sRepliesHTML = "";iReplies = 14;mReplies = iReplies;iDiv = 3166
AddReply(367287,"Steven Plaut\'s a tool","David Ben-Ariel","Toledo, Ohio","12/02/08","Again apparent Shabak stooge Steven Plaut throws out the baby with the bathwater and attempts to lump all \"conspiracists\" together. If only he would study history and learn something, he would see that it has been filled with very real conspiracies (that the Steven Plauts of those days, like these days, mocked and were later proven dead wrong). This much we know for sure: Shimon Peres came to power over Rabin\'s dead body.\nwww.davidbenariel.org\n\n#6 was not written by me.");
AddReply(367284,"Throwing baby out with bathwater","David Ben-Ariel","Toledo","12/02/08","What a typical diversionary tactic Steven Plaut employs! Again he throws out the baby with the bathwater and attempts to lump all \"conspiracists\" together. If only he would study history, he would see that it has been filled with conspiracies from the start that, at the time, the Steven Plauts mocked and were later proven dead wrong. This much we know for sure: Shimon Peres came to power over Rabin\'s dead body.");
AddReply(366613,"What grade are you in?","Todd","Tillamook","12/01/08","Once again, a bunch of name calling in an attempt to slander and marginalize someone you disagree with. What\'s worse is you have to have a TV show do your thinking for you, pathetic!");
AddReply(365982,"Perhaps the problem lies...","Legless Centipede","Nowhare","11/28/08","with the word \"theory\". \nYou see WW2 was not \"theory\" for certain individuals attempted to gain control over others, using tactics involving \"conspiracy\". \n\nWhy, today, \'conspiracy\' happens every day --from business \"takeovers\" to piracy upon the high seas. Only \"nuts\" and the \"intellectually challenged\" would deny that.\n\nThe proof is in the pudding: unfortunately, when the smoke clears from any situation, and one finds oneself either in charge of, or, at a new level of being at the mercy of someone else, is the proof of \"conspiracy\" justified.\n\nBut in the end, when all is said and done, those who are alert to questionable behavior, and take evasive action, have a better chance of \"escape\" than the \"nuts\" and the \"intellectually challenged\" who did NOTHING.\n\nTime will tell Mr. Plaut, where you stand indeed---upon wise or foolish ground. \n\nFortunately, HaShem knows who are His. May He bless His people.\n\n");
AddReply(365706,"liars!  fools!","julie","ay sham","11/27/08","Not a single \"fact\" raised by Y of Nitzan is correct.  If the conspiracists really were on to something, why would they need to keep lying so much?   He/She also failed to mention the UFO research background of the author of those \"books\" he/she was so enamoured with.");
AddReply(365669,"For Y Nitzan","sami","k ono","11/27/08","There is a far LARGER number of books that say the collapse of the WTC on 911 was an inside job not caused by the planes, and even more that invent theories about the JFK assassination.  They are all wrong.  The existence of such \"books\" proves nothing.  Do you know how many books are out there insisting there never was any Shoah in World War II?");
AddReply(365604,"Velvel is the sort of dude who","ben","la","11/27/08","will insist that you have never shown him any facts no matter how many times you show him that 2   2 is four, and will dismiss it as an unproven allegation by someone refusing to acknowledge the credible theory that it is really five.");
AddReply(365597,"Why believe the govt. and their commissions?","Y","Nitzan","11/27/08","Just because someone doesn\'t believe in the completely faulty Shamgar report on the Rabin murder - doesn\'t make them \"conspiracists\".  There are 5 well documented, well investigated books on why Amir didn\'t kill Rabin.  Even the late John Kennedy Jr. was investigating this angle.  Even Rabin\'s own family expressed doubts about the Shamgar Investigation.  A very high percentage of Israelis don\'t believe the Shamgar report.  Perhaps accepting the government\'s official version requires one to be more of a \"nut\" or \"of lessor intelligence\".  Governments and politicans lie - they\'re the ones who produce the \"official investigations\" like the Shamgar report.  I put more credence in investigative reporters.  By the way, Amir initially denied killing Rabin during initial police questioning.  I notice your article didn\'t deal with or refute any of the evidence found in these 5 books on who killed Rabin, but rather you called such skeptics derogatory names - \"nuts\", having \"low intelligence\",\"conspiracists\".  The name calling implies that you have a motive other than interest in the truth.");
