The Real Agenda: Dimona

Obama has set the stage for his big prize.

Dr. Moshe Dann,

OpEds לבן ריק
לבן ריק
צילום: iStock

"I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons. That is why I strongly reaffirmed America's commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons. And any nation - including Iran - should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power if it complies with its responsibilities under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That commitment is at the core of the Treaty, and it must be kept for all who fully abide by it. And I am hopeful that all countries in the region can share in this goal." -- President Barack Hussein Obama, June 4, 2009
This paragraph sends chills through Israel's intelligence community.

As a policy statement, this means that America (or any other country) cannot deny the right of any country to Weapons of Mass Destruction. It undercuts the reasons for America's attack in Iraq, assents to nuclear proliferation and precludes any action against Iran. It also turns the focus on Israel.

Amidst all of the distortions and inaccuracies of Pres. Obama's speech in Cairo, this paragraph sends chills through Israel's intelligence community. His reference was not just to Iranian nuclear weapons, but "any nation" that has or acquires them. That includes Israel.

Obama's emphasis on a commitment to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is a direct threat to Israel's security. Israel has refused to agree to that treaty because it means opening all of its facilities to inspection - including its top secret plant in Dimona. Aware of Israel's long-standing policy in this matter, Obama shifts the attack.

By linking support for Israel against Iran with a halt to all settlement building, and establishing a second Arab Palestinian state, Obama has set the stage for his big prize: Dimona.

Aware that no Israeli government can agree to a complete freeze in building, Obama can blame Israel for American inaction against Iran and lack of support for its war in Afghanistan. It's a perfect excuse: 'Israel didn't do enough; it's Israel's fault.'

"Israeli intransigence" will be given as the reason for America's failure. 'If only Israel had evacuated more settlements, stopped building, dismantled more checkpoints, given more aid to Hamas, stopped demolishing illegal Arab buildings, etc., we could have done something,' Obama will say. 

But Obama's real agenda is not settlements; it is Israel's nuclear capacity. Egypt especially has been urging the US to force Israel to open its facility in Dimona. Prior to the Six Day War in 1967, Russian spy-planes flew over Dimona and, according to Isabella Ginor and Gideon Remez in Foxbats Over Dimona, wanted to bomb it. No doubt, Arab terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda, Hamas and Hizbullah have Dimona in their sights as well.  

The key to neutralizing Israel's nuclear capacity is the NPT. As Obama's speech clearly indicates, Israel's agreement to the NPT is the lever to gain Iranian compliance. 'How can Israel be allowed to have nuclear weapons,' Obama suggests, 'and not Iran, or any other country?'   

Unlike any other president, Obama has put Israel in a difficult, if not impossible, position. If it refuses to agree to sign the NPT, Israel will be isolated and blamed for lack of progress on Iran. If it agrees, Israel will lose a vital strategic deterrent.  

Well aware of terrorist threats to America, and concerned about investments and interests throughout the world, Obama sees pushing Israel against the wall as a convenient way of deflecting Muslim terrorism. As long as Islamists think that Obama is on their side, they'll refrain from attacking, keep the oil flowing and the prices low.
Obama's speech is an ominous warning of what he is prepared to do.

Iran may even be willing to make cosmetic (and temporary) adjustments so that Obama can claim that the crisis has been defused. And Israel will pay the price: sanctions, boycotts, and diplomatic and economic isolation similar to the international pressures that broke South Africa's apartheid regime. 

Obama's speech is an ominous warning of what he is prepared to do in order to strip Israel of its military advantage. Along with the loss of control over Judea and Samaria, territories that are vital for Israel's security and access to water reserves, faced with Arab terrorist militias backed by Arab armies, Israel will be completely vulnerable. 

The face of this jihad is not one of ranting, bearded clerics, but of smooth-talking, clean-shaven smiling apostles of peace, and the Philosopher-King of Hope.