News Briefs





Blog


Kislev 3, 5770, 11/20/2009

Embracing Sarah Palin



What a breath of fresh air and common sense! When in recent years has a leading American public figure made such a bold and supportive statement on behalf of the right of the Jewish people to settle their homeland?
Though she is regularly besmirched and mocked by the Left, former Republican Vice-Presidential candidate Sarah Palin is proving to be one tough cookie.

In a series of media interviews to promote her new book, Going Rogue, the former Governor of Alaska has been tackling a wide range of subjects, offering timely criticism of the Obama administration's misguided domestic and foreign policies.

But perhaps the bravest comment that she made all week had to do with Israel. Asked by Barbara Walters what she thought of Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria, here is what Palin had to say:

"I disagree with the Obama administration on that. I believe that the Jewish settlements should be allowed to be expanded upon, because that population of Israel is going to grow. More and more Jewish people will be flocking to Israel in the days and weeks and months ahead. And I don't think that the Obama administration has any right to tell Israel that the Jewish settlements cannot expand."

What a breath of fresh air and common sense! When in recent years has a leading American public figure made such a bold and supportive statement on behalf of the right of the Jewish people to settle their homeland?

It is time for America's Jews to toss aside their innate liberal leanings, and embrace Sarah Palin as a figure worthy of Jewish support. With her remarks this week, she has more than earned it.




Cheshvan 12, 5770, 10/30/2009

Dare to Dream of a Rebuilt Temple



The real extremism is not to dream of a Temple, but to attempt to silence those who do
Amid mouting tension over the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, much of the media's ire has been directed not at the Palestinians who riot at the site but rather at Jews who merely wish to visit and pray there.
Far too often, the latter are depicted as "extremist" or "fringe" simply because they seek to exercise their basic civil rights - as though that in itself constitutes an act of provocation.
What we are witnessing is a concerted effort to delegitimize and even demonize our people's most cherished dream: the longing for the Temple.
But like it or not, the longing for a rebuilt Temple is no less central to Judaism than the desire for peace or social justice.
So let's stop bad-mouthing those who want to visit or pray where our forefathers once stood.
And let's bear in mind one very important rule: The real extremism is not to dream of a Temple, but to attempt to silence those who do.

Dare to Dream of a Rebuilt Temple

By Michael Freund

Something astonishing, even alarming, is taking place in the battle over the future of Jerusalem.

Even as Palestinian rioters run amok on the Temple Mount, egged on by the radicals of the Islamic Movement, much of the anger and dismay in the Israeli and international press is being directed, ironically enough, at Jews who merely wish to visit the site.

Mustering all the righteous indignation at their disposal, the media have been filled in recent days with all kinds of pejoratives to describe them, ranging from "extremist" to "fringe" to "ultra-right-wing,' as though a Jew's desire to exercise his basic, fundamental rights somehow constitutes an act of provocation.

Local pundits and commentators alike have also joined the fray, going to great lengths to justify the restrictions imposed by the police on Jews wishing to visit the Mount, even accusing the would-be pilgrims of seeking to trigger a firestorm of Islamic fury.

It does not seem to bother them one whit that the policy in place today is entirely discriminatory in nature, as the followers of Muhammad are allowed to visit and pray where Solomon's Temple once stood, but not the followers of Moses.

Indeed, all the enlightened defenders of civil rights, and the champions of equality before the law suddenly fall silent when capitulation to Muslim threats is given preference over respecting vital Jewish rights.

And why not, you might be asking. After all, if it is just a bunch of kooks who want to ascend the Mount, why go to all this trouble on their behalf?

Needless to say, this approach plays straight into the hands of our foes, whose ultimate goal is to wrestle the holy site away from us by denying its historical and spiritual connection with the Jewish people.

AND WHAT a sad and pitiful sight this is to behold. Before our very eyes, we are witnessing a concerted effort to delegitimize and even demonize our people's most cherished dream: the longing for the Temple.

The very aspiration that was born in the moments when Roman flames engulfed the Second Temple more than 1,900 years ago, and which was carried in Jewish hearts throughout centuries of exile, has now become an object of scorn, mockery and ridicule.

Make no mistake: This is nothing less than an unbridled assault on Judaism itself, and it is time for the derision and name-calling to stop.

