sRepliesHTML = "";iReplies = 10;mReplies = iReplies;iDiv = 8403
AddReply(367280,"To Shy guy, # 9","Ole Kohane","","12/02/08","You and I may know the facts, however, most Christians and Messianic Protestants, and too many Jews, cannot put this part of 2 and 2 together. It is for those people, not the ones who have already connected the dots, that I write to. \n\nBrevity, and assumed commentary does not always answer the questions of the lesser learned. It is they who need the extra time and patience.");
AddReply(367205,"Kohane, to sum up your 2 long posts in less than 60 words","Shy Guy","Jerusalem","12/02/08","2nd commandment of the Ten Commandments.\n\nThe rest is commentary.");
AddReply(367071,"Ellen is right: Judaism vs Christianity cont. pt 2","An ole Kohane","","12/02/08","Moreover, Christianity uses the “holy ghost”, or “holy spirit” to condemn those who question the validity of their case. Irresponsibly, Christians claim the Christian religion is based upon the Hebrew Creator, the One who called Abraham, Isaac and Jacob to be His people... and told them (the Hebrews) not to worship any other “God”. \n\nSince the Christian holy spirit is of a ‘feminine’ gender, by the fact that the TANAKH never, ever assigns the “Ruach Haqodesh” a masculine gender, or even hints that this Christian invention is “a person”, or has a “personality” (although Christians will foolishly swear the TANAKH does) then according to the Hebrew TANAKH, the Christian’s “holy spirit” is of female gender by DEFAULT. Which means the Christian/Messianic Protestant “god” is NOT the Hebrew Creator. \n\nHebrew marriage, the picture of relationship between HaShem and the Hebrews, allows the husband, in some cases, to have more than one wife. However, no exception is ever made for the wife to have multiple husbands simultaneously. \n\nNor, is any allowance made for any divine being, other than HaShem, to act as groom, or mediator, between the Hebrew and HaShem without HaShem’s direction written within the TANAKH. \n\nSince neither “Christianity” nor “Jesus” are clearly identified and addressed within the TANAKH, then no Hebrew person can embrace any sect of Christianity, or Messianic-protestant-evangelical with approval from HaShem. Nowhere does the TANAKH support the doctrinal atrocities claimed by any sect of Christianity. \n\nThus, there are 2 words for Jews who make alliances with Christians: VERY FOOLISH!\n\n\n");
AddReply(367069,"Ellen is right: Judaism vs Christianity, pt one","An ole Kohane","","12/02/08","When a Hebrew woman becomes contractually bound in marriage, or to become married, she must abandon all ties to any other man outside of her family unit. Moreover, her family bonds become secondary to her matrimonial bond. Her husband, ideally, becomes best friend, confidant, and the center of her universe.\n\nThe institution of marriage pictures the contractual relationship between the Hebrew nation (the wife) and HaShem (the groom). Which is precisely why HaShem does not allow the Hebrew people to marry outside of their religion. The Hebrew people bound themselves and their posterity at Sinai. Therefore, it is a violation of the continuing contract for any Hebrew person to marry outside the bounds, parameters, and wishes of HaShem.\n\nIn this eternal marriage between the Hebrew people and their Master, the Torah was given as the guidelines of the connection between Hebrew person and his Creator. Which explains why true Hebrew worshippers cannot accept Christianity. Christianity removes the guidelines, which is to the Hebrew their lifeline. Christians falsely claim, “God broke the original covenant between Himself and the Jews”. This false assumption allows Christians the luxury of teaching “replacement Theology”.\n\nIn other words, Christianity seeks to put their god “Jesus” a.k.a. Jesu, etc. between the Hebrew and his Creator. Research proves the Jesuit “Jesu”, or Jesus, are none other than synonyms for Jupiter. This fact can be found by simply researching the ancient Greek, Latin, and English languages.\n");
AddReply(366753,"To anonymous, #5","Shy Guy","Jerusalem","12/01/08","1. We\'re pretty much in full agreement.\n\n2. Use a name or at least a nickname when you post. ;)");
AddReply(366751,"To Shy Guy (#4)","","","12/01/08","Don\'t think this is what Rav Soloveitchik meant when he said dialogue, except when discussing faith. Sure you realize that there is a tremendous amount of missionizing going on. They provide for the needy, knowing full well\nthat most are either Russian immigrants or the elderly & feel they make good prey for evangelzing their faith.  They have also inserted themselves into the  politics of Israel, giving them power in Israel (the \'Jewish\' State). Sure, you also know that Yad L\'Achim is busier than ever before helping to stem the tide of shmad going on. If the evangelicals really want to help; they can help from afar.\n");
AddReply(366710,"To anonymous poster #2 - interfaith dialogue","Shy Guy","Jerusalem","12/01/08","Rav Y.B. Soloveitchik Z\"L, whom Ellen mentions in the article, forbade interfaith dialogue dealing with theological matters. As Ellen mentions, Rav Soloveitchik Z\"L did approve of interfaith cooperation in common humanitarian matters. \n\nLet\'s not move the red line up or down but maintain it where it belongs. Ellen\'s point is that the line has become blurred over the last several years.\n\nEllen has redrawn the line with a big red marker, so no one can excuse themselves anymore that they didn\'t see it.");
AddReply(366668,"The OU","Chaya","NYC","12/01/08","You seem surprised and/or disappointed. The OU has a track record for being passive on major issues concerning Israel. Remember the expulsion in Gush Katif.  They turned a blind eye/deaf ear. They did nothing to help their brethern at such a crucial time and never condemned the expulsion until it was too late. They are a very powerful organization but their loyalty was with the criminal Ehud Olmert whom they hosted at their annual dinner and to whom they gave a standing ovation.  Repulsive. Talking about lacking backbone, isn\'t it ironic the OU, the world-wide symbol of kashrut, just last year ABSTAINED on a vote whether or not to divide Jerusalem (chas v\'shalom).\nYou are too kind when you label them \"pareve\". The OU is all about Power, Politics and the Pursuit of (more) money. To me this spells \"TREIF\".  But who is going to take them on?????\n");
AddReply(366605,"Perfect to the Point Article","","","12/01/08","As usual E.Horowitz articles come right to the heart of the matter.  She is absolutely correct. The G\'dolei Hador warned, very adamantly, not to have any kind of dialogue with clergy of other faiths.  The OU is a religious body; how can we trust their certification if they have no respect for the core of our Torah - namely, kedushat Eretz Yisroel.  One cannot sell land in Eretz Yisroel to non-Jews.  Taking money from them is a chilul Hashem.  We have the Ribono Shel Olam to rely on.  This is such an abomination (don\'t know what else to call it), especially when the OU or any other religious organization puts aside its reason for being to be politically correct.  Fear of Heaven is all that matters.\n");
AddReply(366591,"True Identity","Schvach","","11/30/08","I\'ve posted a too-long-for-this- site comment at:\nhttp://schvach.blogspot.com/2008/11/true-identity-by-schvach-yid-ellen-w.html");

WriteReplies(1,8403,iDiv);