
 sRepliesHTML = "";iReplies = 46;mReplies = iReplies;iDiv = 3393
AddReply(410018,"for Israel will not work, saith god--- 3-6-2009","roger dale wallace","00000","03/08/09","                                 3-6-2009AD\n\nTo Hillary Clinton,\n-  W / 14 vs.\n1 Have you noticed all the terrible weather here in America and in all nations who desire IsraelтАШs land to be divided forever from Israel? Have you noticed that their seems to be no end to that terrible weather? Have you noticed money problems in all those nations and in America, as well?\n-\n2 Our nation, is receiving granted just judgment from god, and the reason it is happening, is because our nation, is trying to bring peace to the middle east, as a two state solution to Israel, but that two state solution, it will not work. \n-\n3 And as to why? Because a two state solution, it is not biblical according to Holy christian scripture, therefore, as our nation pursues a two state solution for Israel, then our nation: \n-\n4 тА?We shall continue to be eternally judged of god through Jesus Christ our saviorтА?, because of that two state solution for all of Israel. And our godтАЩs true judgment, it shall remain on America, until: \n-\n5 тА?America shall stop trying to divide Israel from receiving itтАЩs god given right of promise of land, that is promisly given unto Israel-- eternally from god-- eternally foreverтА?. \n-\n6 Our world-- it needs to fear god, for the hour of godтАЩs end time judgment-- has come to this world. And we and the world, we do need-- to repent unto god-- forever. And that true repenting, it needs to be done-- now, and forever.\n-\n7 And that true repenting, it must be done and we and the world: We need to worship forever-- God Our True Father-- eternally forever. \n-\n8 And we and the world-- we do need forever, to respect our godтАЩs forever true oath to Israel, that is found forever eternally written of god in biblical scripture, that is concerning forever the regards of land to Israel-- forever. \n-\n9 And moreover, no doubt, your assessment to bring peace to the middle east, it is going to enflame godтАЩs wrath on America. And again, as far as working towards:\n-\n10 тА?A two-state solution for IsraelтА?, it is a inescapable working that will surely bring godтАЩs wrathful true judgment of greater woe upon us in America and upon our leaders-- immediately (not days and days away).\n-\n11 Do you personally care what god says about your solution in scripture? If you fear god, then do him well, as in encouraging Israel to not divide itтАШs land-- forever. \n \n12 Remember,our kind god, he will send more judgment to America and to all nations who purposely go against godтАЩs holy scripture, as that scripture, is found forever as concerning godтАЩs oath for the true land of Israel.\n");
AddReply(407593,"Roger,(39) I ,love that scenario","Rob","USA","03/02/09","LOL! Blue helmets on American soil.... Blood red American soil. Red with the blood of Blue helmets, and those who brought them in. I like it :-)\n");
AddReply(407527,"Desperate times?","Deborah","Midwest, USA","03/02/09","With the latest U.S. Supreme Court ruling, narrowly upholding our 2nd Amendment right, many citizens have taken to heart the fact that we may lose our freedoms. \n\nI don\'t like guns, hunting, or even target practice.  Guns are noisy, dangerous, and the ammunition litter all over the ground distresses me.  \n\nHOWEVER, we, along with most of our rural neighbors, have heard the alarm and are rushing to obtain licenses for the new \"conceal and carry\" law passed in many states.\n\nEven in our quiet, agricultural area, drug dealers, thieves, and other manevolents are moving in.  In addition, we now have cougars who silently sneak up in the dark and kill our cattle.  We should be able to protect ourselves and our families from harm. \n\nBut, our biggest fear is the stealthy cougar now in the White House.  We are taking seriously his distain toward those \"who cling to their religion and their guns\".  The improbable has become the possible and we are preparing should the possible become the reality.\n\n");
AddReply(407506,"Tamar\'s RIGHT !! Consider this >>","Elaine","Tennessee","03/02/09","IS BILL LYING IN WAIT TO BAN HANDGUNS?\n\nTell Congress Stop the Gun Grabbers in D.C....Oppose H.R. 45\n\nFaxDC.com wants to send this urgent and personalized Blast Fax message to all 535 members of the House and Senate for YOU.\n\nAlert: Tucked away in committee on Capitol Hill is a firearm licensing bill that Second Amendment advocates worry may just be waiting for the right \"Columbine moment\" to emerge and effectively ban handguns in the U.S.\n\nAs WND reported, U.S. Rep. Bobby Rush, D-Ill., sponsored H.R. 45, an extensive licensure law that creates a national database of current firearm owners, requires psychiatric testing and fingerprinting to obtain a license and places new restrictions on gun use and storage.\n\nMike Hammond, legal advisor with Gun Owners of America, told WND that H.R.. 45 gives the federal government so much power over gun ownership, that the wrong administration could use it to \"bring gun ownership in America to an end.\"\n\n\"It takes semi-automatic firearms and handguns Ц the guns people use for personal self-defense,\" Hammond said, \"and sets up a licensure system, that is, the government would have to give you permission to own a gun. The government can therefore also deny that permission, and it would mean an anti-gun administration could use it to effectively ban most guns from private ownership.\n\n\"Even if you are willing to undergo a psychiatric exam, be fingerprinted and do what the bill requires to obtain a license, the law still requires the guns be unloaded and locked up,\" Hammond added. \"It renders the gun practically unavailable for self-defense.\"\n\nAnd even though H.R. 45 has remained dormant in the House Judiciary Committee since it was introduced, Hammond told WND that his organization is worried it may not stay there.\n\n\"Our concern is that Rep. Rush comes from same political machine that Barack Obama comes from,\" Hammond said. \"So we have a real concern that Rush\'s introduction of this reflects the thinking of an Obama administration. And while we don\'t think this bill will be the first thing that the president pushes, before the Obama administration uses a Columbine incident to bring the bill alive, while it\'s still lying on its back [in committee], we want to put a stake through its heart.\"\n\nHammond summarized, \"Ultimately if a license system is in place, any anti-gun administration can come after your guns.\"\n\nH.R. 45, alternatively known as \"Blair Holt\'s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009,\" is named after an Illinois teenager killed by gunshot.\n\nAccording the bill\'s text, \"On the afternoon of May 10, 2007, Blair Holt, a junior at Julian High School in Chicago, was killed on a public bus riding home from school when he used his body to shield a girl who was in the line of fire after a young man boarded the bus and started shooting.