sRepliesHTML = "";iReplies = 39;mReplies = iReplies;iDiv = 7816
AddReply(312972,"Israel land","Charlie Balthrop","Oklahoma City","06/05/08","I am a conservative Christian.  My bible says that God gave Isreal land for each of the twelve tribes and identified the borders.\nIsreal should demand and secure their God given land.  Should the USA oppose Isreal our nation will fall.");
AddReply(286673,"Mccain strongly committed to not freeing prisoner Jonathan Pollard.","Velvel","silver spring","03/13/08","Unfortunately Mccain will not free Pollard. He has made this very clear.  I hope he will at least back off and stop promoting this fake peace nonsense.");
AddReply(286110,"# 36 comment","Yehoshua","Ormond Beach","03/12/08","So, that leaves us with Honigman\'s article intact as written...Maybe someone else sent Sen. McCain a copy of his piece. I know Honigman himself did and received a reply from McCain\'s staff which was not just a form letter.");
AddReply(285636,"#26","J. Feigenbaum","Chicago","03/11/08","Mr. Oren is a leftist, anti-settler journalist from Haaretz. It is not entirely inconceivable that Oren would spin his interview against McCain if he perceived McCain to be aligned with the  nationalistic Israeli right. I therefore submitted McCain\'s rebuttal to Oren\'s interview. However, it seems this is not the end of the story. The following is from \'www.dailykos.com/story/ 2008/2/29/84945/8084 online: \n\"Antisemitic, Israel hater, James Baker III endorsed John McCain for President. I call on John McCain to denounce AND reject James Baker, who once said: \"F-ck the Jews. They didn\'t vote for us anyway.\" And...\"Don\'t worry, Jews remember the Holocaust, but they forget insults as soon as they smell cash.\" [N.Y. Post, March 6, 1992]. And McCain has said he\'d send Baker to the middle east as his envoy to Israel. Even though, he now is lying and pretending otherwise. This week, Senator John McCain took heat because of an interview that he granted two years ago to Amir Oren, a credible journalist from the Israeli newspaper HaAretz, on May 1, 2006, in which Mr.McCain declared that his administration \"would\nsend\"the smartest guy I know\" to the Middle East .. \"Brent Scowcroft, or Jim Baker though I know that you in Israel don\'t like Baker.\"\nWhen Mr. Oren asked Mr. McCain if that meant a \"movement toward the June 4, 1967 armistice lines, with minor modifications? McCain nodded in the affirmative.\"\nTo deflect criticism that he has encountered on the 2008 campaign trail, the McCain campaign has been quoting an article by John B. Judis., senior editor at The New Republic who wrote in an article in that publication on October 25, 2006 that Mr. McCain was \"miffed at his portrayal in HaAretz,\" saying that \"after reading the HaAretz article and subsequent report in The Jewish Press [in New York],\" he felt the need to \"clear up several serious misimpressions.\" Mr. McCain said that \"in contrast to the impression left by the HaAretz article, I\'ve never held the position that Israel should return to 1967 lines, and that is not my position today.\" The senator repeated this week what he said to the New Republic which was that \n\"in the course of that brief, off-the-cuff conversation, I never discussed settlement blocs, a total withdrawal, or anything of the sort.\"\nReached at his desk in Tel Aviv, Mr. Oren told The Bulletin that Mr. McCain is simply \"not telling the truth\", and that he would gladly invite him to a polygraph to see who is telling the truth. He said Mr. McCain indeed recommended Mr. Baker and Mr. Snowcroft as his potential candidates to deal with the Middle East, and that he clearly answered in the affirmative when it came to Mr. McCain\'s expectations of Israel, and how it should relate to further withdrawals. Mr. Oren said that Mr. McCain stated clearly that Israel\'s policy should be one of \"defending itself and withdrawing, defending itself and withdrawing.\" Far from an off the cuff conversation, Mr. Oren told the Bulletin that this was a formal interview that Mr. McCain provided him at the the Brussels Forum for American-European Relations, following an interview that Mr. McCain provided to the Washington Post. Mr. Oren mentioned to the Bulletin that the interview was conducted in the presence of Mr. McCain\'s aide, Richard Fontaine. Scowcroft and Baker are widely mistrusted in Israel.\"\nMcCain said he\'ll be traveling\nto Israel soon, presumably to\nmitigate the mess his remarks have created. He has yet to openly reject Baker as chief mideast expert and advisor.\n\n\n");
