sRepliesHTML = "";iReplies = 10;mReplies = iReplies;iDiv = 5450
AddReply(102006,"The Grave Has Been Dug!","Jk","USA","08/20/05","Once again Jews have dug their own graves under the \"whip\" and \"lash\" of their overlords (Bush and CondaLezza \"Reich\", Sharon and his leftist bed pals, the EuroNazis, quartet,UN). Now all that these compliant Jews of Israel need to do is take their place in the grave and patiently, but anxiously await the executing shots (by gun, bomb, etc.) from their \"peace\" partners, the emboldened IslamoNazis. \n\nThis alone should bring into question the anti-semitic remarks about Jews being so smart and so in control of the world. Perhaps we see ourselves that way, but so do most fools. \n\n\n\n");
AddReply(102005,"Truth is truth","Cheryl","USA","08/19/05","Amazing how politicians can espouse peace and security, when evidence and blatant public comments from Palestinian leaders and news accounts proves otherwise. Pragmatically, disengagement will prove to be a horrible mistake that intensified  terrorism.  If you combine pragmatism with an analysis of prophetic Scriptures about the regathering of Jews out of all the nations back to Israel, it\'s rather stunning for today.  Truth is truth.  Pragmatism and Scripture are meeting in Truth.  Jeremiah 6:6 - \"Peace, peace, they say, when there is no peace.\"  Shalom.");
AddReply(102004,"Don\'t be naiive","Josh","Israel","08/19/05","I wouldn\'t be so naiive as to think the supporters of this plan meant well.  Disengagement has not only destroyed the lives of many innocent people, but has also endangered Israel\'s existence.  The ones who thought of this know full well what they are doing, and are laughing all the way to the bank (literally).  Sharon\'s greatest sin wasn\'t refusing a national referendum- the public has no right to vote on humanitarian issues!  If he would have one such a referendum, it wouldn\'t have made disengagement immoral.  His greatest sin was selling out the country for money.");
AddReply(102003,"Sharon the Jackel","Mark David","occupied Chicago, Illinoi","08/19/05","Sharon kicks Jews out of Gaza. Now my home in Chicago & in Florida is at risk. Now Jews all over the world have to wonder, will I be kicked out of my home next? All Jews are now less safe, b/c Sharon wishes to stay in power and out of jail at any cost.\nThanks Arik, your a lion turned into a jackel, who eats their own children.");
AddReply(102002,"Real change is needed","j","b","08/19/05","Your last paragraph is right on, but missing an important element. We saw that 250,000 Jews stood up by the Kotel. This can be a tremendous way of effecting change. If each person went out to convince 10 people to vote for a new party we can change everything. However, many Jews are not religious. They will not vote for a religious right wing party. They do not want a theocracy. The only parties that are not left or religious are Likud and Shinu. Both being a disaster. We need a new right wing party with a platform that does not espouse religion. We need a M. Begin approach, now more then ever");
AddReply(102001,"Unity of the nationalist-religious and the national-non-religious need","David Lourie","Boston, MA USA","08/19/05","David, I am very impressed by your clear and rational thoughts. As a non religious Jew I feel exactly as you do. Unity of the nationalist camp, including the nationalist-religious and the nationalist-non-religious, will be the key to voting out Sharon and his misguided cohorts. We will need a new committed and honest nationalist government to deal effectively with coming third intifada.");
AddReply(102000,"Not to mention","Phil S","California","08/19/05","the issue of unity, there is a widespread impression among the religious Zionist camp that this was done intentionally to kick the religious nationalists in the teeth.  All the Haaretz incitement, the talk of breaking bones and the talk of a 2nd Altalena is hardly the kind of stuff meant to encourage unity, quite the opposite.");
AddReply(101999,"I still have a major problem","Phil s","California","08/19/05","with the concept of forcibly moving people of any stripe who are willing to live in peace with their neighbors.  \nIf you start throwing around the concept of Jews living in a sea of Arabs you are talking about the whole of Israel which comprises less than 1% of the population and land of the Mid East.\nFinally there is the absurbity of giving up something in return for nothing. There is no doubt that Israel is leaving under pressure so we either have a case of appeasement (don\'t we owe Neville Chamberain an apology) or a case of retreat under fire.  Hard to see anything good in it.");
AddReply(101998,"David Writes About  Something To Hope For","Adina Kutnicki","Ridgewood, NJ","08/19/05","One of the many things that makes David Hornick such a great writer, and a valuable contributor to the national dialogue, is his clarity of thought.\n\nHe makes it possible to still believe that the secular and religious have alot more in common than their differences that divide them.");
AddReply(101997,"Dump the pro-Palestinian Peres.","MED","USA","08/19/05","Sharon was stern with regard to his support for Gaza and W.Bank settlements.  But in 2003 when he formed the coalition government with Peres and his labor group, Sharon\'s stand shifted in Dec.2003. Peres was the one who negotiated with Arafat in Paris during early 1990s and tried to transform a terrorist into a statesman.  It was Peres who objected Sharon\'s stand to get rid of Arafat after the intifada of 2000.  Even to this day the PA considers Peres as their mediator between them and Sharon.  It\'s a pity that Sharon has fallen for this ploy by Peres.");

WriteReplies(1,5450,iDiv);