of vote manipulation algorithms get blown out of the water by the sheer volume of votes for Trump," Legard continues. "Whatever values were set initially were based on the polls, which as we know favored Biden and were plain wrong. The vote-riggers panicked. They had to take the Aggregation Servers down for a few hours to deploy ‘software updates’ (i.e. modified manipulation algos) whilst at the same time searching behind the sofa for extra votes for Biden. All of these fixes to the vote rig were applied at speed and under pressure. They’ve since caught the attention of the forensics guys."



top