\"\n\nThe bill then argues that interstate firearm trafficking and children dying from gun violence create legitimate cause for the federal government to monitor gun ownership and transfers in new ways.\n\nThe bill claims its purpose is \"to protect the public against the unreasonable risk of injury and death associated with the unrecorded sale or transfer of firearms to criminals and youth.\"\n\nIf passed, the bill would make it illegal to own or possess a \"qualifying firearm\" Ц defined as any handgun or any semiautomatic firearm that takes an ammunition clip Ц without a \"Blair Holt\" license.\n\nTo obtain a \"Blair Holt\" license, an application must be made that includes a photo, address, all previous aliases, thumb print, completion of a written firearm safety test and release of mental health records to the attorney general.\n\nFurther, the bill makes it illegal to transfer ownership of a qualifying firearm to anyone who is not a licensed gun dealer or collector. Exceptions to this rule include transfer to family members by gift or bequest and loans, not to exceed 30 days, of a firearm for lawful purposes \"between persons who are personally known to each other.\"\n\nThe bill also requires qualifying firearm owners to report all transfers to the attorney general\'s database. It would also be illegal for a licensed gun owner to fail to record a gun loss or theft within 72 hours or fail to report a change of address within 60 days.\n\nAnd if a minor obtains a weapon and injures someone with it, the owner of the gun Ц if deemed to have failed to meet certain safety requirements Ц faces a multiple-year jail sentence.\n\nH.R. 45 is a resurfacing of 2007\'s H.R. 2666, which contained much of the same language and was co-sponsored by 15 other representatives and Barack Obama\'s current chief of staff, Rahm Emmanuel. H.R. 2666 was also assigned to the House Judiciary committee, where no action was taken.\n\nH.R. 45 currently has no co-sponsors and is likewise assigned to the House Judiciary committee. \n\nDO NOT BE SILENCED BY ANYONE STAND UP! MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!\n\nTAKE ACTION: Send YOUR blast FAX to ALL 535 Congressman NOW!\n\nTo visit FaxDC.com, click here: http://faxdc.com/\n\nTo Fax Blast Capitol Hill, click here: http://faxdc.com/firearms_order.htm\n\n");
AddReply(407305,"To #36: You refuse to comprehend, do you?","Mike","Vienna, VA","03/01/09","This is not about \"gun control\", this is about common decency and prevention of child abuse.  Failure to provide firearms education is indecent and a form of child abuse no different from refusing to toilet train children or, even more appropriately, having sex with your children.  It is an abhorrent, repugnant practice completely at odds with all moral standards of human behavior.  Any person who advocates such horrific, disgusting acts against children should be treated in the same manner as any other advocate of child abuse.  There is nothing to \"discuss\" here.  There are no issues.  You are just a filthy pervert, no different from any child molestor.");
AddReply(407281,"sk...","yvonne","cary","03/01/09","I do honor other person\'s beliefs, however jews hav encountered attacks from christians for two millenia in Europe. You are, obviously, a messianic jew or a christian. As I respect others\' beliefs, so should you do so. This is a jewish website, and I do not think it is appropriate to advertise other faiths, even though I appreciate your  message and the hope you express. It does not offend me, as I see it the person you cite was a jewish rabbi, expoused jewish veiws only, and never became a christian. He also said I have not come to bring peace, on the contrary, so then he could not be the moshiach. I too hope that he will come, but we do not know his name, or who he will be.");
AddReply(406983,"Gosh...sk","Charley Horse","Re: # 30","03/01/09","An I just thought he invented baking soda. What\'s this world coming to when we can\'t trust cake makers?");
AddReply(406970,"Obama and crew need to trump 2nd Ammendment","ROGER","MINNEAPOLIS, MN","03/01/09","The Supreme Court ruled years ago that treaties supersede the US Constitution.  They may try to outlaw \"assault\" weapons again or heavily tax ammunition, but I see their primary success through a UN Small Arms Treaty and then having the blue-hats come it to enforce it; I can imagine Iranians, Pakistanis, and Cubans eager to bring our citizenry into submission.");
AddReply(406961,"#37 Yes Yvonne, I agree with you","satch","UK ","03/01/09","and I wasn\'t promoting agressive arms useage but for protecting ones self and families.   I have been reading the parts of the Koran that speaks of inducing violence on any infidel or whoever is not in favor of Islam under the prophet muhammud.  I hear arguments that some believe Islam is a peaceful religion but when you see so many places in the Koran that they live by- is it any wonder we are having so much trouble with the Arabs today who are encouraged, and blessed and awarded glory by killing a Jew or christian?  Everyone should read these specific writings and there are too many of them just to be errors in translation ect.  If it is ok to tell a lie if it will accomplish what is best for you later it is ok?  Take every advantage that you have opportunity to defeat an enemy!   These things are all apparent as we see the pa arabs hiding behind women and children and firing weapons from hospitals and schools.  No treaty has ever been kept by any Arab faction that hasn\'t been broken.  Anything they say or do is Always to their advantage.  They decieve the media and twist truth to make the Jew the guilty ones which is exactly opposite of the truth and the world hears it so often they believe it as truth.  I pray for the peace of Jerusalem daily and the people who tollerate the onslought that surrounds them.. We can\'t understand what it is like to be in the place the Jew endures today.  They are fighting an endless battle but Yeshua the hammashiach soon will be casting judgement on the enemies of Hashems favorite--the apple of His eye and many will lose their lives in this ordeal but we must be faithful to our belief in principles that have been given us by forefathers and by G-d Himself.  Might we be in that spot to recieve blessing or even judgement knowing in who we believe is the One true God and not a moon god called allah by a single prophet who had really bad psycological and moral problems even contradicting himself in his writings.  Might G-d be true and every [man] a liar.  Shalom");