AddReply(285575,"Ditto #24","Victor Passenheim","Orlando, FL","03/10/08","Ditto #24");
AddReply(285434,"Howard #25","meira","tampastan bay","03/10/08","yes you should. think about this. will you be able to go depending who becomes pres? I think it\'s only if somehow Hilary wins would we have a small window of time to leave here. Think about it. it takes a while to organize aliyah.");
AddReply(285431,"Louise","meira","tampastan bay","03/10/08","I sincerely hope you don\'t mean Ron Paul.  That would be an even bigger mistake.  ");
AddReply(285408,"Israel is not the 51st state of America","Jew","Israel","03/10/08","So who cares who the president of America is? America is not a true friend of Israel, no president will put Israel\'s interests before America\'s, so let\'s focus our efforts on dealing with the corruption so widespread in Israel. That\'s the genuine life-and-death issue for Jews.");
AddReply(285404,"Excellent Arrticle by Mr Honigman","Ellie","Florida ","03/10/08","Truth was spoken; I do not like James Baker, and I too was concerned that Mr. McCain may choose him. I pray he won\'t, that he will see the disapproval and rethink! What a dilemma; I can\'t vote for Hillary or Obama. ISRAEL must stand against those who push again\'t the borders already gained. I wonder if we aren\'t very close to the \"time of Jacob\'s trouble\", because all is stacking against Israel. ");
AddReply(285170,"thank you","tkgriff","portland","03/10/08","the choice i have facing me in 2008 is best. your straightening out this report is timely. not a baker fan! let G-D protect his truth  and let liars be exposed for thase who love it. again  thank you");
AddReply(284936,"Well said","Johnny","Greenville","03/09/08","Well said.  I am one American who will do just that, vote for no one given the sentiments stated in the opinion.  Hope this opinion posting gets to McCain.");
AddReply(284825,"When is Israel going to be a true independent state?","AE Romm","Cape Town","03/09/08","After all, how did Baker want to \"F**** them\" (the Jews? the Israelis?), by not giving them \"charity\" (real charity is given to poor people and poor nations)? ");
AddReply(284758,"Regretfully, they\'re ALL bought slaves & just \"more (hot) sauce for US\'s goose\"!","Fedupwidit","USA","03/09/08","The recently regurgiated dynamite prize man, Al \"Global Lacky\" Gore (phleeeease, enuff misry already) also included!\n\n");
AddReply(284725,"Reply to # 17 & # 18 Comments","Yehoshua","Ormond Beach","03/09/08","ASSUMING THE BEST AND MAOZ, A RESPECTED JOURNALIST, OVERSTATED HIS CASE (AFTER ALL, HONIGMAN WANTS TO BELIEVE THE BEST ABOUT McCAIN...HE MENTIONS AT THE BEGINNING AND THE END HE\'S A McCAIN SUPPORTER--WE\'RE STILL LEFT WITH THE UNDISPUTED FACT THAT McCAIN\'S PROBABLE POINT MAN AND MENTOR FOR THE MIDEAST IS THE RABID ANTI-SEMITE AND ANTI-ZIONIST, JAMES BAKER.\n\nNO PROBLEM WITH THAT?");
AddReply(284605,"US Choice","Howard","Pennsylvania","03/09/08","I am a Republican. Sen. McCain has already stated that he will never pardon Yonatan Pollard and that he thinks Jew-hater James Baker is the smartest man in America - Scratch McCain. Obama is a muslim. I do not believe one word he says. Scratch Obama. That leaves Hillary. Maybe she will live up to her husband\'s commitment to Netanyahu to pardon Pollard. As an Israeli Nationalist, my vote goes to Hillary by default. If Obama runs against McCain I will probably move to Israel sooner than later. And, yes, I know, I should probably be there now.");
AddReply(284537,"Hillary- a friend to the PLO","Tim","Texas","03/08/08","Don\'t forget that Hillary and Arafat\'s wife were very good friends.  Hillary is not an ally to the Jews.  On the contrary, she is an enemy.  The story line we have been told is she was elected by the Jews in New York to keep her under their thumb which they have done quite successfully.  As president, she won\'t be under their thumb any more and will turn on the Jews as quickly as she can climb on her throne in the White House.  I\'m afraid that there is no candidate running for president that is pro-Israel, so I suggest you ignore the American State Department, throw out the American Embassy and go it alone.  You would be much better off.  You have G-d, America doesn\'t.  We are now cursed for turning on Israel.");
