He Ru Follow us: Make a7 your Homepage
      Free Daily Israel Report
      YouReport, Send us News & updates

      Arutz 7 Most Read Stories

      Fundamentally Freund
      by Michael Freund
      An alternative approach to Israeli political commentary.
      Email Me
      Subscribe to this blog’s RSS feed
      Michael Freund is Founder and Chairman of Shavei Israel (www.shavei.org), which reaches out and assists "lost Jews" seeking to return to the Jewish people. He writes a syndicated column and feature stories for the Jerusalem Post. Previously, he served as Deputy Director of Communications & Policy Planning in the Israeli Prime Minister´s Office under former premier Benjamin Netanyahu. A native of New York, he holds an MBA in Finance from Columbia University and a BA from the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University. He has lived in Israel for the past decade.

      Shevat 12, 5769, 2/6/2009

      Obama and the Wages of Weakness



      While Obama is expending valuable time trying to entice Iran into a diplomatic dance, the Ayatollahs are plowing ahead with plans to build nuclear weapons
      Barack Obama has only been president for a little more than two weeks, yet America's enemies can already sense a strong gust of weakness blowing out of Washington.

      In a series of unprecedented gestures, beginning with his inauguration speech and culminating in an interview to an Arab television station last week, Obama has virtually pleaded with the likes of Iran and Syria to make nice, cuddle up and, aw shucks, why don’t we all just be friends.

      "I do think that it is important for us to be willing to talk to Iran, to express very clearly where our differences are but where there are potential avenues for progress," the president told Al-Arabiya.

      "If countries like Iran are willing to unclench their fist, they will find an extended hand from us," he pledged.

      Needless to say, Obama's unwarranted magnanimity was met with a highly predictable response.

      Simply put, Tehran declared victory.

      On Saturday, the official Iranian government spokesman, Gholam Hussein Elham, singled out Obama's offer to talk as proof that America's policy towards his country had "failed".

      "This request means Western ideology has become passive, that capitalist thought and the system of domination have failed," he said (AFP, January 31).

      Is this really the message the West needs to be sending?

      Not surprisingly, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad quickly seized upon Washington's newfound lust for conciliation by laying out a new series of preposterous demands to the US President.

      In an address broadcast last week on Iranian state television, he essentially demanded that Obama grovel and beg forgiveness.

      "Those who speak of change must apologize to the Iranian people and try to repair their past bad acts and the crimes they committed against Iran," Ahmadinejad said, conveniently ignoring his own country's decades-long record of taking Western hostages and financing anti-American and anti-Israel terror.

      In the same speech, Iran's thug-in-chief went on to insist that the US must put an end to its military presence around the world, and "stop supporting the Zionists, outlaws and criminals."

      Sure sounds like peace is at hand, doesn't it?

      But just in case the message did not get through clearly enough, the Iranians went ahead and took a series of steps in recent days to further underline just how much their fist remains, as it were, anything but "unclenched".

      The Ayatollahs went out of their way to fete Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal and Palestinian arch-terrorist Samir Kuntar in Tehran, treating the two murderers of Jews as if they were national heroes.

      And just yesterday, the Iranians demonstrated their increasingly effective ballistic missile technology by successfully launching their first locally-produced satellite into space (Ynet, February 3).

      Needless to say, that technology would come in quite handy should Iran ever decide to fire intercontinental missiles at the very same "Zionists, outlaws and criminals" whom it regularly threatens to annihilate.

      And then, of course, there is Tehran's ongoing nuclear program, which by all accounts is proceeding apace.

      While Obama is expending valuable time trying to entice Iran into a diplomatic dance, the Ayatollahs are plowing ahead with plans to build nuclear weapons.

      A report issued last week by the prestigious International Institute of Strategic Studies in London revealed that Iran will soon have enough low-enriched uranium to assemble an atomic bomb by next year (Daily Telegraph, January 28).

      That means the clock is ticking, loudly and clearly, and the countdown to a nuclear Iran has begun.

      Only instead of acting forcefully to stop it, Washington is trying to talk Iran into changing course. But this is a policy that has no chance of success.

      After all, since the summer of 2006, the UN Security Council has passed at least three resolutions demanding that Iran halt its uranium enrichment program.

      And despite the imposition of increasingly tighter sanctions, nothing has yet deterred the Iranians from pursuing their goal of a nuclear arsenal.

      There is no reason now to think that a few soothing words from Washington will do the trick. Anything less than military force will not prevent Iran from joining the nuclear club.

      Obama surely means well, and hopes to diffuse an increasingly dangerous situation through dialogue.

      But dealing with radical jihadists and state sponsors of terror is not the same as negotiating a compromise on a budget bill in the US Senate.

      Iran and its cohorts neither appreciate nor respect such measures, which only encourage them to harden their stances still further, confident in the knowledge that the US is desperate for some kind of deal.

      Indeed, there is a price-tag for this policy, as radicals around the world will take solace in knowing that they have nothing to fear from an administration that can not, or will not, prevent Tehran from getting the bomb.

      Rest assured, other foes of America will be quick to try and score points, in an effort to squeeze their own sets of concessions out of the new administration in Washington.

