Op-Ed: The Lie that Broke Israel's Back
Steve Apfel, South AfricaThe writer is a prolific author of novels and non-fiction, essayist and...
Israel now has a quasi-state to contend with. “A victory for the values of truth,” exclaimed Sudan’s UN diplomat after the General Assembly voted to admit Palestine as a non-member observer.
A victory for the Palestinian camp perhaps, but for truth it was a defeat of historic proportions. Recalling one thing and reaffirming another, the resolution the GA voted on was packed with lies. Most were blatant. One lie – you could say the catchphrase of the Palestinian perpetual show – enjoyed the sanctity of accepted wisdom.
“The Palestinian territory occupied since 1967” appeared, in one form or another, some dozen times in the UN resolution. Fantasy, told often enough, will merge with reality. A plot may turn into policy. This whopper of an old lie made Israel’s defeat at the UN a long time coming. One might say that it made Israel’s defeat historically inevitable.
No one in that chamber of double-dealing and double-speak battered an eye. Israel’s ambassador had eyes only for his country’s ignominious defeat. Already sold and bought forty years ago, the lie slipped into the skin of truth with scarcely a sigh.
Now you see it, now you don’t. ‘Occupied Palestinian Territory’ (OPT) is a thing of smoke and mirrors, the stuff of mumbo jumbo. Historically it never happened, legally there never was Palestinian territory for Israel to occupy. Israel took the territories from Egypt and Jordan in 1967, and there’s no getting away from that.
So today it has more right than Jordan to be occupying the "West Bank", and more right than Egypt to be occupying Gaza (if Israel’s blockade may be called occupation.) Palestine never enters the equation. Turn Middle East wars and laws upside down and any way you like, but if the territories belong to any UN member, or quasi member, they belong to Israel.
Not even the famous UN Resolution 242 can help. It told Israel to withdraw from territories once held by Jordan, illegally, and Egypt, and it envisaged their return to those two countries. Palestine never got a mention in Resolution 242. For a couple of good reasons.
Palestinians were not one of the belligerents involved in the Six-day War. Anyway, the people who were going to stake claim to a nation they would call Palestine were a year away from being born. After all, you cannot have territory for a nation before you have the nation.
More than anyone, King Hussein of Jordan understood perfectly that a cart before the horse never gets off the blocks. So he told the 1988 Arab League summit in Amman. “The appearance of a distinct Palestinian national personality comes as an answer to Israel’s claim that Palestine is Jewish.”
The Hashemite monarch was explaining to fellow potentates why a Palestinian nation had to be conceived in 1968. If it were not, then Judea, Samaria and Gaza would be Israel’s by dint of war and law. Arab armies had been vanquished in six days, and the territories lost to Israel.
That made it imperative for the PLO to revise its covenant, which it did on July 17, 1968. The PLO meddled with Article 24, erasing the old declaration that the West Bank and Gaza were not occupied, and now insisting that they were. With that sleight of hand a newborn nation came into the world. With a newborn bastard illegal occupier.
Armed with nothing but chutzpah, the PLO lost no time cementing the lie that the Jewish state had usurped the foundling’s heritage. From there to the accepted wisdom of ‘Occupied Palestinian Territories,’ took no more than a quickstep.
For all that, ‘Palestinian Arab territory occupied by Israel’ is more than a risible lie of history. It had the power to alter history. For one thing, the international community took to the idea.
For another, a goodly proportion of American, and even Israeli, Jews nailed their colours to that mast.
For a third, an economic bubble has OPT to thank. Monthly pay slips for untold hundreds of UN staffers depend on that fallacious real estate. Hundreds of NGO entities and staffers would be the poorer without it.
And remember, OPT is the article of faith on which anti-Zionists peg their zeal. Their god demands little: hate Zionism and revere OPT. Hence the daily invocations. Label products from ‘occupied territories.’ Boycott Israel and divest because of OPT.
Then there is the UN, and its dependency on OPT. Some UN organs were custom made for it – embedded OPT in their names. O
ne of those organs has a bona fide legal expert at the helm, sporting a grand title, but no salary, for he plays the part out of conviction. And what is that conviction but the creed of the anti-Zionist faithful, the ‘Israel-may-not-be-found-innocent’ creed. It’s right there in this UN lawman’s sonorous title:
Special Rapporteur to the UN Council on Human Rights on violation of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.’ Amen to that.
So Israeli crimes are pre-supposed, and the UN lawman tours a land of the UN’s own making to hunt them down.
But for the OPT whopper the world would be a different, if quieter place. And Israel with its settlement enterprise would not now be under UN – complicit threat.