AddReply(284444,"DARKNESS ENVELOPS NATIONS","Truth 1","US","03/08/08","Evil has crept into every realm of life, slowly, hovering like a dark cloud above every nation; killing our children, poisoning souls. Perversion and corruption become accepted. In the name of \"Peace\" destruction multiplies like a virus. Murder becomes choice, Money becomes God, Right becomes Wrong. We spend our lives chasing the carrot corruption dangles in front of us, never seeing the darkness creeping in our door. \n\nGod\'s Word is Light, and Godly men and women must boldly shine that Light into this darkness NOW, or be overcome. Our world is run by PR, Islam uses it, and is believed by the ignorant masses. So, all nations--SPEAK UP, shine Light into darkness, DEMAND Godliness in leaders--or we perish. Bible believers have NO candidates in US elections, & must find another candidate and vote in force. Israel, take a stand NOW before it\'s too late for you too!");
AddReply(284411,"All the Candidates are Socialists","Louise M. Smith","Brandon,Florida","03/07/08","McCain, B. HUSSEIN Obama (1st cousin to Odinga, the Muslim presidential candidate who lost the recent election in Kenya & promptly launched riots that resulted in the deaths of 300 Kenyans)  & Shrillary Clinton are all socialists, bent on dragging us into a socialist, one-world tyranny in which they can be the elite, & the rest of us can be the peasants they walk on.\nI will be voting for an independent candidate this November.");
AddReply(284403,"McCain","Avraham","Texas","03/07/08","I am extremely disappointed that McCain is even remotely considering James Baker for any position in his possible gov\'t. Apparently McCain and his brother Joe McCain do not share the same views of Israel. I can only hope that John Mc would read the letter that his brother Joe wrote.  I think you can Google \"Joe McCain on the Jews and Israel\".  If  John McCain truly feels the way this article says he does, then I have a huge problem of voting for him next fall.  He has already shown that he is as much a Dem as he is a Rep. and that is almost enough to make me stay home.  But when one looks at what the Dems are going to offer up then our chances of getting anyone who supports Israel appear to be very dim.  Israel has got to admit that Jews and Israel are on their own and they had better start realizing that.");
AddReply(284360,"Torah Solution ","Donald","East Tennessee","03/07/08","This dilemma of who to vote for, can be resolved.  If all Yehudim living in the U.S. contact Nefesh B\'Nefesh and began the Aliyah process, then it will not matter who becomes the U.S. President, as we will all (or most of us) be living in Israel.  To rebut someone who claims that even if most of us returned to Ha Ertez, that it would still matter who was the U.S. president, I refer you to Torah.  We are to ONLY trust in HaShem!");
AddReply(284354,"ALL LIBERALS ARE FANATICS and mc cain is liberal.","BillH","LeecoFl","03/07/08","When liberal politicians deal with communists islamofascists fatah and even alquaida they talk about \'finding common ground \', \'seeking to understand them\', pragmatism  negotiation and other such sentiment. \n\nThe liberal is happy to live with these organisations because their  common enemy is the Torah believing Jew and Christian.\n\nThe treatment given to the Torah believer is the opposite, and includes immediate arrest for  demonstrating ,  eviction ( ie from Gaza and the settlements) , denial of first amendment rights and we will not forget Waco and other massacres.\n\nThe liberal is a fanatic in part becauss he seeks to achieve what the islamofascists want  only by legislation and viscious application of police powers, rather than the bomb.\n\nThe joint objective of the liberal and islamofascist and others is the silence or death of the Torah believer.\n\nIt is important to know the extreme nature of this fanatical liberal enemy . \n\nAll three presidential hopefuls like olmert and kadima are liberals which indicates tough days ahead for Israel and the U.S.\n\n");
AddReply(284323,"Strong Misimpression","J. Feigenbaum","Chicago","03/07/08","Honigman presents Mccain\'s alleged opinions by not citing their original source, a May 1st article in Haaretz by Amir Oren, an anti-settler leftist reporter, but rather citing a secondary source - a Jason Maoz article written in the pro-settler Jewish Press. McCain strongly repudiated Oren\'s distortion of what he said. McCain\'s repudiation appears in the Jewish Press: http://www.jewishpress.com/displayContent_new.cfm?mode=a§ionid=1&contentid=17926&contentName=%3Ci%3EJewish%20Press%20Exclusive%20-%20%3C/i%3E%20McCain:%20\'Proudly%20Pro-Israel\'%20%20-%20%3Ci%3ESays%20Haaretz%20Article%20Left%20\'Serious 20Misimpressions\'%20%3C/i%3E  \n\n");