AddReply(406901,"Satch, UK","yvonne","Cary","02/28/09","The situation in Gr. Britain appears to be out of hand, and so it becomes in much of europe. I was born and raised in The Netherlands. I fully agree with Geert Wilders\' rights to make a movie and express his views. I am inclined to agree with his views. But..The Netherlands has always been a country where people were not armed, and even police were not armed. Guns, shotguns, and hunting rifles do nothing to change the tide of Muslims coming to Europe, many illegally, all over, the tide of terrorism in Israel, and all over Europe. Note that Palestinians are shooting off kassams from Gaza into Israel and individual guns have no power over those illegal declarations and acts of war. It took a well organized Army to go in there, and still there is no power over those who wish to wipe Israel off the map and kill all jews (genocide). Note, that Israeli Action has enpowered the kassam shooting enemies. They have turned it, again, to their advantage. How did they do it? Rhetoric!! Playing the poor attacked waif. Making defeat into victory. Demanding to be fed and clothed by Israel. Guns, again, have no power over that. If Iran shoots off long range missiles with loads of nukes, a gun will also do nothing against that. Evil speech and advocacy of people power with guns only will strengthen the enemy. African Americans in the U.S. have made large strides by demonstrating, rhetoric, studying hard and getting ahead. They demanded, and still demand, that people who treat them badly, deny them their human dignity, and use epitaphs be called to justice. They do it in the courts and they did it in public speeches. No guns, whatsoever, involved. Guns will not silence the Arab treason in the Knesset. If Israel elects Arabs who openly advocate the demise of the nation, and does nothing against them, or alternatively shoots such a person, or let matters go on until an irrate Israeli acts without the benefit of court procedures, both gun ownership and use, and the lack of outspoken protest and legal action against those who commit treason will be used against Israel. It will not be used against the real perpetrator. IF Gr. Britain and The Netherlands cower before muslims who are recent immigrants or probably are illegals who demand to be included in European government at all levels, have Sharia Law replace the law of the Land, and demand that a citizen like Geert Wilders be denied his right to free speech under threat of fatwas, we are not getting at the root of all this mess. The muslim insurgency and threats must be countered, first by proper legal action, second by proper rhetoric and logic, and third when a fatwa is threatened a counter threat of armed resistance to the nation from whence such individuals originated, should be allowed and considered. Bullies must be put in their places. First they attack and bully, threaten, then they take your food, third they demand to be fed and pampered. See any similarities? ");
AddReply(406891,"Mikey, there you go again..","Yvonne","Cary","02/28/09","If you wish to educate YOUR children how to use a gun, fine. I am not against that. IF YOU keep your guns properly locked up sothat your children can not use them without supervision, fine with me too. However, in the U.S. children, teens and others who should not be allowed anywhere near a gun, get their hands on them and then go out to shoot, for example at other students in a school. Nothing, at all to do with ZEKS, Mikey. Although, for some killing and ZEKS are related. Those are exactly the people who should not get their hands on guns, or anything else to kill with. Did you notice, Mikey, that I agree with a well trained militia? I am also not against hunting, with a license, but I would not dream of doing that, nor should any jew. My problem, though, Mikey, is not so much with guns, as it is with Tamar\'s stance against the current U.S. Administration. It is no coincidence, whatsoever, that she writes about this now, at the same time the Republican Party is agitating, by hook and by crook, however it can, against DEMOCRATS, using a.o. the gun issue. Republicans have been voted out, and Democrats have been voted in. Nothing Tamar can do about it, nor can you. She is wasting her time, especially when she repeats, over and over, properly defuted idiotic claims about Mr.  Obama, and so are you. For Israel the real questions are many, such as, should it bow to U.S. pressure and be divided sothat yet another Arab State may be created and be contiguous? Can Palestinians really have four wives and 37 children if they can not support them and then demand that Israel feed them? And IF they are beggars, can they be chosers and demand *pasta*? Tamar\'s continuous incitement is getting a little bit repetitious and leads nowhere. It only serves to make jews look like liars and people who speak evil about others. Against jewish law, Mikey. And quite indecent too. So, Mikey, is the out of thin air connection you made. I am well beyond zeks, at age 75 . It says a lot about you, and nothing about me. Your continuing problems with Israeli government actions against jews in Israel are not at all helped by joining in the chorus about gun control in the U.S. It is not related. The relationship that is at issue is U.S. pressure for Israel to abide with the Oslo Accords, dislocate Israelis en masse to enable *the roadmap*, pressure to feed and pamper those who have vowed to wipe Israel off the map, etc. Keep your nose to the grindstone Mikey and to the real existential issues at hand for Israel.");
AddReply(406885,"Krav Maga update","Meira","Jerusalem IL","02/28/09","It costs 250 NIS a month. about $65. for 6 hours of intense cardio workout and self defense work. Not too bad a way to stay alive a little longer.  Those who can\'t get a gun permit need to do what we can to terminate any sort of attack that doesn\'t involve firearms aimed at us. ");
AddReply(406882,"self employed","Glenda","Florida","02/28/09","Thank you so much! I pray people will read history and prepare themselves. ");
AddReply(406850,"Hold yer Guns!","Satch","UK","02/28/09"," Tks Tamar for the chart and I noticed deaths were listed in millions, not hundreds!  Well, the Clintons and Obama are giving 900 million dollars to Gaza Pa Arabs!   His spending frenzy has no limits--while Americans suffer.  This is intended for rebuilding--but wonder how much will go for rearmmaments?  Hamas will have it All soon.   I\'m holding my breath since it seems that within 24 hours after having \'cursed\' Israel [the nation]  God severely punishes America. This has held true in many instances in past days.   If providing the enemy of the Jews finances isn\'t a curse--what is?   Hey!   See where Obama is boycotting Durham 11 due to anti-Semitism?  The first good thing he\'s done since he has been in office! [compared to 8 bad things]  I know this isn\'t part of the topic but had to share since I\'m so disappointed in the choice people made and are still making!   Glad the back is doing good now and you\'re feeling better and appreciate the topics you share.  We should be praising Geert Wilders for his efforts to enlighten the world on this \'peaceful religion\' (Islam)  through his short film \"Fitna\". Many people dissalusioned and mislead have been brainwashing the Bush administration and those since. This should be on the front pages of all newspapers!   but is truth allowed?");
