News Briefs





Blog


Nisan 6, 5767, 3/25/2007

Trotskyite Trash in Israel

by Steven Plaut

Alon Dahan is one of the best columnists in Israel.  He often writes on the NFC.CO.IL web site.

Today he has a must-read article there, available only in Hebrew, entitled "The Trotskyist Revolution is On".  He begins by noting that most people in Israel, at least outside of certain pseudo-academic post-Zionist circles, understand that Stalin was an evil genocidal dictator.  But for some reason, Leon Trotsky has always been regarded with a bit of forgiving admiration by the members of Israel's intelligentsia and Moonbatocracy.  

Dahan's article is as sharp as the ice pick of a Stalinist agent.  He argues that if anything Trotsky was more radical and pro-violence than Uncle Joe Stalin, the one-time "Sun of the Nations" in the words of Mapam's party newspaper.  Trotsky was far more imperialistic in insisting that the Soviet Union should undermine democratic capitalist regimes all over the world, whereas Stalin was content just with mass murdering Soviet Union citizens, and later lots of Poles and other Eastern Europeans.  

Trotsky also was of the opinion that Jews should simply commit mass national suicide and mass assimilate into the surroundings.  Dahan argues that this is what makes him so attractive to the leftist chattering classes in Israel today.  Trotsky showed his "progressiveness" by displaying self-hatred and anti-Semitism and supporting those seeking to annihilate the Jews.  Just like our own local Post-Zionists.  And the Israeli leftists are all being sustained by the busybodies and anti-Semites from the EU. Go to fullsize image 

Dahan then goes on to list the many examples of activist organization on the Israeli Left that are driven by little more than Trotsky-like Jewish anti-Semitism, or what Dahan calls Beilinite Trotskyism.  The far-Leftist pseudo-academics in Israeli universities are no better.

Trotsky in need of ACAMOL after meeting up with an ice pick:

Years ago, a student asked me if I could explain to him the difference between a Trotskyite and a Trotskyist.  I replied that it was exactly the same as the diffence between a pile of cow manure and a pile of bull manure.

So can anyone explain what the difference is between Israel's Trotskyite Post-Zionist pseudo-academics and the David-Irving-Ernst-Zundel movement?




Nisan 3, 5767, 3/22/2007

Is the AJCommittee now Promoting the "Apartheid" Lie?

by Steven Plaut


Non-Eliminationist Blood Libels?
Is the American Jewish Committee now Promoting the "Apartheid Israel" Libel?

You know how the very liberal American Jewish Comnittee has a rep among the moonbats for being rightwing? It is because the AJCommittee nominally sponsors Commentary Magazine.

Well, now it appears that the AJCommittee is jumping on the Bash-Israel Bandwagon and endorsing some of those assertions that Israel is an apartheid regime. At least so says the Meretz USA web site here:

"Among the guest speakers who dropped by briefly, were Columbia U. president Lee Bollinger (an impressively thoughtful individual) and Todd Gitlin (the 60s-era radical and today's prominent liberal academic)....
The major distinction that was made is between those who use the Apartheid analogy for 'eliminationist' or 'unconscionable' purposes - with the intend of undermining Israel;s existence as a Jewish state - and those (like Carter) who employ the analogy for 'conscionable' reasons, to eliminate the inhumane hardships and injustices that the Palestinians endure under occupation. The main difference of opinion seemed to be on whether to simply refute or dismiss the Apartheid analogy or to allow the truth of valid criticisms of Israeli policies. In the end, there was consensus that a good response to the Apartheid analogy can be a nuanced statement that would contain the following elements: 'Apartheid is not the issue' but the issue includes ending settlement expansion and occupation on the one side and the need to end violence and terror on the other."


Israel of course is the only Middle East regime that is NOT an apartheid regime. So non-eliminationist assertions that Israel is an apartheid regime are suddenly kosher for the AJCommittee members? Maybe the AJCommittee will next claim - non-eliminationally of course - that Israel was behind the 911 attacks on the US? Or that Jews drink gentile blood for Passover?

Want to tell the AJCommittee heads what you think?
Contact:
American Jewish Committee
P.O. Box 705
New York, NY 10150
(212) 751-4000
Fax (212) 891-1450
E. Robert Goodkind, President
David A. Harris, Executive Director
pr@ajc.org
with more officers listed here:




Nisan 3, 5767, 3/22/2007

They Don't Mean "Jews," Do They?

by Nissan Ratzlav-Katz

In 2004, Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu, Chief Rabbi of Tzfat and son of former Israeli Chief Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu, advised against the sale or rent of an apartment in Israel to Arabs. Earlier, following a terrorist attack in the Tzfat region in which several Arab Israeli students were indirectly involved, he had called for barring Arabs from the Tzfat College.
 
Rabbi Eliyahu was indicted for racist incitement following complaints by human rights organizations and the Reform movement.

In 2005, activist David Haivri was sentenced to four months in prison, commuted to community service, for the crime of racist incitement after producing and selling shirts bearing the slogan "No Arabs - No Terrorist Attacks."

Fast forward to March 2007.
 
Jews purchase a building in the ancient city of Hevron from an Arab owner and a group of students move in. The transaction is legal and documented, and Hevron Jewish community spokesman Noam Arnon says at least 20 families will live in the building once renovations are completed.

But the Israeli "human rights organization" called B'tselem is opposed to the idea of selling or renting apartments to Jews in Hevron. Or, as it was put by B'tselem spokeswoman Sarit Michaeli, "Our opposition in principle is that these settlements should be evacuated anyway and that there shouldn't be these pockets in Hebron."

By "pockets," of course, she means "pockets of Jews."

According to B'tzelem, the legality of the purchase by Jewish owners is irrelevant and "the IDF has the obligation to make sure that settlers don't take over more areas."
According to B'tzelem, the legality of the purchase by Jewish owners is irrelevant.

By "settlers," of course, she means "Jews."

This "racist incitement" is especially disappointing coming from a group that claims to defend human rights in Judea, Samaria and Gaza. Disappointing, but not unexpected. (Has anyone read B'tselem's reports on the human rights violations in the Palestinian Authority-controlled areas of the Gaza Strip since Israel withdrew its army and civilians from Gush Katif in 2005?)

A Knesset member of the far-left Meretz-Yahad faction expressed similar views, saying that the issue is not whether the property was legally bought, but the need for the separation of populations. He called upon the government "to throw them out of there fast."

By "them," of course, he means "Jews."

Finally, the head of the Temporary International Presence in Hebron (TIPH), Karl-Henrik Sjursen, said that the presence of Jews in another dwelling in Hevron may be seen by the Arabs as "an unnecessary provocation."

By "provocation," of course, he means.... Well, he said it pretty straightforwardly didn't he?

Who will charge Michaeli, Oron and Sjursen with "racist incitement"? Nobody. You see, when those groups talk about "human rights," there is an asterisk next to the word "human". And down at the bottom of the page, in small letters, is a little footnote. It says:

* By "human," of course, we do not mean "Jews."


First | 2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |36 |37 |38 |39 |40 |41 |42 |43 |44 |45 |46 |47 |48 |49 |50 |51 |52 |53 |54 |55 |56 |57 |58 |59 |60 |61 |62 |63 |64 |65 |66 |67 |68 |69 |70 |71 |72 |73 |

Back to Sanity

by Arutz 7 Analysts
This is how we return to sanity - by listening to good people.
Email Me

Subscribe to this blog’s RSS feed

Insightful and analytical, passionate and authentic, with biting wit and masterful writing - our bloggers are a source of crystal clarity in this time of confusion.