AddReply(284302," A Distortion of What McCain Said?","J. Feigenbaum","Chicago","03/07/08","Posted: May 17, 2006 in and for the Jewish Press - the alleged source of information for Honigman\'s article: \n  \n\"In statements to The Jewish Press this week, Arizona Senator John McCain reacted sharply to an article earlier this month in the Israeli daily Haaretz that he said left \"several serious misimpressions\" regarding his views on Israel and the Middle East.\n \nAs reported in the Media Monitor column in last week’s Jewish Press, the May 1 Haaretz article portrayed McCain, the early front-runner for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination, as someone who, if elected president, would \"micromanage\" a more even-handed Mideast policy than that of President Bush; envisioned \"concessions and sacrifices by both sides\"; and expected Israel to eventually retreat, with some modifications, to pre-Six Day War borders. A source in McCain’s office characterized the Haaretz interview as a brief, impromptu session and the resulting article as long on a reporter’ssuppositions and short on concrete quotes from McCain.\n\n\"You’ll note,\" said the source, \"that the article featured perhaps one complete sentence from the senator; otherwise the report is basically the reporter’s narrative interspersed with several fragmentary quotes\" from McCain.\n\nThe senator himself was clearly miffed at his portrayal in Haaretz, saying that \"after reading the Haaretz article and subsequent report in The Jewish Press,\" he felt the need to \"clear up several serious misimpressions.\"\n\nMcCain said that \"in contrast to the impression left by the Haaretz article, I’ve never held the position that Israel should return to 1967 lines, and that is not my position today.\"\n\nThe senator further maintained that \"in the course of that brief, off-the-cuff conversation, I never discussed settlement blocs, a total withdrawal, or anything of the sort.\"Final settlement lines, McCain added, \"depend on the decisions of the Israeli government and its interlocutor on the Palestinian side.\" The problem, he continued, is that \"at the moment there simply is no Palestinian interlocutor, as it is impossible to negotiate with people calling for one’s destruction.\"\n\nAnd that, McCain said, is where he believes \"the confusion about the article comes in. The questioner asked a few hypothetical questions about some time in the indeterminate future – but that future will never arrive so long as Israel lacks a partner for peace. Talk of concessions on either side or of negotiators is premature so long as Hamas remains dedicated to the use of violence and the extinction of Israel.\"\n\nMcCain sounded a pessimistic note on the viability of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, at least in the short term. \"There can be no comprehensive peace accord between Israel and the Palestinians until the Palestinians recognize Israel, forswear forever the use of violence, recognize their previous agreements, and reform their internal institutions,\" he said.\n\n\"Unfortunately, with the election of Hamas, this process has taken a huge step backward, and it’s simply impossible to push today for a comprehensive accord.\"\n\nMcCain’s remarks reflect a long-standing commitment to Israeli security and a skepticism about the readiness of Palestinians to coexist with Israel. It is precisely his outspokenness in defense of Israel and strong pro-Israel voting record that had observers scratching their heads over the Haaretz article.\n\n\"That just didn’t sound like the John McCain everyone in Washington knows,\" said a political consultant who’s worked with both Democrats and Republicans and who requested anonymity because he doesn’t know who, if anyone, he might sign on with in 2008. \"If there’s anyone who doesn’t buy into the State Department, striped-pants view of the Middle East, it’s McCain.\"\n\nThe McCain that both supporters and opponents have come to know, said the consultant, is the McCain who in June 2001 told a special AIPAC seminar that \"America’s unequivocal support for Israel – not evenhandedness, not moral equivalence, not winking at Palestinian violence – is the best guarantor of peace in the Middle East.\"\n\nAIPAC spokesperson Jennifer Cannata told The Jewish Press that McCain \"has a strong record on behalf of the U.S.-Israel relationship. The senator consistently supports U.S. foreign aid to Israel and is a cosponsor of bills currently under consideration in the Senate that impose sanctions on Iran’s nuclear program and isolate the Hamas-led Palestinian Authority.