sRepliesHTML = "";iReplies = 4;mReplies = iReplies;iDiv = 3061
AddReply(365306,"#2","charles h.","north carolina","11/26/08","america is experiancing the same.muslim colonist come to breed and marry from the middle east.that way they increase twice as fast.the bright side is americans have a right to defend themselves.when jihadist cross my front yard,we can tell G-d they died.");
AddReply(349904,"#1:  in English please.  This is an English website","velvel","silver spring","10/08/08","Lefties once again abandoned by their Muzzie and antisemitic presumed allies.");
AddReply(349643,"Europe ","I. Brzezinski","Warsaw","10/07/08"," http://www.pvv.nl/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1310&Itemid=1\n> \n> Speech Geert Wilders in New York, 25 September 2008\n> iSLAMIZATION OF EUROPE\n> Dear friends,\n> \n> Thank you very much for inviting me. Great to be  at the Four Seasons. I come from a country that \n> has one season only: a rainy season that starts  January 1st and ends December 31st. When we have \n> three sunny days in a row, the government  declares a national emergency. So Four Seasons, that’s\n> new to me.\n> \n> It’s great to be in New York. When I see the skyscrapers and office buildings, I think of what \n> Ayn Rand said: “The sky over New York and the will of man made visible.” Of course. Without the \n> Dutch you would have been nowhere, still figuring out how to buy this island from the Indians. But \n> we are glad we did it for you. And, frankly, you did a far better job than we possibly could have done.\n> \n> I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger \n> looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of \n> the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe \n> itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer  survival of the West. The danger I see looming is \n> the scenario of America as the last man standing. The United States as the last bastion of Western \n> civilization, facing an Islamic Europe. In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who \n> lost Europe? Patriots from around Europe risk their lives every day to prevent precisely this \n> scenario form becoming a reality.  \n> The Europe you know is changing. You have  probably seen the landmarks. The Eiffel Tower and \n> Trafalgar Square and Rome’s ancient buildings and  maybe the canals of Amsterdam. They are still \n> there. And they still look very much the same as they did a hundred years ago.\n> \n> But in all of these cities, sometimes a few  blocks away from your tourist destination, there \n> is another world, a world very few visitors see ­and one that does not appear in your tourist \n> guidebook. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration. All \n> throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighbourhoods where very few indigenous \n> people reside or are even seen. And if they are,  they might regret it. This goes for the police as \n> well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby \n> strollers and a group of children. Their  husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk \n> three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corner. The shops have signs you and I cannot \n> read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos \n> controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighbourhoods, and they are mushrooming \n> in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of \n> increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, city by city.\n> \n> There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are \n> in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf \n> every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.\n> \n> Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo \n> in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now \n> surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighbourhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in \n> many cities. In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, \n> because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims. Many \n> state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils.  In once-tolerant \n> Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear \n> “whore, whore”. Satellite dishes are not pointed  to local TV stations, but to stations in the \n> country of origin.  In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to \n> Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The history of \n> the Holocaust can in many cases no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.  In England \n> sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighbourhoods in \n> France are no-go areas for women without head scarves.  Last week a man almost died after being \n> beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan. Jews are fleeing \n> France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. \n> French is now commonly spoken on the streets of  Tel Aviv, Israel. I could go on \n> forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.\n> \n> A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated \n> that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. \n> Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.\n> \n> Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a \n> strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported \n> that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. \n> One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social \n> Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favour of a worldwide \n> caliphate. A Dutch study reported that half of Dutch Muslims admit they “understand” the 9/11 attacks.\n> \n> Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’. And this is how we give them respect. Our elites are \n> willing to give in. To give up. In my own country we have gone from calls by one cabinet member to \n> turn Muslim holidays into official state holidays, to statements by another cabinet \n> member, that Islam is part of Dutch culture, to an affirmation by the Christian-Democratic \n> attorney general that he is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim \n> majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey.\n> \n> Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behaviour, ranging from petty crimes and random \n> violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has \n> seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. Some prefer to see these as isolated \n> incidents, but I call it a Muslim intifada. I  call the perpetrators “settlers”. Because that is \n> what they are. They do not come to integrate into  our societies, they come to integrate our society \n> into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.