sRepliesHTML = "";iReplies = 38;mReplies = iReplies;iDiv = 2439
AddReply(255673,"No deals with Enemys of Real Israel","sue brown","Lubbock, Texas","12/09/07","B\"H\n   I don\'t understand this form of government in Israel.  If the USA had this kind of elections or people in high places we would have never become a nation. ");
AddReply(254911,"Ronit #32 Aliyah","Steve","Fla.","12/06/07","I have a couple interested in renting / leasing my small home and my small nursery business.  God-willing, I will make Aliyah.  To me the prospects of such a move are daunting.  \n\nThis (greenhouse nursery) is not an easy business.  I hope these two can handle it.  \n\nIsrael has a huge battle ahead.  I believe the battle is essentially lost here in the US.  Bush has turned our nation decidedly against Israel.");
AddReply(253997,"Not a Jew","Mike","Philadelphia","12/03/07","  Tamar,\nMs. Tzippi Livni, your foreign minister, and Former Prime Minister Ehud Barak are not Jews.  They are goons working for the Faux Jews like Henry Kissinger, the Rothschild’s and the ADL Jews who all give true Torah believing Jews a bad name.  They hide behind the true Jews, and then attack their enemies by accusing them of racism all the while they keep following the outline in the Protocols of Zion.  Substitute the word Zion for Sion, and Jew for the word Elite, and Gentile for peasant when you read the book, and you\'ll see it’s all happening all over the world.  Why else do they have all the free trade zones? You had a show months ago about a certain type of people who posed a Jews when delivered out from Egypt by God.  I don\'t remember what you called them, but you were asking your guest about how and when these prophesized people would manifest themselves again.  You know where this is heading.  The people who control the money want Israel to be a secular state, and the Vatican wants the Temple mount.  Once the Muslims control the Temple mount then the Vatican will dictate policy.  This Annapolis conference has instigated when the Italian police pulled their forces from the Synagogues and Hebrew schools, then the Italian press reported it as a potential terrorist target because these people were unprotected.  The same thing was going to happen all over Europe.\n");
AddReply(253994,"King Olmert, as that\'s the way he\'s acting.","Joseph A. Cleary","Sapulpa, Ok.","12/03/07","Dear Tamar:\n  Consult your friend, as a King is exactly how he\'s acting, he\'s had the police squelch all the evidence against him so there\'ll be no indictment against him. Plus he uses the IDF and the Massad for his own personal gain.\nChag Sameach.\nShalom, Shalom, Yosef ");
AddReply(253675,"A war approaches, unlike any seen since 1948.","Joseph A. Cleary","Sapulpa, Ok.","12/02/07","Dear Tamar:\n Confer with your friend reguarding that which approaches, the war.\n  The man, the Rabbi who\'s ill, he will recover for now but the next time he gets ill, he will pass. \n   The brain music idea is and old idea, as it is a form of hypnosis.\n    The Rabbi Lazer Brody, and the land of Israel you and he are right on.");
AddReply(253597,"Psstt  Somebody tell Rice that the Jews are the blacks and the Arabs a","satch","UK","12/02/07","");
AddReply(253543,"Aliyah","Ronit","settlement","12/02/07","Tamar, I too ,believe that if most of the world\'s Jews would make aliyah it would solve most of our problems here. The sad truth is that secular Jews in the Galut have absolutely no interest in living here (and in many cases don\'t ever come even to visit).As for the religious Jews, most of them are not making aliyah either. Either they are waiting for Meshiach, or have other excuses - like unable to give up their big, gorgeous homes and fancy cars and expensive clothes and jewelry. They love all of those things more than they love Eretz Yisrael. Also, I have chareidi relatives in Boro Park, Monsey, Lakewood, etc; they are not Satmar nor Neturei Karta, but you should hear them talk against living in Israel. Those of us who truly love Eretz Yisrael come to live here no matter which government we have. If we are not here, who will get the Land? The Arabs, that\'s who.");
AddReply(253506,"Gee, Steve","tamar y","","12/02/07","If I ever had a budget to get a research assistant, it would be you.  You are amazing!  ;-) \ntamar");