      These are the wages of Obama's weakness, and if you listen carefully, you can almost hear the clink of champagne glasses and the sounds of muffled laughter in places such as Tehran and Damascus, as America's foes prepare to cash in.

      In a recent interview with the BBC's Persian service, former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton sensibly suggested that Obama give Iran three months to negotiate an end to its nuclear program or face attack, in order to compel Tehran to end the crisis.

      But Bolton also conceded that there is virtually no chance that such a policy will be adopted, saying that he believed the US had “lost the contest” with Iran.

      “America," he concluded, "will not use military force against Iran and we are headed towards an Iran with nuclear weapons."

      G-d help us all if he proves to be right.



      Shevat 8, 5769, 2/2/2009

      Ehud Barak's Tunnel Vision



      One can only shake one's head in exasperation at Barak's tunnel vision.
      Hamas terrorists continue to smuggle weapons into Gaza via underground tunnels from Egypt, but that hasn't stopped Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak from offering to build the Palestinians yet another tunnel of their own.

      Speaking today at Ben-Gurion University in the Negev, Barak proposed that a 48-kilometer long tunnel be constructed between Gaza and Judea and Samaria in order to give the Palestinians "freedom of movement" between the two areas. Barak added that while the tunnel would be under Israeli sovereignty, it would in practice be under Palestinian control.

      One can only shake one's head in exasperation at Barak's tunnel vision.

      Does he not understand the danger that such a tunnel would pose to Israel and its existence?

      Think about it: Hamas would have an easy and straightforward way to smuggle just about anything it wants from Egypt into Gaza, and then from Gaza straight into Judea and Samaria.

      Within a short period of time, Israel could potentially find itself facing the threat not only of rocket fire emanating from Gaza, but also from Judea and Samaria as well. Tel Aviv would quickly become the next Sderot, thanks in no small measure to the obtuseness of Israel's own Defense Minister.

      The sooner this government leaves the scene, the safer Israel will be.

       



      Shevat 4, 5769, 1/29/2009

      So much for deterrence....



      Time and again, you will recall, our leadership told us that the recent counter-terror operation against Hamas would restore Israel's deterrence... this has proven to be sheer fantasy
      Barely a week has passed since the last Israeli solider left Gaza, and Hamas has already resumed its efforts to terrify the residents of Israel's south.

      This morning, Palestinians in Gaza fired a Qassam rocket which landed near Sderot. It was the second such attack in two days, after they launched a projectile yesterday at the western Negev. And on Tuesday, terrorists set off a bomb which killed an Israeli soldier and left three others injured.

      Time and again, you will recall, our leadership told us that the recent counter-terror operation against Hamas would restore Israel's deterrence by sending a message to the jihadists that the Jewish state would not tolerate attacks on its citizens.

      But now it should be clear that this has proven to be sheer fantasy.

      For if the terrorists had truly been deterred, would they dare to be launching increasingly brazen attacks? If Hamas had "learned a lesson", would they not have turned their efforts to rebuilding the Strip rather than their arsenal?

      Out of weakness, Israel's leaders left the job in Gaza undone when they pulled out a week ago. It is a mistake that will almost certainly come back to haunt us.

      So let's just hope and pray that the residents of the Negev will not have to pay a heavy price as a result.



      Tevet 27, 5769, 1/23/2009

      Time for a Gaza Apology



      no one wanted to listen, no one wished to hear, even as politicians and protesters on the Right railed against the disengagement, accurately predicting the disaster that would ensue
      For all the coverage of events in southern Israel of late, both the media and Israel's leadership have meticulously avoided any mention of the August 2005 Gaza pullout, despite the fact that it gave rise to the current mess in which we find ourselves.
      This is hardly surprising, because it would require them to admit they were wrong in backing that ill-fated move.
      But as I argue in the column below, it is time for a Gaza apology and a national admission of guilt. All those who had a hand in the disengagement should apologize to the people of Israel, the residents of Sderot and the rest of the Negev and especially to those who lived in Gush Katif.
      Because through their folly, the supporters of withdrawal brought disaster upon this country.

      Time for a Gaza Apology

      By Michael Freund

      For all its extensive, wall-to-wall coverage of the situation in the South over the past month, there is one key issue that the country's leadership and media have studiously and carefully avoided mentioning of late.

      Despite finding time to examine a wide range of subjects, from the intricacies of intra-Hamas politics to the technical differences between Kassam and Grad rockets, pundits and politicians alike have proven incapable of acknowledging the underlying cause behind the present disarray.

      Indeed, if you listened carefully, and followed the news in recent weeks, you may have noticed that hardly anything was said about the colossal strategic blunder which enabled Hamas to strike terror in the streets of Ashkelon and Beersheba.

      Yes, you guessed correctly. To paraphrase Bill Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign, "It was the disengagement, stupid!"

      Of course, this hardly comes as a surprise. After all, it would require something of our politicians and their guard dogs in the press which they seem constitutionally incapable of doing: admitting they were wrong.

      Yet that is precisely what they were when they supported the Sharon government's misguided August 2005 retreat: dead wrong, and profoundly so.