\n> \n> Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing \n> many native people to leave their neighbourhoods, their cities, their countries.\n> \n> Politicians shy away from taking a stand against this creeping sharia. They believe in the \n> equality of all cultures. Moreover, on a mundane level, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.\n> \n> Our many problems with Islam cannot be explained  by poverty, repression or the European colonial \n> past, as the Left claims. Nor does it have anything to do with Palestinians or American \n> troops in Iraq. The problem is Islam itself.\n> \n> Allow me to give you a brief Islam 101. The first  thing you need to know about Islam is the \n> importance of the book of the Quran. The Quran is  Allah’s personal word, revealed by an angel to \n> Mohammed, the prophet. This is where the trouble starts. Every word in the Quran is Allah’s word \n> and therefore not open to discussion or  interpretation. It is valid for every Muslim and \n> for all times. Therefore, there is no such a thing as moderate Islam. Sure, there are a lot of \n> moderate Muslims. But a moderate Islam is non-existent.\n> \n> The Quran calls for hatred, violence, submission, murder, and terrorism. The Quran calls for \n> Muslims to kill non-Muslims, to terrorize  non-Muslims and to fulfil their duty to wage war: \n> violent jihad. Jihad is a duty for every Muslim, Islam is to rule the world ­ by the sword. \n> The  Quran is clearly anti-Semitic, describing Jews as monkeys and pigs.\n> \n> The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behaviour \n> is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of \n> peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But \n> Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages ­ at the \n> same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he  fought in battles, how he had his enemies \n> murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of \n> Banu Qurayza. He advised on matters of slavery, but never advised to liberate slaves. Islam has \n> no other morality than the advancement of Islam. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad \n> for Islam, it is bad. There is no gray area or other side.\n> \n> Quran as Allah’s own word and Mohammed as the perfect man are the two most important facets of \n> Islam. Let no one fool you about Islam being a  religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, \n> and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down \n> detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of \n> life. Islam means ‘submission’. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because \n> what it strives for is sharia. If you want to  compare Islam to anything, compare it to \n> communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.\n> \n> This is what you need to know about Islam, in order to understand what is going on in Europe. \n> For millions of Muslims the Quran and the live of Mohammed are not 14 centuries old, but are an \n> everyday reality, an ideal, that guide every aspect of their lives. Now you know why Winston \n> Churchill called Islam “the most retrograde force in the world”, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the\n> Quran.\n> \n> Which brings me to my movie, Fitna.\n> \n> I am a lawmaker, and not a movie maker. But I  felt I had the moral duty to educate about Islam. \n> The duty to make clear that the Quran stands at the heart of what some people call terrorism but \n> is in reality jihad. I wanted to show that the problems of Islam are at the core of Islam, and do not\n> belong to its fringes.\n> \n> Now, from the day the plan for my movie was made public, it caused quite a stir, in the \n> Netherlands and throughout Europe. First, there was a political storm, with government leaders, \n> across the continent in sheer panic. The Netherlands was put under a heightened terror \n> alert, because of possible attacks or a revolt by our Muslim population. The Dutch branch of the \n> Islamic organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir declared that the Netherlands was due for an attack. \n> Internationally, there was a series of incidents. The Taliban threatened to organize additional \n> attacks against Dutch troops in Afghanistan, and a website linked to Al Qaeda published the \n> message that I ought to be killed, while various muftis in the Middle East stated that I would be \n> responsible for all the bloodshed after the screening of the movie. In Afghanistan and \n> Pakistan the Dutch flag was burned on several occasions. Dolls representing me were also \n> burned. The Indonesian President announced that I  will never be admitted into Indonesia again, \n> while the UN Secretary General and the European Union issued cowardly statements in the same vein \n> as those made by the Dutch Government. I could go on and on. It was an absolute disgrace, a sell-out.\n> \n> A plethora of legal troubles also followed, and  have not ended yet. Currently the state of Jordan \n> is litigating against me. Only last week there were renewed security agency reports about a \n> heightened terror alert for the Netherlands because of Fitna.\n> \n> Now, I would like to say a few things about Israel. Because, very soon, we will get together \n> in its capitol. The best way for a politician in  Europe to loose votes is to say something \n> positive about Israel. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian \n> narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I, however, will continue to speak up for Israel. I \n> see defending Israel as a matter of principle. I  have lived in this country and visited it dozens \n> of times. I support Israel. First, because it is  the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of \n> exile up to and including Auschwitz, second  because it is a democracy, and third because \n> Israel is our first line of defense.\n> \n> Samuel Huntington writes it so aptly: “Islam has bloody borders”. Israel is located precisely on \n> that border. This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s \n> territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the \n> Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply \n> in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.