He Ru Follow us: Make a7 your Homepage
      Fundamentally Freund
      by Michael Freund
      An alternative approach to Israeli political commentary.
      Email Me
      Subscribe to this blog’s RSS feed
      Michael Freund is Founder and Chairman of Shavei Israel (www.shavei.org), which reaches out and assists "lost Jews" seeking to return to the Jewish people. He writes a syndicated column and feature stories for the Jerusalem Post. Previously, he served as Deputy Director of Communications & Policy Planning in the Israeli Prime Minister´s Office under former premier Benjamin Netanyahu. A native of New York, he holds an MBA in Finance from Columbia University and a BA from the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University. He has lived in Israel for the past decade.
      Adar Bet 9, 5765, 3/20/2005

      Democracy and its Headaches


      Israeli democracy suffered yet another blow over the weekend, when the army issued decrees barring Jews from moving to the Gaza Strip and Samaria communities slated for expulsion this summer.

      This heavy-handed move undermines some of the country’s most basic civil liberties, such as freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, and the right to protest against government policy.

      The IDF is also reportedly planning to declare these areas to be “closed military zones”, thereby making it illegal for any non-residents to be there – a move aimed clearly at limiting the size, and extent, of on-site protests.

      On the surface, this might seem eminently logical – after all, if the government plans on removing the Jewish residents, then why make the task more difficult by allowing others to join them in advance of any withdrawal?

      Tylenol But that argument simply doesn’t hold water for one very simple reason: a government’s job is not to make its own life easier, but to safeguard the freedoms of its citizens. And that includes the freedom to give the government a policy-oriented headache.

      Issuing such over-arching decrees only serves to reinforce the government’s image as plowing ahead with little or no regard for the niceties (and basic requirements) of democracy.

      And in the end, regardless of where one stands on the proposed withdrawal, that is something that no one can, nor should, countenance.