
 sRepliesHTML = "";iReplies = 11;mReplies = iReplies;iDiv = 2901
AddReply(321445,"Smoke a cigar; it\'ll end soon!","Gary","Monterey, CA","07/08/08","");
AddReply(321341,"Great news!!","JTF","galut for now","07/07/08","For those who can read Hebrew, I present the following great news:\n\nhttp://www.ynet.co.il/articles/1,7340,L-3557780,00.html\n\nPerhaps time to switch allegiances Medad?   G-d willing, Hayamin Haamiti will grow larger and larger while the pesha council sinks!\n\n(The article discusses Noam Federman and heroic Jews of Hayamin Haamiti in Judea and Samaria calling on the Pesha-Council-traitors to resign for aiding Sharon in the expulsion of gush katif and northern Shomron).");
AddReply(321142,"Velvel, beats me.","sk","USA","07/07/08","I don\'t even remember what I wrote...\n\nThe ironic thing about Plaut is that he is so very campy.  Really, his column could be written by a witty drag queen.");
AddReply(321134,"Not really","YMedad","Shiloh","07/07/08","No computer where we are staying at my in-laws and the other computers I get for 10 minutes or so and I need more time to seaqrch, contemplate and fool around with the blog post system.  Be patient.");
AddReply(321070,"Computer","A reader","Israel","07/06/08","Why are you in a library to use a computer? Don\'t your friends and relatives in Manhatten have one?");
AddReply(320940,"sk, LOL why did plaut remove that entry?","velvel","silver spring","07/06/08","What did you say that got him so \"riled up?\"  The guy was destroyed for his rant against Natan zeda but he takes down the dana entry ?   You must have written something juicy about it..  At this point I don\'t even remember his entry or what it was about, but that visual seems to have unfortunately left a lasting impression.  That\'s the only thing I can remember about it! ");
AddReply(320805,"Actually","YMedad","Shiloh","07/05/08","Actually, I have a suspicion that either some people are overly negative just for the pleasyure of it and refuse to perceive anything worth cooperating on because they proceed from too rigid an ideoloigical position or they simply enjoy taking polar positions or they temselves have their own feelings of superiority.  I mean it can work both ways.  I try to base my conclusions on facts.  I can be wrong.  You can be wrong.  They can be wrong - as well as right.  Personal attack?  What attack cannot not be personal in some way?  Anyway, be well all of you.");
AddReply(320758,"I\'ll say something positive about Medad.","sk","USA","07/04/08","Unlike Plaut, who mostly writes drivel, Medad prints our criticisms (all of which are completely earned).  Plaut actually removed a whole blog entry on Dana International after refusing to print my own TB.\n\nHow Israeli of him.");
AddReply(320440,"To #1: The house SHOULD be divided...","Mike","Vienna, VA","07/03/08","...before there is a civil war, chas ve sholom!");
AddReply(320262,"You have fans, Yisrael?","sk","USA","07/03/08","");
AddReply(320118,"Fans/Detractors","Larry","(TA)","07/02/08","Well, I became a \'detractor\' after you mocked me personally. Until that point, I respected you. I still like Batya\'s stuff, but the overall feeling I get from the Meidad-Shiloh group is one of exhibiting superiority towards lesser Jews. If this be your attitude, then expect people to be more critical than they would be. \n\nYet the substance of most criticisms is still valid. After all, you are stating that you are against G Katif, against Amona, against further \'disengagements\' and settlement destruction. Fine. So the detractors are pointing out with close to full accuracy that the Yesha Council was a defacto accomplice, at least in the Disengagement. That\'s the reality; if you want to change it, great. \n\nI would love to change it, but as a secular nationalist I want the religious right to respect me. Otherwise, we\'ll remain a house divided.");

WriteReplies(6,2901,iDiv);