AddReply(406844,"Guns aren\'t the only answer!","les","Ayr","02/28/09"," True--Obama is trying to rid American citizens of their second amendmewnt right to own firearms.  He is now proposing getting the ammo so the guns will be useless by having the ammo registered and a fellony placed on anyone without specialy marked bullets.  True, Everyone should not have a gun.  Some people are simply afraid and should be.  Small children should not have any access to guns in the home and anyone owning a firearm should know fully well how to use-care for- and sensably know the laws pertaining to the states they are in.  Today a firearms store or gunshop in America are flourishing businesses  even tho the economy is bad people have a fear of government and feel that down the road they may need to protect themselves.  Due to unemployment and homeless it may be necessary to protect your food in the home as people will be getting hungry!  Taking guns away will be like the UK today--under complete rule of the govt. which is now cowering to Muslim population growing and making demands and rather than municipal confrontations the socalled govt. is giving in.  Americans see this and will not ever be void of guns. The NRA stopped the removal of guns once but now people are looking around and seeing the light.   Only crooks and bad people Fear Guns!   Why do so many Polititions?");
AddReply(406786,"An armed society is a polite society","Susan","Springfield","02/28/09","The title of that message comes straight from one of my favorite science fiction authors, Robert Heinlein. \n\nI agree that we need to say no to gun control because after all the law abiding citizens are disarmed, there won\'t be anyone there to protect us from the criminals that will be roaming the streets. \n\nThen again, I\'m such a pessimist that I feel that the United States is falling fast and becoming a Fascist nation with everything that I see in the news. ");
AddReply(406667,"For the record, re: the nic \"Armand Hammer\"","sk","USA","02/27/09","They guy was a Soviet spy.");
AddReply(406660,"Citizen no Subject","Eric","USA","02/27/09","To all those domestic enemys of the republic. Read Carefully\n\nThe following may strike some as provocative. Good. It is meant to inspire Patriots and government officials alike to think, discuss it with their friends, and be prepared for the momentous decision they will be required to make rather quickly, if an attempt to disarm Americans is ever tried again. For, no matter how it might be couched, spun, and rationalized, it will signal the end of America, as we have known it. With the current mood among the electorate, and big-government oriented Progressives now at the top of the ticket for both major political parties, the Progressives are about to take over our government lock, stock, and barrel. These folks have a radically different view of the proper role of government than common folk in the heartland, and actually think the majority has the right to violate the Liberty and natural rights of the minority by legislative or judicial fiat. Liberty loving Patriots will need to remain vigilant and prepared to defend those rights, or accept the status of serf or slave in a glorious sounding Progressive utopia, organized on the repugnant principle of mob rule. \n\nRemember Katrina - Gun Collecting Can Be Treason \n\nSince our schools wonТt teach genuine American history anymore, many can be forgiven for not recalling the provocation that caused proud Englishmen to take up arms against the forces of their king at Lexington and Concord Massachusetts in 1775. These are now considered the opening battles of the American Revolution, even though they occurred over a year before the signing of the Declaration of Independence. \n\nWhen the Minutemen started shooting the Redcoats, who were on a mission to confiscate and destroy their arsenal at Concord, they would have been considered by most as engaging in insurrection against their lawful government. From the perspective of the King, his loyal troops, and the majority of loyal British subjects then residing in the colonies, the kingТs troops were just following lawful orders to disarm the colonists. The Loyalists undoubtedly viewed the Patriots as a lunatic fringe of disgruntled Сtax protesters,Т and supported the Redcoats. \n\nThe Patriots learned a couple of valuable lessons that day. One was to disperse and conceal their arms so they didnТt make a convenient target for the forces of tyranny. The other was that they could easily rout an overwhelming force of СRegularsТ with guerrilla tactics. The lesson for the Loyalists was that vigilant free men on these shores Ц American Patriots Ц would never passively allow themselves to be disarmed by their government. \n\nTo true Patriots, the meaning and intent of the Second Amendment to our Constitution is not in question. It is no less than the reset button on our Republic Ц in case the First Amendment doesnТt work, the Second one will. It protects a sovereign right of all free men that is not negotiable, alterable, or subject to judicial interpretation. Frankly, all those officials forever tinkering with ways to get around it are wasting their time, on an endeavor that is bordering on treason. Please understand that this inalienable natural right existed long before the Constitution was drafted, and will exist long after these United States disintegrate. The only reason it was enumerated in the Bill of Rights, was to make it clear to our public servants that it was taboo for them even to try repeating King GeorgeТs mistake. \n\nNinety percent of Americans could vote to repeal the Second Amendment, and the right of free men to own and carry weapons would still exist; for our Constitution does not, and could not, grant or deny our natural rights. It can only help us defend them from those who wish it could. If you do not understand this truth, please do some studying, discussing, and pondering until you do. Free men in this world are born with their natural rights, they are not a mere privilege to be bestowed or withdrawn at the whim of a capricious government, popularly elected or not. \n\nThe Second Amendment is not about hunting, target practice, or fowling pieces. Arms are weapons, and it would be irresponsible of Americans ever to permit errant public servants to disarm us. The disarming of honest citizens during the civil unrest (when they were arguably most needed) in the aftermath of the Hurricane Katrina disaster, was an embarrassment to law enforcement everywhere, and a wakeup call to the rest of us. The citizens of New Orleans were so caught off guard by the audacity of the move that the police got away with it. We simply cannot ever permit such a travesty to happen again. \n\nTherefore: \n\nTo all elected officials, sheriffs, deputies, marshals, constables, sundry law enforcement officers, and military personnel. As a Vietnam era veteran and former peace officer myself, I respect your service and understand that most of you value our Liberty as much as any citizen. For the few who may not fully comprehend what that means, this is a reminder that as a condition of your employment as one of our public servants, you were required to swear an oath to defend the Constitution of these United States of America. We the people who employ you, take this