He Ru Follow us: Make a7 your Homepage

      Judaism: Yitro Questions & Answers

      Published: Thursday, February 04, 2010 11:48 AM
      Three difficult questions on the contents of the Ten Commandments are answered by Rabbi Apple.


      IS IT REALLY A COMMANDMENT?

      The Ten Commandments are more famous than understood. The greatest
      difficulty for the human mind is probably Commandment Number 1. "I am
      the Lord your G-d who brought you out of the Land of Egypt, out of the
      house of bondage" (Ex. 20:2) – what sort of commandment is that?
      Belief can not be imposed or legislated.


      The fact is that it doesn't need to be a commandment at all if we go
      by the Hebrew title, "Aseret HaDib'rot" (Ten Words, Ten Principles).
      Nonetheless Maimonides includes this first statement in the list of
      commandments, though he admits that if a person believes in G-d no
      commandment is needed and if they do not believe, no commandment
      helps. Belief can not be imposed or legislated. You can order me to
      believe, but you are wasting your time unless my heart and soul have
      already freely chosen to believe.

      We can defend Maimonides, however, if we move to the second part of
      the verse. "I am the Lord your G-d" is not saying, "Believe in My
      existence", but "Believe that it was I who brought the Children of
      Israel out of Egypt". The question is not whether G-d exists – that is
      axiomatic from page 1 of the Bible – but whether He relates to His
      creation.

      The sages said that a Roman noblewoman asked, "What has your G-d been
      doing since the six days of Creation?" In other words, "Is G-d only in
      the background or does He do anything for His world?" The rabbi to
      whom she posed the question said that G-d busies Himself making
      marriages, i.e. He concerns Himself with relationships. We believe not
      just that He is, but that it is He who is in charge of the world.

      YOUR PARENTS' SINS ARE YOURS?

      Q. How can the Ten Commandments say that the Almighty is "a jealous
      God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children"? Is it
      fair that children should suffer because of the deeds of their
      parents?

      A. The sages scrutinised every word of this commandment and contrasted
      the punishment of the children of the wicked ("to the third and fourth
      generation") and the reward of the righteous ("to the thousandth
      generation"). Said Ibn Ezra: "God is patient until the fourth
      generation and only then is punishment inflicted." Tosafot HaRosh
      declares: "Until the fourth generation punishment is not imposed; God
      is waiting for repentance. But if a fourth generation persists with a
      family tradition of wickedness, they will suffer." Saadia states that
      the children, in addition to being punished for their own sins, are
      now punished for their ancestors' sins because they could have
      improved the family record but failed to do so.

      The effect of righteousness, however, has a different timetable. Here,
      the moral foundations laid by one's ancestors work for the benefit of
      future generations "to the thousandth generation", i.e. to the end of
      time. The Targum understands the phrase as "for thousands of
      generations"; the Mechilta says, "for innumerable generations". Hence,
      even though future generations have their failings, the merits of
      their ancestors weigh favourably with God.

      But the prophet Ezekiel finds this commandment difficult. "What do you
      mean," he asks, "that you use this proverb, 'The fathers have eaten
      sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge'? Use it no
      You can overcome an encumbrance from the past.

      more! The soul that sins, it shall die... The son shall not bear the
      sin of the father, neither shall the father bear the sin of the son"
      (Ezek. 18:2-3, 20). Yet Ezekiel is not rejecting the Decalogue but
      emphasizing personal responsibility: if I sin, I will suffer; if I
      suffer, let it be for my own sin. As the rabbis understand the
      Decalogue, the second commandment is saying the same thing. You do not
      suffer for the sins of your forebears unless you yourself are also
      sinful.

       

      You can overcome an encumbrance from the past. If family
      history lays questionable baggage on your back, you have the power to
      lift it off. If the family name needs to be cleansed, there is
      something you can do about it.

      PRIESTS OR PROPHETS?

      In the Bible there are two ways of being a religious leader. One can
      be a kohen, a priest concerned with rituals and practices, or a
      prophet who preaches the word of G-d.


      Today's portion defines Israel as a people of priests – "mamlechet
      kohanim v'goy kadosh" – "a kingdom of kohanim, a holy people" (Ex.
      19:6). We all minister to G-d in His sanctuary, not merely in the
      official house of worship but in the home (the “mikdash m’at”, the
      “miniature temple”), the factory, office, school and street. We have
      prayers to say, kosher laws to maintain, Sabbaths and festivals to honour.
      As prophets we belong to the world.

      Every day of the year, every stage in life has its rituals to observe.
      That might be called the particularistic dimension of Jewish identity:
      we are Jews “far zich” – “amongst ourselves”.

      From the example of Moses (Deut. 34:10) we also learn that we are a
      people of prophets with a universalistic mission amongst mankind. As
      prophets we belong to the world. Alenu, the great concluding prayer of
      every Jewish service, written by the Talmudic sage Rav in the 3rd century CE,

      sums up our two dimensions: particularism in the first paragraph, universalism
      in the second. The prophetic role begins with Judaism but is capable
      of being shared by other peoples.