Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a veteran of the Islamic Republic's repressive Revolutionary Guard, took office on August 3, 2005, after an unexpected win in a sham presidential election; there are no democratic The ruling clerics put their stamp on the elections from the very beginning by deciding who can run.
elections in the Islamic Republic of Iran. All candidates are screened by the Guardian Council before they are allowed to run for office. In practice, a president of Iran is already chosen through a farce process of giving the voters a chance to elect one of the men hand-picked from the regime's functionaries, as was the case with President Ahmadinejad.

During the previous "election" only a small percentage of the voters bothered to vote, since voting under the undemocratic system of the mullahs is more like selection than election. The result of staying away from the polls materialized in the person of the fascist Ahmadinejad.

The great majority of the people of Iran are disillusioned and even disgusted by the mediaeval, incompetent, oppressive and corrupt rule of the mullahs, irrespective of which mafia gang is in power. The votes, more than anything else, are protest ballots cast against the entire system, rather than indications of support for the so-called conservative-moderate coalition.

It took less than four years for Iranians to realize that boycotting the so-called elections in the Islamic Republic of Iran can only bring to power an even worse bunch of Islamofascists. This time around, the people turned out to vote for the lesser of two camps of evil - the mullah-dominated gang of conservatives and "moderates."

After a fiery month-long campaign, with unprecedented passions and tensions, mass rallies, polished campaign slogans, savvy Internet outreach and debates televised worldwide - which revealed rampant corruption, ineptitude, and illegal and criminal activities by all four candidates - on June 12, 2009, the Iranian people went to the polls, challenging not only the incumbent president Ahmadinejad, but the entire establishment of the Islamic regime.

Iran's elections are considered extremely unfair and the Islamist government does not allow international monitors to be present. The ruling clerics put their stamp on the elections from the very beginning by deciding who can run. It is really a joke. More than 470 people sought to join the presidential race, but only Ahmadinejad and three rivals were cleared.

However, the turnout was massive, a near-record high of 85 percent of Iran's 49.2 million eligible voters. Based on the information from Mousavi's website, a group of Interior Ministry employees have leaked out the following results, which seem to be closer to reality than those released by the establishment:

Participated in the election: 75% to 85%
Total boycotted the election: 20% to 30%
Mir Hussein Mousavi: 45%
Mehdi Karoobi: 33%
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 13%
Mohsen Rezai: 9%
Cancelled votes: 3%

It is clear that Mr. Mir Hussein Mousavi won the election by a large margin. Ahmadinejad came in third. But in the wake of the Islamic election (selection) something happened. Something beyond what anyone could have ever Mousavi won the election by a large margin. Ahmadinejad came in third.
imagined. Something huge. A daylight coup d'etat by elements of the establishment, particularly the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).The clerical leadership in Iran has grown increasingly reliant on the IRGC to help it stave off internal pressure for political and economic reform, and external pressure resulting from international concern over Iran's nuclear program.

An Iranian journalist said, "The important event that took place in Iran is that it wasn't an election; it was a coup d'etat. [They] stole 24 million votes of the nation and took them away for themselves. If there were really a winner, they would have to celebrate, but instead they beat people. They performed a coup, but they don't call it a coup."

He continued, "Please don't use the word 'fraud' because it is mitigation of what has happened in Iran. Fraud is what was happening in the past 30 years. This is not fraud. They haven't [counted] people's votes. Using the word fraud is like calling a deep cut a small scratch. There was no fraud; it was a coup."

What the so-called reformists call a coup was described as a great achievement by the Islamic Republic's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the man who has the final say in all affairs of the country. It was no secret by that Ahmadinejad was Khamenei's favorite choice. If an electoral fraud, tantamount to a coup, had indeed happened, then everyone believes that it certainly had Khamenei's blessing.

Demonstrators were shocked and angry by Khamenei's disregard for their vote and the apparent coup. "If Mr. Khamenei cannot tolerate even a mild-mannered president like Mousavi, then I really don't know what to do," said a demonstrator, who was among thousands of students on Pahlavi Avenue, before she started to chant "Death to the dictator". The day after the election, Khamenei urged the nation to unite behind Ahmadinejad and called the result a "divine assessment."

The political chief of the powerful Revolutionary Guard warned it would crush any "revolution" against the Islamic system by Mousavi's "green movement" - the signature color of his campaign. However, on Saturday and Sunday, hundreds of thousands of opponents of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad clashed with Hizbullah thugs dressed in police uniforms in the heart of Iran's capital, pelting them with rocks and setting fires in the worst unrest in Tehran since the 1979 Islamic revolution.

The ever-conniving mullahs dread the Iranian people. Granted, a small percentage of Iranians, known as the 3Fs - fools, fanatics and frauds - support the mullahs. No totalitarian rule can ever survive without a segment of the population, for one reason or another, supporting it. Yet, time is not on the side of the mullahs. By their mismanagement, thievery and oppression of the masses, they have created explosive internal conditions. The mullahs need to have the N-bomb to create a false sense of security so they can prolong their survival.

It was reported and verified by a Der Spiegel reporter in Iran that the regime has brought many Arabic-speaking Hizbullah factions from Lebanon to attack the Iranian people. Overnight Sunday, police reportedly raided student dormitories at Tehran University where some 3,000 students had earlier held an anti-Ahmadinejad rally. Rooms were damaged, computers smashed, hard drives taken, and students beaten and arrested, according to the Associated Press (AP). It is reported that five students died in the attack.The regime has imported Lebanese Hizbullah and Palestinian thugs.

The vicious attacks on people by the hired thugs of the regime are failing more and more as the mullah's instrument of rule by terror. The police and official security apparatus are less and less willing to exercise brute force to suppress the people; and that's exactly why the regime has imported Lebanese Hizbullah and Palestinian thugs.

In short, Iran is in a state of serious upheaval. Replacing Ahmadinejad with the already tried and proven wanton gang of Rafsanjani-Khatami-Mousavi is not going to change matters much. As for the West, it is prudent that it does not embark on a trigger-happy, self-interested policy. The mullahs' lease on life - short of a brutal massacre of the Iranian people in the absence of any foreign media - is just about over. Concerted political, economic and moral support for the long-suffering and valiant Iranian people and their secular opposition can put an end to the shameful and hate-driven Islamofascists of any and all stripes.