oath seriously and regard any breach of same treasonous. \n\nBe advised that hereafter your sovereign employers will consider any order to disarm private citizens, in any jurisdiction within these United States, a brazen act of treason. Further, any officer who obeys such a treasonous order, and attempts to confiscate our arms, is himself engaged in an act of treason. Keep in mind, УI was just following ordersЕФ never has been, and never will be, considered a valid defense for treason. Anyone receiving such an order has the solemn duty to arrest immediately the traitorous fool who made it; and, most regrettably, any fellow officers inclined to execute it. Failing that, it would be advisable to resign and get out of a conspicuous uniform immediately. \n\nFor those arrogant enough to think government has the overwhelming force and would prevail, think again. We take our Liberty seriously. Unlike the unprepared and baffled citizens of New Orleans, do not expect us to cower in our homes awaiting your arrival. You will be ambushed in the field in the spirit of North Bridge at Concord, by a serious force of well-armed citizens, intent on summarily eradicating with extreme prejudice, any traitors who are intent on disarming us. Then, we will track down and hang the supercilious ass who gave the treasonous order. \n\nDonТt even think about violating the Posse Comitatus Act and trying to field our military forces against us. It is unclear how many would violate their oath and fire on American Patriots defending their right to keep and bear arms, but we would prevail in the end anyway. We would win the same way our forefathers defeated the British occupation; the Vietnamese defeated the American occupation; the Afghans defeated the Soviet occupation; and the Jihadists are in the process of defeating the occupation of Iraq. These victories came about, not by brilliance on the battlefield; but by simply refusing to lose, and wearing down the occupiers until they eventually just gave up and went home, weary of the grind, the cost, and the frustrating inability ever to achieve final victory. \n\nPonder this carefully, you Sons of Liberty, and be well prepared for the fateful decision you are likely to eventually have to make. Respect for authority is deeply ingrained in many; but there frequently comes a time in a manТs life when honor and self respect demand that we stand up on our hind legs and bellow in rage at injustice and the forces of tyranny. We are fast approaching such a time and our birthright as freemen will be seriously tested. Freeman, serf, or slaveЕ the choice will be yours to make. Choose wisely.\n");
AddReply(406659,"Sons of Liberty ","Eric","USA","02/27/09","Obama to Seek New Assault Weapons Ban \nThe Ban Expired in 2004 During the Bush Administration. \nBy JASON RYAN \nWASHINGTON, Feb. 25, 2009 \n\n\nThe Obama administration will seek to reinstate the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 during the Bush administration, Attorney General Eric Holder said today. \nPHOTO Wednesday Attorney General Eric Holder said that the Obama administration will seek to reinstitute the assault weapons ban which expired in 2004 during the Bush administration. \nWednesday Attorney General Eric Holder said that the Obama administration will seek to reinstitute the assault weapons ban which expired in 2004 during the Bush administration. \n(AP Photos/ABC News Graphic ) \n\n\"As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons,\" Holder told reporters. \n\nHolder said that putting the ban back in place would not only be a positive move by the United States, it would help cut down on the flow of guns going across the border into Mexico, which is struggling with heavy violence among drug cartels along the border. \n\n\"I think that will have a positive impact in Mexico, at a minimum.\" Holder said at a news conference on the arrest of more than 700 people in a drug enforcement crackdown on Mexican drug cartels operating in the U.S. \n\nMexican government officials have complained that the availability of sophisticated guns from the United States have emboldened drug traffickers to fight over access routes into the U.S. \n\nA State Department travel warning issued Feb. 20, 2009, reflected government concerns about the violence. \n\n\"Some recent Mexican army and police confrontations with drug cartels have resembled small-unit combat, with cartels employing automatic weapons and grenades,\" the warning said. \"Large firefights have taken place in many towns and cities across Mexico, but most recently in northern Mexico, including Tijuana, Chihuahua City and Ciudad Juarez.\" \n\nAt the news conference today, Holder described his discussions with his Mexican counterpart about the recent spike in violence. \n\n\"I met yesterday with Attorney General Medina Mora of Mexico, and we discussed the unprecedented levels of violence his country is facing because of their enforcement efforts,\" he said. \n\nHolder declined to offer any time frame for the reimplementation of the assault weapons ban, however. \n\n\"It\'s something, as I said, that the president talked about during the campaign,\" he said. \"There are obviously a number of things that are ЦЦ that have been taking up a substantial amount of his time, and so, I\'m not sure exactly what the sequencing will be.\" \nIn a brief interview with ABC News, Wayne LaPierre, president of the National Rifle Association, said, \"I think there are a lot of Democrats on Capitol Hill cringing at Eric Holder\'s comments right now.\" \n\nDuring his confirmation hearing, Holder told the Senate Judiciary Committee about other gun control measures the Obama administration may consider. \n\n\"I think closing the gun show loophole, the banning of cop-killer bullets and I also think that making the assault weapons ban permanent, would be something that would be permitted under Heller,\" Holder said, referring to the Supreme Court ruling in Washington, D.C. v. Heller, which asserted the Second Amendment as an individual\'s right to own a weapon. \n\nThe Assault Weapons Ban signed into law by President Clinton in 1994 banned 19 types of semi-automatic military-style guns and ammunition clips with more than 10 rounds. \n\n\"A semi-automatic is a quintessential self-defense firearm owned by American citizens in this country,\" LaPierre said. \"I think it is clearly covered under Heller and it\'s clearly, I think, protected by the Constitution.\"\n\n--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n");
AddReply(406642,"Yvonne, dear, please keep your indecency to yourself!","Mike","Vienna, VA","02/27/09","Really, this is quite disgusting!  What kind of person would publicly argue that we should not educate our children regarding guns?  No responsible parent would permit a child to pass the age of seven without learning how to use a firearm.  To do otherwise is rougly equivalent to a refusal to toilet train your children.\n\nWhat are you going to advocate next, child sex?");
AddReply(406543,"To Rob, # 18 - still doesn\'t work. ?Anyone else have this problem?","tamar yonah","","02/27/09","");