AddReply(253336,"Bush admin. Jew-hatred","Steve","Fla.","11/30/07","How low does this president have to sink for conservative American Jews and Christians to stop supporting him?\n \nSteve\n\nhttp://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1195546767168&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull\n \n\"This week the Bush Administration legitimized Arab anti-Semitism. In an effort to please the Saudis and their Arab brothers, the Bush administration agreed to physically separate the Jews from the Arabs at the Annapolis conference in a manner that aligns with the apartheid policies of the Arab world which prohibit Israelis from setting foot on Arab soil. \n \n\"Evident everywhere, the discrimination against Israel received its starkest expression at the main assembly of the Annapolis conference on Tuesday. There, in accordance with Saudi demands, the Americans prohibited Israeli representatives from entering the hall through the same door as the Arabs. Israel\'s humiliated foreign minister did not receive support from her American counterpart. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who spent her childhood years in the segregated American South, sided with the Arabs. \n\nAlthough polite enough to note that she doesn\'t support the slaughter of Israelis, she made no bones about the fact that her true sympathies lie with the racist Arabs. \n\nAs she put it, \"I know what it is like to hear that you cannot go on a road or through a checkpoint because you are a Palestinian. I understand the feeling of humiliation and powerlessness.\" \n \nRice\'s remarks make clear that for the Secretary of State there is no difference between Israelis trying to defend themselves from a jihadist Palestinian society which supports the destruction of the Jewish state and bigoted white Southerners who oppressed African Americans because of the color of their skin. It is true that Israel has security concerns, but as far as Rice is concerned, the Palestinians are the innocent victims. They are the ones who are discriminated against and humiliated, not Livni who was forced - by Rice - to enter the conference through the service entrance.......");
AddReply(253210,"apology","karenJohnson","shreveport,la.71108","11/30/07","what i said about tzippi was wrong\ncalling her a homo, i should have said homosexual, which is\nwhat i think she is .or gay what ever .\nif she is .she should pray for gudience\nand a husband.allso resign from office because shes hurting Israel.");
AddReply(252992,"\"Rice, shame on you!\"","","","11/29/07","(This is why I maintain Mr. Bush is an anti-Semite.  He employs anti-Semites like Rice.)\n\nhttp://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1195546758539&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull\n\n\"(Rice) added, however, that as a black child in the South, forbidden to use certain water fountains and shunned from certain restaurants, she was also in a good position to understand the feelings of the Palestinians. \n\n\"I know what it is like to hear to that you cannot go on a road or through a checkpoint because you are Palestinian,\" she said. \"I understand the feeling of humiliation and powerlessness.\" \n\n\nTalkback #7. How dare Rice compare the formerly segragated southern USA with Israeli security measures! \nOhev Tsion - Israel \n11/29/2007 12:27 \n\nThe American south was segragated because of white racism against blacks. Israel maintains its checkposts, etc. only as a security precaution against Palestinian terrorists and not because of racism - we do it to save our own lives and not to deliberately hurt or insult anyone. If Rice doesn\'t understand this then she\'s even more confused than we\'ve presumed her to be. \n\n9. Condi\'s Black/Palestinian analogy WRONG \nJames - USA \n11/29/2007 12:32 \n\nCondi\'s black/Palestinian analogy is totally off the mark. Southern blacks were discriminated against because of an unjust racist policy perpetrated by the US government, not because of anything the blacks had done. The blacks were completely blameless victims. The Palestinians, on the other hand, are \"discriminated against\" ONLY because of their eagerness to committ acts of terrorism against Israel. If they would renounce their terrorist ways, the \"discrimination\" would end. \n\n13. What the hell is RIce talking about?? \nAriel - Israel \n11/29/2007 12:39 \n\nRice is crazy and dangerous. If she thinks that the Israeli / Arab conflict has anything to do with the Jim Crow South she is badly mistaken. Livni is a fool. She doesn\'t realize that the most important thing for Muslims is to humiliate Jews and women. Livni, come home and help us fight these murderers, instead of trying to appease them. Deal with them with strengh, and they will kiss your feet. Show them weakness, and you will find spit on your face. That is the Arab/Muslim mentality! \n\n\n15. Rice Shame on You! \nAlbert Reingewirtz - USA \n11/29/2007 12:48 \n\nIsraeli Arabs can go anywhere in Israel. They are elected to the Knesset, serve in the foreign office. One is a minister. Palestinians can\'t use certain roads not because they are Arabs but because they in fact Kill Israeli\'s. No handshake with Jews is like not drinking from the same fountain of your youth. Synagogues destroyed is like your youth church bombing. Shame on you! \n\n21. Rice\'s analogies to the civil rights struggle are just obscene \nMHL \n11/29/2007 12:59 \n\nComparing the Arab-Israeli conflict to the US civil right struggle prove that Rice is not only dishonest and/or stupid, but underscores why she should be removed from involvement in Arab-Israeli negotiations. The US civil rights movement was not a genocidal movement aiming to kill all whites and remove them from their homeland, as is the Arab fight against the Jews. Nor are the Arabs led by anyone like Martin Luther KIng - rather they are led by violent psychopathetic thugs. ");
AddReply(252988,"Tamar: my position on Sharon","Steve","Fla.","11/29/07","I listened to you and Tovia last night, \"Who do they think they are?\"\n\nI did not write that Ariel Sharon campaigned on a platform of \"disengagement,\" 2002 through early 2003.  \n\nI take you, Tovia Singer, Paul Eidelberg and others at your word.  What Sharon did campaign on is that Israel would have to make \"painful concessions\" (the same language Olmert is now using) and \"a Palestinian state is inevitable.\"  This is fact.\n\nhttp://web.israelinsider.com/Views/1670.htm\n\"....Though long identified with the West Bank settlement movement, Sharon rarely invokes settlements anymore. Instead, he has taken on his own party\'s hard-liners, led by Netanyahu, who oppose a Palestinian state. \n\n\"Sharon now concedes that a Palestinian state is inevitable....\"\n\nThis is all I needed to hear from Sharon.  To me, the fact that Sharon did not specify how he would work to establish a Palestinian terrorist state -- that he condemned Mitzna\'s disengagement plan -- was not relevant. \n\nThe same holds true for Bush.  Bush can declare, \"Israel is our friend...I\'m going to stand by Israel,\" etc., all day long.  \n\nWhen he made known his plan to establish a Palestinian terrorist state days after the September 11, 2001 atrocities, he became an enemy; my enemy.\n\nI am listening to Tovia interviewing Dr. Steve Carol this morning.  Carol alleges Bush turned against Israel in the summer of 2006 during the second Lebanon war.  \n\nI beg to differ.  Bush turned against Israel only days after assuming office.  I listened to this anti-Semite scold and condemn the Jewish state after each and every bloody suicide bombing, early 2001, 2002, 20003, 2004.... Dr. Carol is wrong.  George W. Bush has never has been \"supportive\" of Israel.  It\'s all empty rhetoric.\n\nBush, like his father and close friend, James Baker III, is an anti-Semite in my opinion.  His plan to dismantle and destroy the Jewish state is the natural outcome of his Jew hatred.");
AddReply(252959,"Believer","Milko","Vancouver","11/29/07","Dear Tamar, sorry for wrong spelling yesterday;( holy God, not holly God!)\nGod bless, Milko!");
AddReply(252919,"Mr. Pollard is a Pawn that the US gov. uses.","Joseph A. Cleary","Sapulpa, Ok.","11/29/07"," Dear Tamar:\n   Mr. Pollard will only be freed when the US has no further use for him, I regret to say.\n   Mr. Pollard is worth more than ten of any of those who you\'re willing to trade. \n   I regret to say any and all of the ones who you want to trade were bought and paid for so they wouldn\'t want them except where they can be of use, not having them over here. \n   I listened to the TnT show, Great Show, right up until the Rabbi asks to be blessed where you sign off.\nShalom, Shalom, Yosef ");
AddReply(252817,"Believer","Milko","Vancouver","11/28/07","It makes my stomach turn when I see the events about Isreal!\nBut it is writen and is going to get worse, most Israelis religous leaders sold out to gouverment, have and will bow to Pope-Vatican. But there is a very small group in Israel that will not bow. Watch for Popes secret document on this Friday! PS: Get rid of this rock music on your show. The G-d of Isreal is a holly God, and expects His people to live holly! What I see in Israel is anything but holliness, the same as it is with so colled Christians. God hates that-bunch of religious actors. God only respect Truth, His Word and sincerety, the rest is hell bound!\nGod bless and keep you by His grace! Your Friend, Milko!");
