sRepliesHTML = "";iReplies = 15;mReplies = iReplies;iDiv = 4036
AddReply(151499,"Preemption will take place but not from Israel","Sal Azam","Chicago,IL","08/14/04","Seeing is believing. Preemption will take place unfortunately upon Israel by United States and the Europeans. At the moments just the sanctions are coming.");
AddReply(151498,"Profound article,besides one wrong assumption","mark","","08/11/04","US can\'t count on the Iranian opposition ,as stipulated in the article .\nNot only because ,as in case of Afghanistan and Iraq,US is bogged down by ceasfires and \"negotiations\" which allow Bin Ladin to escape and Al-Sadr to laugh.\nIt is because even Iranian emigrants in the West are immensly proud of the Teherans atom bomb .\nUS must go it alone .");
AddReply(151497,"Our Resources...","R. Delaney","Fort Worth U.S.","08/11/04","Rachel Neuwirth, thank you for your unbiased, detailed assessment of the world scenario from Israel\'s persective.  People, especially Zionists, must be made aware of the urgency and seriousness of these matters at hand.  As you know, President Bush has great intentions; however, he is forced to play the political game in numerous different political and economic segments.  You probably agree that Jewish and Christian Zionists are, and will be, the greatest asset to the support of Israel as world support diminishes further.  Be blessed.\nBaruch HaShem!");
AddReply(151496,"who do you support","charles mcmasters","ridgeland","08/11/04","The jews have always supported the democratic canidate.  A \"weak on defense\" Kerry will be bad for the US and Israel.  Mr Bush holds the best solution for all concerned.  If you want to help Israel , support Mr. Bush..he has the guts to make the hard decisions unlike Mr. Kerry and his friends Jane Fonda and other traitors to freedom.");
AddReply(151495,"So Whats the problem?","","","08/11/04","Take out syria first, then go take care of Iran.");
AddReply(151494,"Israel needs new friends","Tomoyuki Yamashita","Akihabara","08/11/04","Israel must explore the possibility of increased alliance with nationas such as Japan.\nJapan is a militarily dormant nation with trade links to Iran, and thus may wield some considerable political sway.\nJapan will also be seen to be a more even handed mediator between Israel and Islamic nations.\nA Israeli-Japanese alliance will be mutually beneficial, provided Israel open her markets to Japan.");
AddReply(151493,"Comments:\"Preemptive attack on Iran\"","Keith David","Mumbai,India","08/11/04","Ms.Neuwirt should also have mentioned \"Pakistan\",Pakistan currrently has an Active NuclearWeapons Programme,remember in 1998 the Pakistanis boasted that they had the \"Islamic Bomb\",Israel should also Destroy Pakistan\'s Nukes also along    with Iran,the people of India would be very pleased if Israel also took out Pakistan\'s Active Nukes.");
AddReply(151492,"Brilliant Analysis","Mark","Jhb","08/11/04","Each article surpasses the next.\n\nBut will Israel shake of its servile client nation relationship with the US and act in its own best interests.\n\nAssuredly America will not act as a honest broker with Israel. Again politics and oil.\nEspecially OIL dictate all and everything. A few million Jewish lives are worth naught to these perfidous and traitorous nations.\n\nIsrael\'s last and only hope is God. My suggestion is to go to God with a sincere request for guidance and assistance. You never know - God might just intercede - He is waiting at the door, waiting for acknowledgenment.Israel do not leave your God out or calamity will surely result.");
AddReply(151491,"To Matt:","Phillip Slepian","Elizabeth, NJ, USA","08/11/04","I have made similar comments before, but you are ignoring a central part of nuclear weapons capabilities:  The nature of the countries that possess nuclear weapons.  France has long had nuclear weapons.  France is not a threat to world peace, since it has a stable government that well understands the implications of using nuclear weapons, and understands the need to keep them properly secured.  A better example is the former Soviet Union.  While the Cold War lasted for decades, it was never questioned that Moscow also understood how serious a thing it would be to actually use nuclear weapons.  Only when the Soviet Union was dismantled, and the nuclear weapons were distributed among the smaller, less stable governments that were formed in the aftermath was there grave concern.  The concern was that these new countries, while perhaps understanding the implications of using these weapons and the need to safegaurd them, might not be able to properly safegaurd them.  The reason the world is concerned with North Korea and Iran is that their governments are not stable, their leaders are not always interested in peace and stability, and they may actively engage in distributing nuclear weapons to terrorist organizations or other countries for profit or to benefit Jihad.  Nuclear weapons capality in and of itself is not the problem, but rather the nature of the government that controls them.  Hence, Israel having nuclear weapons is not a threat to peace.  In fact, the deterent provided by Israeli nuclear weapons may sustain peace.  Iran having nuclear weapons is completely different; it neutralizes Israel\'s deterent and destabilizes the region, since Iran is much more likely to use, threaten to use, or distribute these weapons.  Oh, by the way, 100% of the military aid Israel receives from the U.S. is spent on military goods produced by American companies, supporting the U.S. economy.  It\'s actually a U.S. government subsidy of the U.S. arms industry.");