AddReply(406535,"Yvonne, those tragedies galore","Meira Warrior Princess","Jerusalem IL","02/27/09","are usually caused in homes where Dad has a gun for protection but NOONE knows about gun safety. I grew up watching Roy and Dale and wanting to be Dale and so I had cap pistols since we lived in an urban area.  My Dad had a handgun hidden away but in the house. I was taught as soon as I could hold a water pistol that you never ever point the thing at someone you don\'t intend to shoot.   I was also taught what to do if a friend started to \"horse around\" with a gun in my presence. THAT is how those tragedies are avoided. Sure kids under 18 can handle guns. We Jews abhor hunting but for many in the US still, it means meat on the table. A 13 year old is considered a man in Jewish society, why not elsewhere? A young man that age should be able to provide food for his family if necessary. Age is a number. When my husband went into the IDF he had been raised to hate guns. As a grunt he had to use and carry one. So MWP gave him a quick lesson as stated above on how to stay safe. Sure enough, some idiot came up behind him and shoved his M16  into hubby\'s back. He got a reaction he never expected. After that no more horse play with weapons in the barracks. It\'s all in the perspective,Yvonne. And cowering in fear of inanimate objects is not the way to be safe because the criminals and terrorists sure aren\'t afraid to carry and use them. \n\n");
AddReply(406454,"Dan, # 9 - You\'re doing a great job, keep it up...","Armand Hammer","","02/27/09","I was nearby when the tank drove into the Davidian compound. I knew the liasion officer between the FBI and the Tx DPS. He stopped the firefighters from extinguishing the flames.\n\nHe left the continent shortly after, defending his departure on a somewhat shakey excuse.\n\nI have eaten in the Wyatt Cafeteria in Killeen, on hwy 190, where the massacre took place (referred to in the bottom video, I\'m sure). I was an acquaintance of one or more of the victims. \n\nThe lady in the vid is right: we need protection from more than just street criminals (in reference to her last comment).\n\nSnipers killed both an innocent woman and the baby she held in her arms at Ruby Ridge, then claimed \"they could\'nt see clearly\".\n\nFema ignored the starving, thirsty victims of Katrina letting people they could save die. My friends were turned back by someone \"totally unknown\"....and held unsurprisingly.... unaccountable. \n\nAccident? I think not.\n\nAn inventor friend of the family mysteriously disappeared soon after he developed a way to increase gas mileage.\n\nDan, in the end you will be justified, but your naysayers shamed.\n\nBetter to die a pauper in erets Yisrael, than die a prince, in a foreign land. Am Yisrael Chai!");
AddReply(406452,"Defiance","Donna","Australia","02/27/09","Watch this yvonne maybe you are related to one of the survivors and you can thank that heritage to the courage of the man or women holding that gun.\n\nhttp://www.movietrailers.net.au/defiance/");
AddReply(406447,"Defiance","Donna","Australia","02/27/09","One of the first things dictatorial governments do is disarm its population.  They should put history lessons back into public schools.  Hitler gained control in Germany \"under the guise of\" safeguarding their interests and he disarmed the population.  Watch the movie Defiance.");
AddReply(406437,"Tamar, comment on the so called nationalization of banks..","Rob","usa","02/27/09","These investment firms/banks have commited crimes that border on treason and threaten US National security. I have no problem with government involment with public oversight. We have this oversight through our elected representatives in the house and senate.\n\nThese scum have proven they are the lowest form of life by stealing peoples retirements, devaluating the biggest investment of the average person, and as a result causing unemployment numbers to elevate, companies who did nothing wrong to struggle, etc.\n\n\nin the words of the great Charlie Daniels, Take a tall oak tree, an a short piece a rope...");
AddReply(406422,"Dan, the conspiracy nut from Jerusalem.","sk","USA","02/27/09","Dude, you know almost nothing about American politics.  I expect you are fully as expert on Israeli politics.\n\nWhat kind of dodo fails to understand that a system where some would scheme to change the law to allow confiscation of guns is preferable to a system that is ALREADY taking away guns and in which there is no legal basis to demand to bear arms?\n\nYou think I don\'t know that there are different views on the Second Amendment?  There are also different views on the First Amendment.  And opinions change over time.  We must be vigilant.\n\nDan, you get an \"F\" yet again.  You are fully representative of the Israeli people, and I would NOT like you to come home to the US.");
AddReply(406301,"# 10, Netanel...","yvonne","cary","02/26/09","Thank you for that information. I am all for that set-up and  a legitimate militia which is ready and available at all times. That would also require regular training and meetings. Does that happen as well? I think that might also be how the militia in Switzerland was set up. Did not check on that one for half a century, though. The problem with Tamar\'s *reasoning* ( and the *reasoning* of conservative Americans) is  that  she/they advocate weapaons for everyone. I have seen households where they collect guns and ammo and that stuff is readily available to their children, under 18!! These children are also learning to shoot shotguns at a very early age (hunting). We have here examples gallore of the tragedies that may lead to. Personally, as a jew, I also abhor hunting, killing of animals, and then eating them too! That meat is not kosher either. Even if you are against it, it is quite possible that a child or grandchild spends the night, then is invited to go hunting, comes back with the *prize* and expects you to fry it up! I have a problem, or two, with that. Militias are fine, but must be regulated. Tamar\'s agenda, though is another one. What she, and many appearing on this website, have in their view is the *libruls*, and Obama. I am no *librul*. I am conservative politically. I am also FOR the current government in the U.S. You see, living in the U.S., we see what Reaganomics, the Republicans, and the likes of Russ Limbaugh have done. We also live with it, daily. Apart from all that, I also have a serious problem with evil speech and slander. As a jew I value education, the likes of Limbaugh and some others pooh pooh education. They celebrate their ignorance. Remember, what you know, your skills too, you can always take with you and no one can take that away from you. All the rest may disappear into black holes, some even dug by our fellow jews. And Mike is right, guns do nothing if you do not have a will to change. Being ultra orthodox and davening all hours of the day does not make you spiritual or holy. Living in Israel does not make you spiritual and holy. Blacks have made great strides in the U.S. over half a century. Israel, after 60 years and millenia before that, still gets beaten down and has no answer to attack and assault. Blacks in the U.S. use rhetoric, logic, demonstration and education to make their points, and they have been effective, not guns. Ghandi (India) did not use guns. Speech defines the speaker, not the audience. It may kill the speaker, the audience and the target. ");
