Over the past few days, Israeli media and blogs around the world have been chewing, regurgitating, and chewing again, a short video filmed in Hebron a few months ago. The video shows Hebron resident Yifat Alkobi yelling and cursing some of her Arab neighbors, the Abu Isha family. They live across the street from the Alokobis and the other 17 Jewish families in the Tel Rumeida neighborhood.

Of course, for the Israeli media, this kind of film is similar to a big piece of chocolate cake with cream and a cherry on top. A live portrait of the 'monsters of Hebron.' Jewish monsters, of course.

However, all those having a field day over the Yifat video have either forgotten, or never knew, or prefer to ignore a number of important facts.

1. The Tel Rumeida neighborhood, the highest Jewish neighborhood in the city, perching atop a hill, faces, to the north, the Harat A-Sheikh Hills. These hills were abandoned by Israel to the Arabs exactly ten years ago as part of the infamous Hebron Accords. All Israeli security forces were removed from Harat A-Sheikh.

When the Olso War (a.k.a. the Second Intifada) began in October 2000, on the eve of Rosh HaShanah, Tel Rumeida came under attack from those hills. Terrorists shot from there into Tel Rumeida for two years. All the caravan homes, comprised of pasted-together plasterboard walls, were hit by Arab gunfire and are full of bullet holes. One Friday afternoon, when the Alkobi's firstborn daughter Tziporah was playing outside, a terrorist lined her up in his rifle scope and fired. The bullet missed Tziporah's head by a few centimeters.

2. Just over eight years ago, an Arab terrorist penetrated the Tel Rumeida neighborhood at about 11:00 pm, entered the home of Rabbi Shlomo Ra'anan from a back window and stabbed to death the 63-year-old rabbi in his pajamas. The terrorist could not have perpetrated his attack without 'inside information' gleaned from - who else? - Arab neighborhood residents.

3. About a year and a half ago, following the expulsion of 10,000 Jews from Gush Katif and northern Samaria, a group of radically extremist Arab organizations - headed by the European Union-funded International Solidarity Movement - and joined by groups like Anarchists Against the Wall, the Christian Peacekeeping Team, Ecumenical Escorters, and with tacit support from the Temporary International Presence in Hebron (TIPH), decided to focus on Tel Rumeida. Their goal was wiping the Jewish presence there off the map. Of course, the ends justify the means: the group's participants are instructed to physically intervene against Israeli security forces: "The project will be activist-oriented. Unlike other organizations, the project work will not be 'witness'- or 'presence'-oriented.... Assertively advocate for Palestinians of Tel Rumeida - physically intervene when soldiers or settlers attack Palestinians."

These so-called activists, all foreigners, openly incite the Arabs against Israeli security forces and civilians. Their actions are overtly provocative, attempting to draw both Israeli adults, children and soldiers into violent situations, which they then selectively film, for use by media and Internet. Of course, the films are professionally edited, so as to leave out segments they clearly are not interested in being witnessed by the public at large.

So, too, with the "Alkobi video." The events leading up to the public version can be left up to your imagination.

4. A true, short story, about the family in question, the Abu Isha clan (which has been transformed by ISM, et al. into the Hebron media PR family of the neighborhood). A number of years ago, one of the Jewish Tel Rumeida families had a broken piece of furniture. Their across-the-street neighbor, Mr. Abu-Isha, was a carpenter and, very naturally, they brought their broken chair to him to be fixed. When he completed the work and they asked the cost, he replied, "I don't take money from neighbors." It seemed that the days of the Messiah arrived; children from both families began playing together - Jewish and Arab children playing in Hebron.

One day, as happens with children all over the world, the kids had a fight and this one went home crying and that one went home crying. A little while later, the Jewish woman heard someone knocking at her door. When she opened it, one of the Abu-Isha clan stood there and started screaming at her. (Did you see it on the Internet?) After a little while, he turned around and went home.

Shortly afterwards, a soldier stationed in the neighborhood approached the woman and asked her if she wanted to issue a complaint against the man who had screamed at her. She responded that she didn't understand Arabic and she had no idea what he had said.

The soldier replied, "I understand Arabic. He said he was going to come back with a knife and kill all of you." Needless to say, the kids stopped playing together.

In conclusion, it is also important to try and keep events in proportion to their actual significance. For example, yesterday I read in an Israeli Internet news site about a man who murdered someone because of an argument between two dogs. One dog bothered another dog in a coffee house in Haifa and, as a result, a man was stabbed in the heart and killed. The murderer was convicted and sentenced to eighteen years in prison, but appealed the harshness of the punishment. Israel's illustrious Supreme Court accepted the appeal and reduced the sentence by three years, leaving the killer in jail for fifteen years. As Israeli punishment goes, I expect he'll be out after ten.

Did you know anything about this story? Which seems to be more significant: a Jewish woman yelling at an Arab woman, or a man who was convicted of killing another man because of a dog, and whose jail sentence was reduced due to its extreme severity?

And finally: What really happened? What's shown in the video? A woman yelling at another woman. Now, let me ask you, when was the last time you yelled at someone - a co-worker, a spouse, a child? Hand on your heart. Did you ever have a dispute with a neighbor and 'let go'? Did it make international news headlines?

On Israeli news - Voice of Israel headline news - one of the reports said that Yifat Alkobi from Hebron has been ordered by police to submit to interrogation. If she doesn't appear, then an arrest warrant will be issued. This is headline news? Only because it's an Arab and a Jew in Hebron.

Yifat didn't take a gun into their house and shoot anyone; she didn't go inside and turn the house inside out. She yelled at an Arab woman. Maybe her choice of words was 'undesirable,' but believe me, I've heard worse. And - great confessions - even I've lost it at times and used some pretty coarse language. I know a few righteous people who've never used such words, but not too many of them.

Again, the difference is Jews and Arabs in Hebron, incitement, provocations and a well-placed video camera. And, of course, a firm target: let's get the Jews out of Tel Rumeida.

In reality, that's the whole story. So you tell me: Who's to blame?