AddReply(252765,"Re: Gang Rape in Annapolis","Steve","Fla.","11/28/07","I read this comment on Gaffney\'s piece, Israelinsider. This reader has a valid point.  Once yet again Gaffney gave Bush a pass as did Michael Freund in his piece today.  It is as though Rice were the president and Bush her employee:\n(End)\n\n(ED. note)The Following from: http://web.israelinsider.com/views/12410.htm\n\n\"Earth to Frank... Hello?\nezekielinusa - U.S.A \n11/28/2007 15:44 IT   \n\nZero mention of the Invisible Man, \nPresident Bush... Yes, blame it all on Condi... she did it all while Bush was sleeping? \n\nFrank, you are a pathetic, cowardly apologist for an evil President Bush. \nMaking excuses for the devil? \n\nYou keep on writing your \n\'expert analysis\' and making excuses again and again for Bush. \nWhy do you do that Frank? \nI suppose your friends will be satisfied with your lies and half-truths and omissions... they may even send you a donation towards the costs of running your Center for Security Policy (Ha ha! What irony in the name) very discreetly, of course. \n\nMaybe 30 pieces of silver is still the going rate for those who betray Israel? \n\nPerhaps a bit more these days, especially as the Dollar is losing its value? \n\nI hope it\'s worth it to you, Frank. \nWhatever they are paying you to write this garbage... its not worth it. You will be sorry one day.\" \nFrom: http://web.israelinsider.com/views/12410.htm (ed. note)\n");
AddReply(252695,"caretaker","karen Johnson","shreveport","11/28/07","like wine you get better with time.\n\nyour right on the money.\n\nyou got tzippi a homo--\n\nand the other sale out. what party?\n\n");
AddReply(252587,"Jerusalem for Pollard...","Lenny Solomon","Bet Shemesh","11/28/07","I figured that in order for Olmert to do what he wants to do which is to give it all away he would bring back Pollard as a prize and then say \"See l did what no other PM did in the last 22 years\"   - But it seems like he could not care less about JP or about us!");
AddReply(252509,"Gang rape in Annapolis (worth reading)","Steve","Fla.","11/28/07","http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20071127/COMMENTARY03/111270009/1012/COMMENTARY ");
AddReply(252504,"Only on the condition","Melinda Lehan","Smalltown,U.S.","11/28/07","That you and Tovia come with them to beat them across the behind and ya take A.C.L.U. the muslems, the atheists, Hollywood, the Scientologist, the N.O.W.s.,Clintons about 80 % of our  politicians and the majority of our Supreme Court Judges.");
AddReply(252497,"Brilliant--don\'t forget","Brooke","","11/28/07"," to throw in Beillin & Peres---no extra charge!!\n \n");
AddReply(252467,"Tamar #8","Steve","Fla.","11/27/07","Thanks so much for the detailed response.  Yes I am aware of much of this.  I am also aware of the Likud special referendum that went decidedly against Sharon.  Like Olmert, Sharon was corrupt and he did all kinds of sneaky things such as fire cabinet ministers that did not go along with him and he offered bribes, etc., to keep his coalition together.  I blame Netanyahu for much of this.  He did not lead.\n\nSadly a mother and her three (?) daughters were murdered that morning by terrorists in Gaza.  This is what I mean by the fickleness of the voters, as you say.  Had that murder not occurred, the vote might have gone the other way.  Most Jews do not have any depth of faith or ideological conviction, sadly.\n\nAs to your point about Sharon changing and adopting Mitzna\'s plan, this is a fine point but to me it is not fundamental and I will explain why.\n\nPaul has changed his position since 2003 election in January.  The reason I know is, I was on his mailing list at the time.  He was having this huge debate before the elections with Gary Cooperberg, Hebron.   Gary was urging the right to vote for Sharon because \"a vote\" for a small principled party like Michael Kleiner\'s Herut, in Gary\'s opinion, \"would be a vote for Mitzna and therefore a wasted vote.\"\n\nI hope Mr. Cooperberg learned his lesson from that bit of  foolishness.  Tamar, we should never vote for evil.  Sharon was evil in 2003 because he made his evil plans known.  \n\nNever vote for the lessor of the evils unless the other evil is going to kill you and your family.\n\nEidelberg on the other hand was properly urging the right to vote for small, principled right-leaning parties in order to get a foot-hold in the government.  Eidelberg rightly reminded Gary Cooperberg that Sharon campaigned he would make \"painful concessions\" and that a \"Palestinian state was inevitable.\"\n\nLike Bush, Tamar, Sharon made his intention to begin establishing a Palestinian terrorist state!  