\"\n\nMalcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, characterized McCain’s record on Israel-related issues as \"excellent.\"\n\n\"McCain has identified with many Jewish causes,\" said Hoenlein, who noted that the Presidents Conference will be hosting McCain in a few weeks. \"He’s definitely a staunch supporter of a strong U.S.-Israel relationship.\"\n\nMcCain was unequivocal in his remarks to The Jewish Press.\n\n\"I’m proudly pro-Israel, and my positions have been consistent and clear,\" he said. \"Israel, as one of America’s closest allies and the only democracy in a dangerous neighborhood, deserves our support and assistance. That’s why I view with such alarm the victory of Hamas and the Iranian president’s vile comments about wiping Israel off the map.\"\n\n");
AddReply(284287,"As Nixon said - it doesn\'t matter who is President","Phillip Slepian","New Jersey","03/07/08","It really doesn\'t matter who is President: U.S. foreign policy is largely determined by the State Dept., which never liked the idea of a Jewish state in the heart of Arabia. At the least, they will do nothing to help Israel, at the worst, they contribute to its destruction. This goes back to the Truman administration, when State would have preferred the U.S. vote against the Partition Plan. Even a pro-israel Sec. of State won\'t make a difference, since State policies are usually determined by lifetime State employees who hate Israel. Israel needs to learn that the U.S. is NOT her friend.");
AddReply(284281,"McCain.Hillary.Obama","Stan","New York","03/07/08","McCain has been a disappointment. On health insurance he wants to change nothing and just disallow people injured by incompetent HMOs or doctors from suing, as if those entities would pass the savings back to consumers (yeah,right). Hillary made phony rabbi Michale Lerner her Guru in the White House during Oslo, at least she has represented a Jewish district. Obama has too many ties to anti-semites.\nAt this point Hillary sounds like the less of three evils, but what a crappy field of play. God help Israel and the USA.");
AddReply(284266,"Michael #8","Meira","tampastan bay","03/07/08","Well I do think the conventions are redundant to the primaries. McCain got the popular vote by a lot but in the case of Hilary and Obama, the states that don\'t have primaries or caucuses, are there still any? can decide it.  so a convention is necessary. It\'s such a joke. Basically you go to the party and tell them you want to be a delegate and you have a good chance of being one. I did it in 1980 on the local level and didn\'t want to go further. Pretty enlightening actually. But this electoral business, really! Either make it the way it\'s done or eliminate it. Who chooses the electors? We don\'t vote for them?????");
AddReply(284256,"Jethro","Meira","tampastan bay","03/07/08","it\'s a matter of voting for the least evil or not voting and maybe Ha Shem will do the choosing whatever the outcome. Nothing happens by chance anyway but for those of us brought up in the indoctrination of the almighty vote, it\'s a very difficult place to be in. Only a madman would just jettison his beliefs with no thought fo the consequences. ");
AddReply(284194,"Excellent article, Mr Honigman.","Daniel Pinner","Kfar Tapuach","03/07/08","But it would be better directed at people like Tzippi Livni, Ehud Olmert, Ehud Barak, Aharon Barak, Shimon Peres, and others in Israel who are clamouring for the extirpitation of the Zionist enterprise throughout Judea and Samaria.");
AddReply(284184,"There is no dilemma and no shame","Jetro","Haifa","03/07/08","It doesn\'t matter for both Americans and Israelis who will be next president and it doesn\'t matter whether you will vote or not. If McCain is bad \'cause he wants to promote Baker again, then what about Clinton\'s advisors such as Albright and Berger? Or Barack\'s advisor Brzezinski? ");
AddReply(284164,"McCain....","Christine","Chicago","03/07/08","As a conservative, I am not happy with many of the views of John McCain.  However, he will get my vote as I do NOT want to see Barak HUSSAIN Obama in the White House.  God help us all if that happens!!");
AddReply(284114,"No matter who is in the White House...","Leo","Fort Wayne, Ind","03/07/08","Israel should do what is in the best interest of Israel.  Any any politician no matter what nation they happen to represent who advocates Israel shrink in size should be openly opposed... especially by their own countrymen.  If Baker wants to pander to the Arab nations, let him do that as a private citizen.");