AddReply(406267,"Dear Tamar, correction, I hope","Rob","usa","02/26/09","http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF5pEsJQIXI");
AddReply(406226,"To Rob #14 - Your video url doesn\'t work :-( ","tamar yonah","","02/26/09","");
AddReply(406212,"##4,10","Meira Warrior Princess","Jerusalem IL","02/26/09","#4 With the exception of those of us who do not have children in the IDF but could still bear arms ourselves if permitted to. Now they\'ve gotten the old guys like my husband out of reserves so no guns in our house :-( whic brings me to #10; it is also illegal for new immirgrants who\'ve not been here 3 years, anyone who does not live in beyond the \"green line\" or who is not engaged in a profession wehre he carries large sums of money or precious stones. Some security personnel may bear arms. It leaves too many of us vulnerable. My husband is right now looking into learning Krav Maga. Not foolproof but if someone comes at us with a knife he\'ll be in trouble. \nMeanwhile we seek way s to bear arms legally . \n");
AddReply(406210,"Dear Larry","Rob","usa","02/26/09","Please do not put me in the same catagory as Rush Limbaugh. I do not listen to idiots like him. I heard he said he hopes Obama will fail. screw him! If Obama fails, America fails.\n\nI\'m not sure you realize the scope of the fanancial problems we face, and how that effects the rest of the world, yes even tiny little Judah is affected.\n\n");
AddReply(406196,"Dan, Relax buddy","Rob","usa","02/26/09","Who cares what the Atty. General said?\n\nAll the nonsense you quote is no more than evagelical end times inspired hype. This is the very reason I have cancelled my support for the NRA. They are also on this bandwagon.\n\nlet me make this as clear as possible Dan, and I speak for millions of Americans, is everyone listening? Ok,\n\nYOU CAN HAVE MY GUNS BULLETS FIRST, OR PRY THEM FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS.\n\n\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF5EsJQlXI\n\n");
AddReply(406184,"First of all, the numbers in your chart...","Mike","Vienna, VA","02/26/09","...for both Russia and China need to be multiplied by at least a factor of 3.  In China\'s case, a factor of 6 might be closer to the truth, but no one will ever really know.\n\nSecond, guns are useless unless there is a will to use them.  In Iraq, virtually every household had at least one AK.  Nonetheless, Saddam ruled and murdered millions and the Americans were able to walk in almost without firing a shot.  On the other hand, when the Iraqis decided that they didn\'t want Americans there, the ground began to burn under the feet of America\'s soldiers.\n\nSince the Jews of the Holy Land do not have the will to use their guns, those guns are utterly useless.");
AddReply(406151,"PS, Yvonne","Larry","TA","02/26/09","Do you really want to threaten Israel with Jews turning against her? That seems even nuttier than the typical neurotic impulse we see so often on these Boards.");
AddReply(406149,"Yes, Yvonne","Larry","","02/26/09","Americans chose Barack Hussein (his swearing-in name). Many are now having second thoughts. I suspect you are too. What will happen nobody knows, but clearly many Lefties and African-Americans are lining up to \'get theirs.\' I know a guy in California; his two sons are cops in a suburban town that is part of Silicon Valley. The week before the election one of his sons stopped a black guy for some offense and the other son stopped a Latino. Both apparently volunteered that \'our time is coming\' and some more words to this effect. Eric Holder has volunteered that America is not a nation of cowards. In fact this is not true, but the bravest Americans, in general, are also conservatives. We\'re not going to see Rob voting Obama. Obie and Michelle \'got out\' the White Guilt vote, including its driving Jewish Guilt component. \n\nPersonally, I think Tamar and Dan are somewhat overstating the eventualities, but I have no doubt that Obie wants his massive civilian security force; he said so. Ayres wrote in a book he or he and his cute wife penned that Barry and he discussed the need to reeducate 25 million Americans. Rob and SK will be on that list. So will David Horowitz, Bill Kristol, Limbaugh, and large portions of the populations of the Red states, in particular. You guys don\'t \'get\' just how much hate the Left carries for its enemies. What mitigates against this is the ferocity of a certain element of the American public, which the MSM typically derides as \'far-right\', \'militias\' etc. Jews are leery of associating with such folks, and I guess that makes sense. \n\nPersonally, I am not a trembler - despite the full-faucet derision of SK - but Nancy Pelosi\'s face positive fills me with fear! How about you, wise old lady? :)");
AddReply(406129,"#4","Netanel","","02/26/09","In Israel, you can only get firearms if you are mentally stable not suicidal, not likely to be a terrorist, not abusive etc...) and past age 18. more powerful weopons, such as M16s, can only be obtained after serving in the army (with volunteers in the border guard being the exception).");
AddReply(406066,"sk clueless - Att\'y Gen. Eric Holder will disarm you, US police state ","Dan","Jerusalem","02/26/09","As usual, sk and Vienna Mike prefer to flap their mouths/keyaboards instead of actually doing research & thinking.\n\n1) Attorney General Eric Holder has stated that the right to bear arms is a COLLECTIVE right, not an individual right, hence the gov\'t can take your guns.\n\nhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/09/AR2009010903787_pf.html\n\nLast year, Holder and other former Justice Department officials from Democratic administrations filed a friend of the court brief in a landmark D.C. gun ownership case, arguing that the Second Amendment gives citizens a \"collective right\" to bear arms rather than individual ownership rights. \n\n2) Obama is planning a civilian military force just as powerful as the army. (perhaps to knock on your door & confiscate your weapons ?)\n\nhttp://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=69601\n\n3) Police State -- New Legislation HR 645 -- to establish FEMA camps in the US\n\nhttp://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12073\n\n3) The increasing militarization of the police.  \nIf you think Yasamniks are only in Israel, read below:\n\narticles from Wiliam Grigg\'s blog\n\nhttp://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/search/label/Homeland%20security%20state%3B%20police%20militarization%3B%20police%20corruption\n\n");