Throughout 2002 and early 2003 Sharon campaigned as someone who would help Bush establish his \"vision\" of a Palestinian terrorist state in Israel.  \n\nHow exactly Sharon would move forward once he was re-elected was not the important point.  \n\nDoes this make sense, what I am saying?  So what if he condemned Mitzna\'s disengagement plan?  That\'s the meaningless rhetoric of politicians.  The all important point is  Sharon campaigned that he would expel Jews from somewhere in Israel.   This is treason.\n\nHow can Paul Eidelberg now insist that people did not vote for expulsion when in fact they did when they voted for Sharon?\n\nHe said exactly what he would do.  What more did the Jews in Israel need to hear?  This lesson I have had to learn.  When a leader says something, take him at his word.  Ahmadinejad says he wants to wipe Israel off the map.  Do you take him at his word?  I do and yet there are many people saying, \"Oh he did not mean that!\"  How many people said this about Adolf Hitler?\n\nSharon said what he\'d do if re-elected and he carried through on his promise.\n\nI don\'t understand Paul\'s new position.  I do not understand his revisionist history and I wrote him to this effect.  How could any Jew say they voted for Bush in 2004 -- thus re-electing Bush -- and now insist they did not vote for expulsion of Jews from our land?  Bush announced his plans to establish a Palestinian terrorist state only days after 9/11/2001.  He put it in our national party platform, Aug, 2004 before the November elections.  \n\nHello!  Is anyone home?\n\nI am sorry that instead of turning the page in 2004, I did not vote for John Kerry.  Bush needed to be removed from office.  So did Sharon in 2003 because in 2002 he campaigned on the platform of a Palestinian terrorist state. \n\nThe details; whether he used the word \"disengagement\" is irrelevant, it seems to me.  What Sharon began in Gaza, Olmert is trying to continue in Judea, Samaria and east Jerusalem.  Sharon campaigned on and began the process of establishing Bush\'s vision.  For Professor Eidelberg to insist otherwise is revisionist history.  He is not being honest in my opinion.");
AddReply(252453,"To#12:  I will post what I posted on Fishman\'s blog","mike","Vienna, VA","11/27/07","Are you prepared to spit on and burn the Israeli flag? Are you prepared to call soldiers of the Tzahal \"occupiers\", to spit on them, slap them, throw garbage at them and daily demand that they get out of your country? Are you prepared to force every Jew in Yesha to leave the Tzahal and the police or to provide arms, cover and information? Are you prepared to force every parent in Yesha to keep his children out of the Tzahal? Do you understand the methods this would require and are you prepared to use them? Are you prepared to greet every Israeli military and police vehicle with a barrage of rocks? Are you prepared to refuse service in the Tzahal? Are you prepared to steal and buy weapons from Israeli soldiers and police? Are you prepared to turn the Jewish towns of Yesha into no-go zones for Israeli security forces? Are you prepared to train covertly, knowing that there is a Basic Law prohibiting all armed formations except the Tzahal and understanding the penalties for breaking this Basic Law? Would you proudly fly the flag of Judah when doing so guarantees arrest under Israeli treason laws and a prossible death penalty? Are you prepared for armed resistance when the Israelis come with tanks and helicopters? Would you even come out and peacefully demonstrate for a sovereign Medinat Yehudah?\n\nOr do you still think of yourselves as Israeli? Consider your answers to these questions. Consider how your neighbors would answer them. Consider how most Jews reading this blog would answer them. Understand why I do not make aliyah.");
AddReply(252446,"to Tirtza # 12","Rob","usa","11/27/07","Because Mike is a whimp who is  gets his jolly\'s by discouraging Aliyah and slanders the Jewish people by spreading His anti-Jewish , conspiracy laced diatribe.");
AddReply(252442,"Yisrael #2: Olmert and Jerusalem","Steve","Fla.","11/27/07","I took Olmert\'s statement, \"Jerusalem is an Israeli issue, not a Jewish one,\" differently than you did.\n\nI fully intend to immigrate to Israel.  Meanwhile I am here.  I\'m not looking forward to making Aliyah to a greatly truncated Israel with enemies taking possession of our land.\n\nSeems to me Olmert has no right to give our God-given land to Israel\'s enemies much less to our no-Jewish friends.  The land belongs to God.  He gave it to Abraham and to his descendants forever; to the Jews.\n\nThe land of Israel belongs to all Jews for all time.  If Olmert is saying Israelis will decide the disposition of the land through elections, still this does not give him the right to give our land away.\n\nHe seemed however to be saying that Jews have no right to even express an opinion unless it is through the Democratic process in Israel.  \n\nThis is a lie.  Jews not only have the right to express their opinion regarding on our land but an obligation to warn Olmert that he will pay a heavy price for this criminal act.\n");