AddReply(283970,"Meira","Michael","Pt Charlotte,","03/07/08","I agree 100%...let the popular vote determine the next occupant of the White House. This nonsense of super delegates and conventions is just a huge waste of time and money");
AddReply(283969,"I voted for Her -I was going to Vote McCain","Bonnie","Texas","03/07/08","I voted for Hillary even though I do not like her. I cannot vote for Obama knowing who his friends are. I could see him appointing Farrakan as an ambassador or his pastor who are antisemites. I could see a possibility that he would help Odinga in Kenya who wants to bring Sharia law to Kenya. I now cannot vote for McCain in November because of Baker. Please no more Baker. He did enough harm. I will either stay home or vote for her again......yuk what a decision...");
AddReply(283935,"## 3-4","meira","tampastan bay","03/07/08","this is the dilemma. If we don\'t vote, are we throwing the election to McCain? FL might have a redo of the Dem. primary because the DNC has denied FL delegates credentials. ONe has to wonder about their motives but if we are seriously worried about who\'s worse McCain or BO, I think we have to think about Hilary again. Oy! I don\'t believe I just wrote that. My husband and I are deciding now wheter to go and vote for her if the redo happens. After learning the things here about McC. we just can\'t vote for him. I am radical enough to wonder if it really isn\'t anti-Torah to participate in a \"republic\" which is really what this is, not a democracy. Who are these \"delegates\" and \"electors\" we don\'t choose who make our leadership choices for us? Do they really share our values and goals? Why have a convention if there\'s no question as to the candidate? Why a general election if only the electoral votes count?  ");
AddReply(283933,"Blame our liberal mainscream media for imposing these liberal candidates on us!","MED ","USA","03/07/08","All three of these presidential candidates were  promoted by the US liberal media.  They get their news templates from the New York Times.  And we all know who runs the NYTimes.\n\nIf the media has boosted these candidates, they also know how to kick them out of their elevated pedestals.\n\nWe just don\'t know, who in the end will end up sitting in the Oval Office.  If we elect the one who supports Israel, the US will be blessed. If not, we will be cursed.  That\'s what the Good Book says.\n\nThe MSM ruined the political careers of staunch supporters of Israel, like Senators Santorum, George Allen and many others.  \n\nWe just don\'t trust any of these politicians. They will say whatever pleases that particular group whose votes they want.");
AddReply(283914,"Mr McCain","Michael","Port Charlotte,","03/07/08","Thank you for sharing this. I am a Republican who supports Israel and will not be voting in the national election this fall.");
AddReply(283912,"Rename Jordan to Palestine!!!","Gary","Monterey, CA","03/07/08","Mr. Honigman:\n\nRename Jordan to Palestine and remove out of Israel all Palestinians to their new home.  \nAs far as a new Secretary of State under McCain, have the Jews form a consensus on their choice, and have McCain agree before the election.\n\n\n");
AddReply(283879,"Here we go again!","Rifkah","Los Angeles, CA","03/07/08","Regarding the exact quote by James Baker that he allegedly said “F**** the Jews. They don’t vote for us anyway,” the wording is still up in the air, but the sentiment is accurate, as per William Safire in the New York Times.  Baker’s association with the Bushs was so close that President George H.W. Bush (in 1990) asked the American attorney general for a secret waiver from the statute prohibiting the federal conflict -of-interest law Baker was violating.  His personal investments in oil interests were in direct contradiction of his status as a neutral umpire in the 1992 peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.  If McCain wants to reinstate Baker as a player in the peace process, this tells us where McCain stands.  I support Israel all the way, and I can’t support McCain. I suggest that he campaign for the Muslim vote.  I’m staying home on Election Day.");
AddReply(283831,"don\'t know who","meira","tampastan bay","03/07/08","to vote for. what a situation. didn\'t know about Mccain\'s close ties to baker I don\'t like Hilary but I was glad to see her rally against barak, I think. I was  pretty sure he had it sewn up. thoughts anyone?Maybe just move to Israel and not worry what this place does to itself? no, not until our \"leaders\" stop bowing down to the \"american idol\"  ");

WriteReplies(1,7816,iDiv);