When Jihad Johnny "Comes Marching Home Again"

There is mayhem in store, not the "hearty welcome" of the famous Civil War song.

Ron Jager

OpEds Ron Jager
Ron Jager
INN:RJ

Islamic terrorist organizations received an unanticipated victory after the collapse of the Soviet Union. A short time thereafter, the Russian army unilaterally withdrew from Afghanistan, resulting in their humiliating defeat, and this war became the first "Jihad" war in modern history that attracted Muslims, mainly Sunnis, from all over the Arab world in order to join forces and participate in a modern day Jihad against the Communist enemy.

This war had been fought for almost ten years when it ended and two strategic developments had emerged. One, Arab "mercenaries" acquired and mastered advanced military skills and capabilities after years of fighting, but now that the war ended, they were "unemployed" and unwelcome in their counties of origin. Two, Arab countries and non-state Islamic terror organizations now believed that it is within their power to win a war against the “Western infidel”.

The Western alliance led by the United States supported Islamic terrorist groups in Afghanistan under the assumption that "the enemy of my enemy - is my friend" and that short- term assumption turned out to be a long term strategic blunder.

After the war in Afghanistan ended, Western countries absorbed thousands of returning "unemployed" Jihadist fighters as a mark of thanks for fighting and beating the Soviets.

This led to a scenario where well-trained Islamic terrorists, confident that they could overcome the West, were popping up throughout the entire Western world. This emerging core generation of veteran Islamic terrorists  became the "founding fathers" of today’s radical Islamist organizations, established as seemingly innocent “gate organizations” that exist until today throughout Europe and the United States. They are also responsible for the evolvement of radical terror organizations such as al Qaeda which culminated in the 9/11 terror attack.

Based upon this precedent, we are likely to witness a repetition of the above scenario in the coming years in Europe and the United States.  The war going on today in Iraq and Syria represents the ultimate Jihad between the Sunnis and the Shiites. Although they are not fighting the West directly, both sides are extremely frustrated by this situation and are constantly attempting to bring their radicalism and Islamic terror to the shores of Europe and the United States.

The “Boston Bomber” terror attack at the Boston Marathon is an example of how Islamic terror has infiltrated the United States. Today, Western countries will not purposely absorb thousands of returning "unemployed" jihadist mercenaries, but a critical mass of these terrorists will be allowed to return to their home nations by law due to their status as citizens.

Many of those lacking citizenship will manage to enter Europe and the United States due to the current political atmosphere supporting amnesty for illegal immigrants, in addition to the difficulties inherent in stopping unrestricted immigration, especially along the 2500 mile border between Mexico and the southern states of the USA. 

Terrorists who remain abroad and are do not have the “right of return”, will join efforts to attack the West by conducting low scale terror against tourists and foreign embassies, cyber-attacks and  major terror attacks through the  recruitment and directing of Islamic terrorists living in the West -similar to what transpired during 9/11. 

In recent months, the world has seen how ISIS instills fear in the hearts of civilized people by broadcasting the barbaric and savage beheading videos of innocent Americans and Europeans that continue to shock the world each time anew. According to the latest UN estimates, approximately 20,000 of the Islamic State activists are volunteers from all over the world who have joined the organization, and their numbers are increasing.

Islamic State includes volunteers from approximately 90 countries, including from Europe and North America, and also several dozen from Israel. In the near future, when Islamic State falls apart or ceases to be attractive, thousands of Western born and bred Muslims– all steeped in Jihadist ideology, with comprehensive guerrilla warfare training and extensive combat experience – will neatly pack away their black flags and return home to mom.

In response to this imminent threat, President Obama appeared recently at the UN Security Council to head a special meeting of world leaders that focused on the fight against terror and, more precisely, the fight against Islamic State. Obama presented the Security Council with a revolutionary proposal to require all the world's states to enact laws and adopt a series of measures to successfully cope with and restrict what now appears to be the most threatening aspect of the Islamic State phenomenon – that is, the foreign terrorist fighters from all around the world, coming to help the organization in the Middle East, and those who could return thereafter to their countries of origin.

Obama's proposal is premised on substantial legislative change that would allow the countries from which the volunteers are departing to stop them, to prevent them from leaving, and to prosecute those planning and preparing to set out for the Middle East. In the wake of such legislation, countries will also have an obligation to prosecute anyone and everyone who helps these fighters reach Syria and Iraq, even if the assistance amounts to nothing more than the purchasing of an air ticket.

Such a move, legal experts worldwide concur, would undoubtedly impose significant restrictions on an individual's freedom of movement. Picture this: someone wants to go "to provide humanitarian aid" to his Muslim brothers who are rebelling against the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad, and the government of Britain or France or Germany arrests, tries and jails him just because he purchased an air ticket to Turkey, from where he planned to set out.

Few know that a key partner to this initiative, as well as other revolutionary proposals announced by Obama in the same speech, was the UN Security Council’s primary anti-terror body, the Counter Terrorism Executive Directorate (CTED). The UN Security Council's anti-terror body (CTED) whose senior official is Israeli counter-terror expert Dr. David Scharia, warns of this impending danger.

"A large number of them will return home more radical," Scharia says, "with a whole lot more operational experience, with military capabilities and, no less important, with a network of ties they can maintain via technological means that were not at their disposal 10 or 15 years ago. This presents a danger the likes of which we've never seen before, something new and extremely threatening. According to our professional assessments, of the 90 countries from which volunteers have departed, more than half are in a state that we call, 'seriously affected by it' – in other words, countries that are under serious threat with the return home of those volunteers."

In today’s highly charged political environment concerning immigration reform as proposed by President Obama, the need to pass legislation to significantly curtail unrestricted amnesty to illegal immigrants will most likely be left to the Republican-controlled Congress. Due to the clear and present danger posed by returning Islamic terrorists to their home countries, this seemingly unpopular legislation can be an effective rallying call to support those legislators in both houses of Congress in limiting the unrestricted amnesty proposed by President Obama.

   




top