AddReply(252436,"Throw in Ramon, Peres & You Have a Deal!","American","India","11/27/07","");
AddReply(252404,"To Mike of Vienna VA","Tirtza","Yesha","11/27/07","If you want Medinat Yehudah so much why don\'t you come here and help make it happen. My family, friends, and I are here on the front lines. And where are you??");
AddReply(252393,"Olmert","Yiska","Yesha","11/27/07","I vote for Olmert to be Prime Minister of the Pal. Arabs. He seems to be doing everything to help them, and not us, the citizens of his country. Abu-Mazen just said that we should go back to the pre-1948 borders. Olmert will probably agree with him.");
AddReply(252381,"What a deal!","ROGER","Minneapolis, MN","11/27/07","I MUST be a pain the the a-- to the ruling elites here in the US.  Could you throw me in the deal for free?  Then I won\'t be around to send \'em any more pro-Israel e-mails/ letters/ phone calls?");
AddReply(252378,"Mike","jew","in israel ","11/27/07","Mike, in order to implement a state called Judea, you would have to have the means to accomplish it. A shadow government would need to be formed, and an infrastructure in place, to take over and actually run a country.  We can\'t do that at this point.  We need more people (like you?) here to make it happen.  We are not large enough yet OR  set up, to run a new state. If Jews came to live here, it would change everything.");
AddReply(252370,"answer to Steve","tamar yonah","","11/27/07","Shalom Steve,\nI know Prof. Eidelberg to be a religious and G-d fearing Jew.  I think that when he states the need for a more honest government, he is doing so from an academic view point, working through natural ways.  I am sure that he would be much happier ushering in the Moshiach to lead us all. (smile)\n\nAs for Ariel Sharon, he ran in two elections.  The first one I believe,  was against Ehud Barak in 2001. He ran again in 2003 against Amram Mitzna.  Mitzna ran on the platform of disengaging from parts of Gaza.  Ariel Sharon ran on the exact opposite platform. In fact, if you want to hear great speeches against disengagement, one should listen to Ariel Sharon\'s election campaign speeches!  \nSee Wikipedia:\n\n\"During campaigning for the 2003 elections, Mitzna proposed that Israel pursue further negotiations with the Palestinian Authority, but if they failed to yield a solution, that Israel withdraw from the Gaza Strip and most of the West Bank, and unilaterally set its final borders. His position was lambasted by Likud leader Ariel Sharon, though later (after he was elected) implemented by him as the disengagement plan.\"\n\nSo, you see that Sharon went AGAINST what he was voted in for.  In fact, even after he was voted in, he made a referendum in the likud, whether to go for disengagement or not, as there was an uproar from the people.  I personally voted in that referendum, and we won, Ariel Sharon lost, yet he bulldozed Mitzna\'s platform on us anyway. You see, the Israeli people were going to get disengagement WHOEVER they voted for!  Both candidates were probably puppets of the same people.\n\n The public today, is so brainwashed, not only in Israel, but everywhere, that they eat whatever they are fed by the media.  Therefore, even if there is true democracy, people can and are manipulated.  Just look at the American voters.  Anyone who dares to think out of the box or ask questions is considered a trouble maker, a conspiracy theorist, or a nut.  They are not thought of as individual thinkers, intellectuals, or people who don\'t blindly follow the crowd.  They are derided.  Did you ever see the movie \"V\" for Vendetta?  Great movie!  You should all see it.");
AddReply(252359,"To#4: A Jewish State will","mike","Vienna, VA","11/27/07","I will never move to today\'s Israel.  Medinat Yehudah is a different story.  Make no mistake about it, Judah, if there are guts enough in Yesha to build it, will be a \"rogue state\" under sanctions and siege, engaged in constant battle for survival, with a largely command economy focused almost entirely on military production, with smuggling as the chief source of revenue and raw materials, with rationing and hunger constant companions.  Yet I would drop everything and come to Judah.  But I will not come to sit and wait passively for death in the noodle shops of Israeli Tel Aviv.\n\nTrust me, I am not alone.");