AddReply(406050,"Hey Tamar, you welcome for the inspiration, hehe!","Rob","usa","02/26/09","It is not what is written, but what is inferred in the US Constitution, Its authors left plenty of room for interpretation, having just won independence twelve years prior, they were well aware the abuses governments are capable of.\n\nThis amendment has little to do with self defence against criminals, it is intended to prevent the abuses of a tyrannical government....\n\n\nYou are absolutly correct in that a constitution is only as strong as the people who are willing to fight for it, and I assure you we Yanks are fighters. Heck, hardly a day goes by that I am not involved in some sort of altercation, LOL!\n\n\nTamar responds:  Rob, great wit. You always make me laugh.\n");
AddReply(406048,"Do you really think that the sorts of guns available to civilians","Yitzi","USA","02/26/09","can stop government forces if push comes to shove?  If they can, the Second Amendment is still relevant.  If they can\'t, both it and your argument (and it is essentially based on your argument) are obsolete.\n\nTamar responds: Did you see the second video?  it\'s not JUST about the government, and why should some legislators deny people the right to have the means to defend themselves?  And against criminals who -anyway- have guns?  Guns also SAVE lives.");
AddReply(406034,"Just a little poem...I hope you don\'t mind","Justin Other Wyndbaugh","Haley\'s Comet","02/26/09","I walked down to the ocean\nI short brisk walk you see \nI looked out o\'re the water\nBut saw nought a leafy bearing tree\n\nNow that may not surprise you\nSpecially in such times we be\nWhat I did see was two grey warships\nSailing out to sea\n\nThey bore our sons and daughters\nOur precious progeny\nOft to some potention hazzard\nFor some foreign destiny\n\nI don\'t mind telling you....\nI\'d rather seen some lively, thriving, leafy....little tree.\n\nBless you, Tamar! By the way, how is your back? Are you still taking the calcium and protein?\n\nTamar responds:  Back is good, thank G-d!  :-)\n");
AddReply(406027,"Guns and bullets...","Armand Hammer","","02/26/09","can only protect one so far. And what happens when the ammo runs out, or the numbers of the opposition too great, or artillery, or unseen snipers are called in? \n\nWhat happens when they come in the wee hours of the morn?\n\nPerhaps, sometimes, the best policy is to become invisible. \n\nAlthough by no-means failsafe, extra planning beyond simply obtaining weapons can lead to preservation of life...like deer in cover. \n\nMake no mistake, the last dozen or so deer I killed were at one time less than 10 paces from me....often I stationed in open view, no \'ground\' or \'tree\' stand, in short grass, beside a spindly bush. \n\nBut who knows how many I didn\'t see...perhaps the choicest ones.\n\n\"If you can be seen, you can be hit!\" is a true military saying; which means in indirect application: in times of great danger one must go where one can, regardless of the fences. \n\nThere is no reason to make it easy on our enemies. \"Home\" (a.k.a. the Alamo stance) is not always safest. Get creative! Do it NOW! It doesn\'t matter which continent you live upon.\n\nP.S. Great job Tamar! \n\nRemember everyone, gear up NOW and be ready. We must be wiser than our teachers, and steps ahead of our enemies. And lastly, typical buildings do not provide the best cover.\n");
AddReply(406013,"Tell me, Tamar...","yvonne","cary","02/26/09","are there in Israel qualifications for bearing arms? What arms are allowed and which are not? Can an 11-yr old in Israel have a hunting rifle and where would he go hunting? In Israel who serves in the Army? Could we make a case that those who declare allegiance to Israel and have served in the army would be could prospects to be part of an armed militia, and who would not be? Do YOU think that an Arab member of Knesset, for example, who pledges allegiance to wiping Israel off the map, if such a person exists, as an Israeli, should have the right to bear arms in Israel even if he refuses to pledge allegiance to the nation? You make no sense to me Tamar. But I possibly do not get it, so explain matters to me, will you? I am here to be enlightened.");
AddReply(406011,"Interesting views, Tamar!!","yvonne","cary","02/26/09","A well-armed militia is NOT the same thing as every citizen having arms. Some citizens should not have arms at all. There are examples gallore of the feebleminded or otherwise mentally impaired who suddenly start shooting innocents. It has happened the last few years with some frequency in schools. Kids have access to hunting rifles, and an 11-yr old shot his father and a companion. Maybe they *deserved to be shot*, who knows. But that 11-yr old boy certainly does not deserve a *record* for a lifetime! So, in Israel everyone is armed. I knew that. And, how, Tamar, is that helpful with the terrorists? Does not appear to change much. Yes, the U.S. and its Constitution are dependent on active citizen participation, and that, Tamar, is not  shooting each other, not even slitting throats. That is what Hamas does, and Hezbullah, or Al Qaeda. Active citizen participation is voting, seeing that your vote counts, participating in meetings and discussion. Writing legislators about matters that concern you and how you would like them to vote as your representative. It is even writing comment on websites.I for example do that, even though I do not get paid for it, nor would I want to, nor do I put my name on it - it is known, however, by the editors. Your preoccupation with Barack Obama is really pathetic. He did not initiate the roadmap. A President, in the U.S. and legislators, in the U.S. serve at the pleasure of the populus, Tamar. I prefer a real democracy over a Republic, with more political parties and thus choices, but the process appears to be more transparent than it is in Israel, with the same people at the helm, again, and again. I have nothing against these persons and their policies. The question is, are Israelis pleased with them. Some are not. Finally, Tamar, I am sorry to say that I do not see you stand for anything constructive. Much of it is inuendo, and your theme against the current U.S. government is obvious and consistent. You know, Tamar, Americans voted for this government, as Israelis voted for their Israeli representation. You are not only criticizing the U.S. government, you are critizing the mental capacities of the U.S. population, oh wise and allknowing one. One result could be that a number of U.S. citizens get tired of this and write their legislators about aid to Israel. Too many of those, and you would be in real trouble.");
AddReply(405966,"Better check again","American","CHELM","02/26/09","\" most homes in Israel have guns or army issued rifles since people here have children serving in the army\"");
AddReply(405960,"What Rubbish!","sk","USA","02/26/09","Actually, right now your government is trying to take guns from the settlerfolk, and you have no Second Amendment at all!\n\nIt\'s never to late to return home (to the United States)!  If you will it, it is no dream!  We can use Jews with some experience with firearms in the USA!  (Tremblers need not apply.)");

WriteReplies(6,3393,iDiv);