AddReply(151490,"The die has been cast","Marcel","Florida","08/11/04","Another excellent article !  \nIt\'s evident where this road map leads.\nThe U.S. did nothing after Pakistan\'s nuke peddler passed pandora\'s box around.\nThe U.S has rearmed Egypt, Jordan,Saudi and countless other Islamic front line nations opposed to Jewish presence on land that was once under Harb al Islam.\nThis idol ,this golden calf that Israeli politician bow to and worship and run to for everything has proven to be unreliable and dark ,yet Israel\'s Sharon continues to obey all orders from his golden calf in Washington.\nThe west will do nothing with Iran,the die is cast that Israel wil be blamed for the major nuclear war that approaches on the horizon.\nThe west including Bush have already chosen to side with the forces arrayed against Israel,the rest is smoke and mirrors.\nArafat knows he is safe,and Sharon continues to project weakness, inviting Pandora\'s entrance.        ");
AddReply(151489,"Israel survival does not depend on the west","Etienne","Cherlotte","08/11/04"," Once again , we have to understand that the west is only concerned about Oil and not the security of non - western people( Jews and Blacks). We can therefore understand why 3.5 millions people have to die in the DR Congo, when only two palestinians terrorists were stopped from hurting the Jewish civilians, and thus the news get the front page of every media in the West, because the act was done by the Jews against the Arab. The world is led by the spirit of selfishness which motivates the relationship the West has with other nations. Ignorants still beleive the survival of Israel depends on the U.S.. It is the image created by the U.S., but in depth of the matter we realize that America and the West scapegoat Israel for their imperialistic goals as they have used Black Africans to serve the welfare of their own population. How come the slaying of 3.5 millions niggers in the jungle forest of Congo has not received a front line in the media, but the security fence that saves millions of lives comes to be a subject of harsh criticism? because the dying people in Africa are niggers and it does not matter whether U.S., Canadian, Australian, French, Belgian,Russian, German, Egyptian companies make huge profit on the back of these primitive.Even when the U.N. knows who the perpetrators of these murderous act are, the answer is almost none. On the other hand , the people who build the security fence to save themselves are Jews. Oil is what matters, so let the Arab finish what the Aryans had started. ONCE MORE , ISRAEL SURVIVAL DOES NOT DEPEND ON THE AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN IMPERIALIST.          ");
AddReply(151488,"Different Ways Of Speaking","BobW","Virginia, USA","08/11/04","B\"H\nEven without a nuclear exchange, Israel will not be a majority Jewish populated nationin about 2 decades. The Bush administration has a more sophisticated response than a press release.  The fleet of F16I aircraft currently transferring to Israel has something to do with a mutual defense pact. I believe the US manufactured aircraft represents a US response. Kol tuv, BobW");
AddReply(151487,"Illogical","Matt","NYC","08/11/04","This perspective is one of the most illogical i have read in Arutz Sheva.  America gives Israel more military aid than all other aid to other countries, COMBINED (my tax dollars).  The US has been very aggresive in making sure Iran does not produce nuclear weapons, while pandering to Israel\'s wish to remain \"ambigious\" about its nukes.  \nThe US congress constantly reaffirms its support for Israel (no doubt due to AIPAC\'s militant threats).  \nAmerica provides all this support while the citizens of every other country on earth scratch their heads.  To claim that the US is complacent with Arab aggression is absolutely ludicrous.  ");
AddReply(151486,"inteligent analysis","zvi gross","ottawa","08/11/04","Finally I read an intelligent analysis on this sorry situation-for a change.\nDo relevant policy makers listen?");
AddReply(151485,"Not a Pleasant Scenario","Frank","Raleigh","08/11/04","In an environment where the media and Democrats cry foul over a terror alert, I too believe the Bush administration won\'t do anything prior to the November election. However, in the post election period, re-elected or not, I expect Bush will either order U.S. strikes against Iranian targets or allow/cooperate with the Israelis in a strike.Kerry on the other hand is a different story. He\'s already on record saying he\'ll give the nuclear fuel to Iran.\"Fine, we will provide you the fuel that you need if Russia fails to provide it.\" \n\nhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5570503/site/newsweek/ \n\nWe should call their bluff, and organize a group of states that will offer the nuclear fuel they need for peaceful purposes and take back the spent fuel so they can?t divert it to build a weapon. \n\nhttp://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/speeches/spc_2004_0601.html \n\nJohn Kerry\'s proposal would call their bluff by organizing a group of states to offer Iran the nuclear fuel they need for peaceful purposes and take back the spent fuel so they cannot divert it to build a weapon. If Iran does not accept this offer, their true motivations will be clear. \n\nhttp://www.johnkerry.com/issues/national_security/strategy.html ");

WriteReplies(1,4036,iDiv);