William A. Levinson
Muslim Leaders Declare Aim Of World Domination. Rome, London, Spain, Paris, America, ISIS
I could make out the word "Harbi," which means "Enemy." Dar-al-Harb means House of War, which means this ideology has declared open war on the entire civilized world. They threaten openly to put the Queen of England in a burqa, and the same for Kate Middleton whom they call a prostitute. They add that they will have David Cameron on his knees paying the jizya, or dhimmi tax. Somebody needs to remind the world that, at the Battle of Omdurman, Britons paid Islamists enough jizya to last them the rest of their lives. They also say they will conquer Italy, Andalusia (Spain), and even the United States. On another note, I disagree with the title "Muslim leaders," because this suggests that they represent Islam as opposed to being aberrations with no relationship to genuine Muslims. Islamist, or the qualifier "militant 'Muslim'," is better.
The problem is not limited to Europe. In the United States,
A leader for the Texas branch of the Council on American Islamic Relations has told a crowd at a rally for Islam that members of the faith really shouldn’t be bound by American law.
“If we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land,” said Mustafa Carroll, the executive director of the Dallas-Fort Worth CAIR branch, a keynote speaker as the recent rally.
The instant he or his followers try to rape a woman who does not cover her head with a sack, or rob or kill infidels, they will find out the hard way that they are not above the laws of the United States, the way a Pakistani learned the hard way that he could not beat his wife to death in a civilized country.
“The brutal and vicious assault consisted of several blows to the head with a weapon that was solid enough to split her head open,” the judge said.
“The defendant intended to cause her death. I find him guilty of murder.”
Hussain faces up to 25 years to life when he is sentenced June 16.
He is lucky that he did this in New York because Pennsylvania would give him life without parole. More to the point, however, is the fact that the Council on American Islamic Relations is 501(c)(3) tax exempt, and encouragement of followers to break the law could conceivably be cause for revocation of its exemption.
Not only is the actual conduct of illegal activities inconsistent with exemption, but the planning and sponsoring of such activities are also incompatible with charity and social welfare. Rev. Rul. 75-384 holds that an organization formed to promote world peace that planned and sponsored protest demonstrations at which members were urged to commit acts of civil disobedience did not qualify for IRC 501(c)(3) or (4) exemption. G.C.M. 36153, dated January 31, 1975, states that because planning and sponsoring illegal acts are in themselves inconsistent with charity and social welfare it is not necessary to determine whether illegal acts were, in fact, committed in connection with the resulting demonstrations or whether such a determination can be made prior to conviction of an accused. However, it is necessary to establish that the planning and sponsorship are attributable to the organization, if exemption is to be denied or revoked on this ground.
It is questionable as to whether an organization that tells its followers that their religion is a license to violate the laws of the United States should be tax-exempt. Here is the form one uses to bring activities of this nature to the attention of the Internal Revenue Service. It gets worse from here:
The Government has produced ample evidence to establish the associations of CAIR, ISNA and NAIT with HLF, the Islamic Association for Palestine (“IAP”), and with Hamas. While the Court recognizes that the evidence produced by the Government largely predates the HLF designation date, the evidence is nonetheless sufficient to show the association of these entities with HLF, IAP, and Hamas.
Although CAIR would have to provide material support (such as money or weapons) to Hamas to be guilty of material support for terrorists, serious questions can and should be raised as to whether an organization with ties to a foreign terrorist organization should be tax exempt. CAIR has, in fact, been in trouble with the IRS before, and Carroll's words could get it into trouble again. The bottom line is that the ideology--it is not a religion--known as Islamism has declared open war on the entire civilized world including the mainstream Muslim world. There can be no more tolerance for something like CAIR in 2014 than there was for the German-American Bund effective December 11, 1941.
The last ideology that talked about wiping out those it deemed inferior, and ruling the world, came with a swastika. The civilized world needs to wake up to the fact that it is now confronting something as vicious and aggressive as Nazism, and join forces to stop it before it becomes too large to stop.