      It was their blunder, their bluster and their blindness, which got us into this mess, and which brought the country an unprecedented wave of airborne Palestinian projectiles and terror. All those who backed the pullout then, and adamantly defended it to the public, clearly now owe the rest of us a whopper of an apology.

      Which is exactly why they are so manifestly silent on the subject.

      BUT THE facts are too compelling to ignore, and they readily speak for themselves. Let's do a quick rewind and you'll see why.

      Prior to the ignominious retreat more than three years ago, there were warnings aplenty that it would endanger the South and place hundreds of thousands of people within range of jihadist rockets in Gaza.

      Here is just one of many examples. On January 11, 2005, seven months before the pullout, Col. Uzi Buchbinder, head of civil defense in the IDF's Home Front Command, told the Knesset Interior Committee that the disengagement plan, if implemented, would expose 46 towns and cities in the Negev to Kassam rocket fire.

      At the same hearing, Col. (res.) Mordechai Yogev presented a report to our parliamentarians, cautioning that "the withdrawal of the IDF from the Gaza Strip and northern Samaria will bring numerous large population centers and communities within the range of Kassam rockets and mortar shells." (Ha'aretz, January 12, 2005)

      And that, of course, is precisely what occurred.

      But no one wanted to listen, no one wished to hear, even as politicians and protesters on the Right railed against the disengagement, accurately predicting the disaster that would ensue.

      Instead, the leaders of the country mocked the plan's opponents and hurled invective and abuse their way.

      After more than 100,000 people rallied outside the Knesset on January 29, 2005 against the government's plan, vice prime minister Shimon Peres ridiculed the gathering, labeling it a "rally of shlemazels." (Jerusalem Post, February 1, 2005)

      As it turns out, of course, the real shlemazels are not those who warned about the dangers of retreat, but those who stubbornly ignored them.

      IN THIS context it is worth recalling that one of those who led the charge in favor of the expulsion of Gaza's Jews was none other than our very own Ehud Olmert, who at the time served as Ariel Sharon's vice premier.

      On June 9, 2005, Olmert insisted in remarks to an American Jewish audience that the disengagement "will bring more security, greater safety, much more prosperity and a lot of joy for all the people that live in the Middle East." Continuing with his flight of fantasy, Olmert went on to say that "we are confident that this disengagement will be successful, and that it will then lead to the beginning of a new pattern of relations between us and the Palestinian Authority."

      Well, it certainly has lead to a "new pattern of relations," as the Palestinian leadership was forced to flee to Ramallah after Hamas quickly seized control over Gaza. But that, of course, is not quite what Olmert and his colleagues had in mind.

      On August 15, 2005, the day of the pullout itself, Sharon addressed the nation and assured us that "this plan is good for Israel in any future scenario." Needless to say, that has proven to be patently untrue. And while Sharon is no longer in any condition to be offering regrets, there are plenty of people out there in positions of power who darn well should.

      It is time for a Gaza apology and a national admission of guilt. All those who had a hand in the disengagement should apologize to the people of Israel, the residents of Sderot and the rest of the Negev and especially to those who lived in Gush Katif.

      Through their folly, the supporters of withdrawal brought disaster upon this country. They destroyed the lives of thousands of Gaza's Jews, and put nearly a million Israelis within the cross-hairs of Hamas.

      Unless Israel and its leaders have the courage to come to terms with their error, the danger of making additional such blunders will continue to accompany us well into the future.

      Mistakes, wrote the author James Joyce, are portals of discovery. They allow us to gain a better glimpse of reality and to move forward. But that can only happen if in fact one is capable of embracing his own failings.

      The disengagement, as its name implied, was supposed to disengage Israel from the Palestinians and their violence. But instead, as we have seen, it did just the opposite.

      It is about time that its proponents publicly acknowledged as much.

      --- from the January 21 Jerusalem Post



      Tevet 23, 5769, 1/19/2009

      Leaving Hamas in Place



      After knocking the Hamas jihadists to the ground, Israel is now letting them get back up, dust themselves off, and prepare to attack us once again, at a time of their choosing.
      With breathtaking speed, Israel is about to undo the limited military achievements of the past three weeks of fighting against Hamas.

      Senior Israeli officials told the Jerusalem Post today that the IDF will be out of Gaza in time for Barack Obama's inauguration tomorrow as President of the United States - in what appears to be a clear-cut attempt to appease the incoming administration even before it officially gets off the ground.

      What a cataclysmic error! What a colossal mistake!

      By declaring a unilateral cease-fire and leaving Hamas in place, Israel is granting the terrorist movement an opportunity to recoup its losses, rebuild its infrastructure and rearm itself. After knocking the Hamas jihadists to the ground, Israel is now letting them get back up, dust themselves off, and prepare to attack us once again, at a time of their choosing.

      What a disgrace!

      Israel had them with their backs against the wall, and could have delivered a decisive blow. But instead, thanks to the weakness of our leaders, Hamas will now have a chance to live to see another day.

      It may take a week, a month or a year, but you can rest assured that at some point soon, when Hamas feels ready, they will resume launching rockets at Israel's south. And when they do, our leadership will have no one to blame but themselves.