\n> \n> The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is \n> jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been \n> no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire \n> for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send  their children to the army and lay awake at \n> night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.\n> \n> Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our \n> Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace \n> to the West. It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their \n> behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous \n> encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof \n> that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems \n> with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean  the start of the final battle for world \n> domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. Therefore, it is not that the West \n> has a stake in Israel. It is Israel.\n> \n> It is very difficult to be an optimist in the face of the growing Islamization of Europe. All \n> the tides are against us. On all fronts we are losing. Demographically the momentum is with \n> Islam. Muslim immigration is even a source of pride within ruling liberal parties. Academia, \n> the arts, the media, trade unions, the churches, the business world, the entire political \n> establishment have all converted to the suicidal theory of multiculturalism. So-called journalists \n> volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a ‘right-wing extremists’ or \n> ‘racists’. The entire establishment has sided with our enemy. Leftists, liberals and \n> Christian-Democrats are now all in bed with Islam.\n> \n> This is the most painful thing to see: the betrayal by our elites. At this moment in \n> Europe’s history, our elites are supposed to lead us. To stand up for centuries of civilization. To \n> defend our heritage.  To honour our eternal Judeo-Christian values that made Europe what it \n> is today. But there are very few signs of hope to be seen at the governmental level. Sarkozy, \n> Merkel, Brown, Berlusconi; in private, they probably know how grave the situation is. But \n> when the little red light goes on, they stare into the camera and tell us that Islam is a \n> religion of peace, and we should all try to get along nicely and sing Kumbaya. They willingly \n> participate in, what President Reagan so aptly called: “the betrayal of our past, the squandering of our\n> freedom.”\n> \n> If there is hope in Europe, it comes from the people, not from the elites. Change can only come \n> from a grass-roots level. It has to come from the citizens themselves. Yet these patriots will have \n> to take on the entire political, legal and media establishment.\n> \n> Over the past years there have been some small, but encouraging, signs of a rebirth of the \n> original European spirit. Maybe the elites turn their backs on freedom, the public does not. In \n> my country, the Netherlands, 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of \n> Muslims as the number one policy mistake since  World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam \n> as the biggest threat to our national identity. I don’t think the public opinion in Holland is very \n> different from other European countries.\n> \n> Patriotic parties that oppose jihad are growing, against all odds. My own party debuted two years \n> ago, with five percent of the vote. Now it stands at ten percent in the polls. The same is true of \n> all smililary-minded parties in Europe. They are fighting the liberal establishment, and are \n> gaining footholds on the political arena, one voter at the time.\n> \n> Now, for the first time, these patriotic parties will come together and exchange experiences. It \n> may be the start of something big. Something that might change the map of Europe for decades to \n> come. It might also be Europe’s last chance. \n>  \n> a conference will be the start of an Alliance  of European patriots. This Alliance will serve as \n> the backbone for all organizations and political parties that oppose jihad and Islamization. For \n> this Alliance I seek your support.\n> \n> This endeavor may be crucial to America and to the West. America may hold fast to the dream \n> that, thanks tot its location, it is safe from jihad and shaira. But seven years ago to the day, \n> there was still smoke rising from ground zero, following the attacks that forever shattered that \n> dream. Yet there is a danger even greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America \n> as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic \n> Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual \n> nightmare, and a loss of military might for America - as its allies will turn into enemies, \n> enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic  Europe, it would be up to America alone to \n> preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem.\n> \n> Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this \n> freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their \n> lives. All throughout Europe American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it \n> home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation  does not own this freedom; we are merely its \n> custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe’s children in the same state in \n> which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations \n> would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.\n> \n> This is not the first time our civilization is under threat. We have seen dangers before. We \n> have been betrayed by our elites before. They have sided with our enemies before. And yet,  then, freedom\n> prevailed.\n> \n> These are not times in which to take lessons from appeasement, capitulation, giving away,  giving \n> up or giving in. These are not times in which to draw lessons from Mr. Chamberlain. These are \n> times calling us to draw lessons from Mr. Churchill and the words he spoke in 1942:\n> \n> “Never give in, never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never \n> give in except to convictions of honour and good  sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the \n> apparently overwhelming might of the enemy”.\n\n\n\n\n");
AddReply(349629,"norman1234@gmail.com","norman finkel","Tel-Aviv","10/07/08","ôøñåí úîåðúå ùì àééìåï öîåã ìîåñåìéðé äåà òìáåï ÷ùä ìãåö\'ä. àîðí äéä ôùéñè àê îòåìí ìà áâã áàøöå áðéâåã ìîø àééìåï. äãáø òìåì ìäáéà ìú÷øéú ãéôìåîèéú òí àéèìéä, àðé îöéò àôåà ìäñéø àú äúîåðä\nðåøîï");

WriteReplies(6,3061,iDiv);