AddReply(365584,"Aw we all know that","david ben ariel","toledo","11/27/08","Aw we all know that it was the UFOs working for the Vatican and the freemasons, in league with the CFR, who were behind the Rabin killing, the murder of JFK, the downing of the Hindenberg, and ethanol");
AddReply(365448,"To #2, about Rabin","Yitzi","USA","11/26/08","I don\'t think he\'s denying that Raviv existed, he\'s just denying those who claim Amir didn\'t do it (as for the claim Raviv set him up to it, I\'m not sure what he thinks).");
AddReply(365447,"Really?  They use the same methods?   So why don\'t you discuss them?","Velvel","silver spring","11/26/08","It\'s easy to point out nonsense methods that are easily refutable and then just equate something else with that approach.   The hard part would be to actually PROVE what you are saying.   Expose the methods and the facts if you can.   If not, shut your piehole and stop trying to compare rabin situation with 9/11 moonbat central just to knock it down, shut people up, and divert attention away from it.    We can see clearly how ridiculous 9/11 theories are.   Saying \"Rabin stories are just like that\" doesn\'t cut it.   Prove your case or shut your mouth.   As we\'ve said to you time and again at this site.   Those refuting 9/11 insanity have done so with facts and analysis.   Not just by saying \"It\'s stupid\"   or \"It\'s not likely\" ");
AddReply(365407,"brandy and Larry, mix half-truths and pure nonsense","yehezkel","tel aviv","11/26/08","First, yes, Oswald was a lone assassin.  The conspiracy theories about the JFK killing are is idiotic as those about 911.  Second, the fact that Avishai Raviv may have misbehaved hardly means he was part of some sort of conspiracy with Yigal Amir.  He was a police mole.  So what?  Does the exsitence of police moles prove conspiracy \"theories\"?  Third, the nonsense about scrambling planes on 911 was covered in the TV show in question, as were the engieneering questions.  Brandy should go watch the show and listen to its arguments before spouting out his baseless nonsense.  \nNixon\'s plumbers, Teddy Kennedy, and lots of other people have misbehaved.  Misbehavior does not prove the validity of any conspiracist \"theories\" and skeptics about such conspiracist \"theories\" are not saying that evil or stupidity does not exist. \nBravo to Plaut for debunking this nonsense!");
AddReply(365363,"Steve\'s Reassurances","Larry","TA","11/26/08","They don\'t reassure me much. He basically states that conspiracies don\'t exist. Oswald must have been a lone assassin by this statement of faith. The Union Bank could not have aided Hitler, though historians like John Loftus proved it so. The sinking of the Maine was just as it is portrayed in American history books. Nor did Moshe Sharett turn Joel Brand over to the British; nor did Teddy Kollek inform on dozens of Irgunists and others.\n\nSteve\'s hard-headed pragmatism works for me when it comes to explaining the nuttiness of the far Left in Israel and outside it. But Steve leaves that pragmatism and self-advertised rationality when he nixes all conspiracies. There was no coverup at Chappaquiddick, and Nixon did not order his Plumbers into the Watergate complex. Steve is good until he abandons logic in politics and moves to a position of pure faith to protect his personal view of things.\n\nAs far as Rabin\'s murder, certainly Yigal Amir played a role, but it is as if Avishai Raviv never existed, or Hezi Kalo or Karmi Gillon. There never was a fake Eyal ceremony filmed with the help of Channel 2. Us paranoid freaks imagined there was a Raviv: in reality he never existed at all....");
AddReply(365284,"Bah - Do not Believe it!","Brandy","Jerusalem","11/26/08","I worked in the states as an engineer - Millitary contracts. the US monitors ALL all traffic from the tip of Maine to DC. Anything questionable - F15\'s are alert and ready to scramble. Um...so why did it take 20 minutes till the first F15 was sent out?? I\'m shocked that you fell for the cover up sooo easily!!! \n");

WriteReplies(6,3166,iDiv);