AddReply(252357,"answer to Yisrael","tamar yonah","","11/27/07","Shalom Yisrael,\nI was just interviewed for an hour on american radio regarding Annapolis, Olmert, and exactly what you wrote- regarding Olmert saying Jews in America have no say in what will be the fate of Jerusalem. \nI am looking at this from a little different angle than what you wrote.  I told the American listeners that Ehud Olmert has no right to make such a  statement.  We have a large number of Moslem voters in Israel, and we cannot have our prime minister state that in essence, Jerusalem and Israel lies in the hands of  Arab-Israeli and  Moslem voters.  In addition, I stated that NO ONE has the right to give up any land, or to divide Jerusalem.  The Land of Israel belongs to all Jews, wherever they are, and not only that, but to all the future generations of Jews who have not been born yet. Olmert nor anyone, has the right to give up land.  Now, Yisrael you are indeed correct,,,  Jews in the Exile MUST make aliyah, and vote with their feet, because this is the sad reality - people like Olmert will appoint a moslem to be a minister of the Jewish people.  \n\nThe fact is, that if the religious Jewish American community made aliyah, we would OWN this country and it would be a different reality today.  The Jews overseas mistakenly claim: \"We are here to protect Israel, to lobby for Israel\'s interests, etc\"  Well, they are not doing a very good job of it, are they?\nMy brothers and sisters, come home.  And to Yisrael, feel free to write something yourself, and I will be happy to post it on the blog.");
AddReply(252313,"Tamar: your interview with Paul Eidelberg","Steve","Fla.","11/27/07","Tamar, I fear Professor Eidelberg is mistaken about the wisdom of \"the people.\"  If only Israel were more \"democratic\" like the US, then Israel\'s government would be more accountable to public opinion. \n\'Because the people is the repository of wisdom and good judgment\' in the professor\'s eyes.\n\nLike others, I watch the polls in Israel.  Public opinion swings like a pendulum depending upon the mood or the Jews on a given day or if there was a recent bloody terrorist attack or a lull in the violence.\n\nDo you trust in the goodness and the wisdom of the people like Paul Eidelberg?  You and Tovia tell us we should look up and trust in God. \n\nEidelberg says, \"NO.\"  Place your trust in the people.  \n\nI have no problem with political reform in Israel.  Reform away.  My guess is, Paul Eidelberg will bring us the same result.  Is Bush any less corrupt and compromised than Olmert?  I fear not.\n\nProfessor Eidelberg insists the Jews did not vote for \"disengagement\" in the 2003 elections.  He said the same thing last week in an interview with Tovia Singer.\n\nI beg your pardon.  Ariel Sharon campaigned (2002-2003) on a platform that we have to make \"painful concessions\" and that a \"Palestinian state is inevitable.\"\n\nSharon made it clear enough.  Every Jew on the right that voted for Likud, led by Sharon in 2003, voted for expulsion and retreat.  Why does Paul Eidelberg insist otherwise. ");
AddReply(252282,"Aliyah","Revital","Beersheva","11/27/07","Most Jews in the world would rather live anyplace other than Israel,i.e.  the U.S., Canada, Australia, England, etc. etc. I can\'t think of anything that would cause them to make aliyah.");
AddReply(252231,"Naw !","Rob","usa","11/27/07","");
AddReply(252204,"We don\'t have enough money....","Yisrael","P\"T","11/27/07","for the Americans to take these buffoons off our hands.\nJ.Pollard is worth 1000\'s of such incompetants.\nJ.P. gave classified US information to Israel, to help the Israeli government defend itself, and he did this at his own risk of 20years  in jail.\nHe worked for Israel\'s benefit, these 3 work against it.\n\nTamar, please write a blog to American/World Jewry on Olmert\'s statement that \"Jerusalem is an Israeli issue, not a Jewish one\".\nHe is right, we live in a democracy where we have secular leaders thanks to Torah Jews not making aliyah. We always knew - if you want to count in this world as a Jew on Jewish/Israel issues then you had better make aliyah quick and vote.\nOlmert said it better than Tzvi or any Aliyah Shliach.\nOlmert stuck it to the OU - maybe they will make aliyah now?");
AddReply(252167,"What about Peres ? appoint him as special envoy to Mars ?","Dan","Jerusalem","11/27/07","");

WriteReplies(6,2439,iDiv);