Opine all you want about how to "solve" the Jerusalem issue, but don't belittle the place of the Temple in Jewish eschatology or belief.

Like it or not, the longing for a rebuilt Temple is no less central to Judaism than the desire for peace or social justice. And dreaming of a time when the Temple will stand again is no more fanciful or fanatical than hoping for the day when poverty and hunger will be eliminated.

Just open any prayer book and you will see what I mean.

Every day, three times a day, Jews conclude the Amida prayer, which is central to our liturgy, with the following plea: "May it be Your will, O L-rd our G-d and the G-d of our forefathers, that the Holy Temple be rebuilt, speedily in our days."

Does this mean that every Jew who prays daily is a wild-eyed extremist?

And just a few weeks ago, in the Musaf prayer recited on the festival of Succot, we implored G-d to "be compassionate to us and to Your Temple with great mercy, and rebuild it soon and magnify its glory."

Is this utterance the province merely of the "ultra-right-wing"?

The Temple and its sacrificial rites are a core component of our faith, and they play a central role in the Jewish vision of a better world. Vilifying those who uphold this belief is simply an act of small-minded intolerance and bigotry, and it has no place in the current debate.

And denying Jews the right to visit the Temple Mount is no less objectionable, for it tramples upon the principal constitutional values which underpin our democracy.

As Thomas Jefferson pointed out some two centuries ago, "The most sacred of the duties of a government is to do equal and impartial justice to all its citizens."

That means that when Palestinian Arabs try to prevent Israeli Jews from visiting the Temple Mount, it is the responsibility of the powers that be to come to the defense of the latter, rather than to capitulate to the former.

So let's stop bad-mouthing those who want to visit or pray where our forefathers once stood.

And let's bear in mind one very important rule: The real extremism is not to dream of a Temple, but to attempt to silence those who do.

--- from the October 29 Jerusalem Post

 




Tishrei 21, 5770, 10/9/2009

Obama's Ignoble Prize



Obama has done what? Given a couple of flowery speeches?
In a surprise announcement, the Noble Prize Committee declared today that it was awarding US President Barack Obama the 2009 Noble Peace Prize, despite his having been in office for a mere 8 months.

Needless to say, the announcement was met with a lot of head-scratching. After all, just what exactly has Obama accomplished to warrant such an award?

Consider the following: only two previous sitting US presidents have won a similar accolade. In 1906, Theodore Roosevelt won the Noble Peace Prize for helping to broker an end to the bloody war between Russia and Japan, while in 1919, Woodrow Wilson got it for his famous 14 Points Peace Plan and for helping to establish the League of Nations.

By contrast, Obama has done what? Given a couple of flowery speeches?

The Noble Committee has once again undermined its own reputation, as well as the cause of international peace, by giving a highly undeserving Obama this most prestigious of awards.

Whatever one thinks of Obama and his politics, there is little doubt that his first year in office has been marked by sharp disappointment and a stellar lack of achievement, as his steadily faltering poll numbers clearly attest.

If anything, the Committee should have awarded the Peace Prize to none other than George W. Bush, whose war on terror and courage in confronting militant Islamic jihadism, made him a far more worthy candidate.

 



First | 2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |36 |37 |38 |39 |40 |41 |42 |43 |44 |45 |46 |47 |48 |49 |50 |51 |52 |53 |54 |55 |56 |57 |58 |59 |60 |61 |62 |63 |64 |65 |66 |67 |68 |69 |70 |71 |72 |73 |74 |75 |76 |77 |78 |79 |80 |81 |82 |83 |84 |85 |86 |87 |88 |89 |90 |91 |92 |93 |94 |95 |96 |97 |98 |99 |100 |101 |102 |103 |104 |105 |106 |107 |108 |109 |

Fundamentally Freund

by Michael Freund
An Alternative Approach to Israeli Political Commentary
Email Me

Subscribe to this blog’s RSS feed

Michael Freund is Founder and Chairman of Shavei Israel, returning "lost Jews" to the Jewish people.
Previously, he served as Deputy Director of Communications & Policy Planning under former premier Benjamin Netanyahu.

A native of New York, he holds an MBA in Finance from Columbia University and a BA from Princeton University.
He has lived in Israel for the past decade.

Shavei Israel
For Our People's Return
www.shavei.org