He Ru Follow us: Make a7 your Homepage
      Back to Sanity
      by Arutz 7 Analysts
      This is how we return to sanity - by listening to good people.
      Email Me
      Subscribe to this blog’s RSS feed

      Insightful and analytical, passionate and authentic, with biting wit and masterful writing - our bloggers are a source of crystal clarity in this time of confusion.


      Nisan 7, 5767, 3/26/2007

      Jpost Breaking News: Putin and Hu Jintao To Homesh!


      If you glanced at the Jerusalem Post homepage Monday evening, you would find the following main picture and caption:

      Look closely at the above Jpost pic & caption
       

      It appears that world leaders are beginning to internalize the message of Israel's pioneering settlement movement. Following a great awakening, they have connected to the undercurrents of the Jewish Nation's yearning for the complete return to Zion. According to the caption, Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Chinese counterpart have joined the determined marchers to rebuild Homesh.

      It just goes to show that through persistence in our struggle to maintain Israel's territorial integrity, the IDF backs down, and then world leaders begin to understand. (Hat tip to A7 News Writer Hana Julian)

       


      Nisan 6, 5767, 3/25/2007

      Trotskyite Trash in Israel

      by Steven Plaut

      Alon Dahan is one of the best columnists in Israel.  He often writes on the NFC.CO.IL web site.

      Today he has a must-read article there, available only in Hebrew, entitled "The Trotskyist Revolution is On".  He begins by noting that most people in Israel, at least outside of certain pseudo-academic post-Zionist circles, understand that Stalin was an evil genocidal dictator.  But for some reason, Leon Trotsky has always been regarded with a bit of forgiving admiration by the members of Israel's intelligentsia and Moonbatocracy.  

      Dahan's article is as sharp as the ice pick of a Stalinist agent.  He argues that if anything Trotsky was more radical and pro-violence than Uncle Joe Stalin, the one-time "Sun of the Nations" in the words of Mapam's party newspaper.  Trotsky was far more imperialistic in insisting that the Soviet Union should undermine democratic capitalist regimes all over the world, whereas Stalin was content just with mass murdering Soviet Union citizens, and later lots of Poles and other Eastern Europeans.  

      Trotsky also was of the opinion that Jews should simply commit mass national suicide and mass assimilate into the surroundings.  Dahan argues that this is what makes him so attractive to the leftist chattering classes in Israel today.  Trotsky showed his "progressiveness" by displaying self-hatred and anti-Semitism and supporting those seeking to annihilate the Jews.  Just like our own local Post-Zionists.  And the Israeli leftists are all being sustained by the busybodies and anti-Semites from the EU. Go to fullsize image 

      Dahan then goes on to list the many examples of activist organization on the Israeli Left that are driven by little more than Trotsky-like Jewish anti-Semitism, or what Dahan calls Beilinite Trotskyism.  The far-Leftist pseudo-academics in Israeli universities are no better.

      Trotsky in need of ACAMOL after meeting up with an ice pick:

      Years ago, a student asked me if I could explain to him the difference between a Trotskyite and a Trotskyist.  I replied that it was exactly the same as the diffence between a pile of cow manure and a pile of bull manure.

      So can anyone explain what the difference is between Israel's Trotskyite Post-Zionist pseudo-academics and the David-Irving-Ernst-Zundel movement?



      Nisan 3, 5767, 3/22/2007

      Is the AJCommittee now Promoting the "Apartheid" Lie?

      by Steven Plaut


      Non-Eliminationist Blood Libels?
      Is the American Jewish Committee now Promoting the "Apartheid Israel" Libel?

      You know how the very liberal American Jewish Comnittee has a rep among the moonbats for being rightwing? It is because the AJCommittee nominally sponsors Commentary Magazine.

      Well, now it appears that the AJCommittee is jumping on the Bash-Israel Bandwagon and endorsing some of those assertions that Israel is an apartheid regime. At least so says the Meretz USA web site here:

      "Among the guest speakers who dropped by briefly, were Columbia U. president Lee Bollinger (an impressively thoughtful individual) and Todd Gitlin (the 60s-era radical and today's prominent liberal academic)....
      The major distinction that was made is between those who use the Apartheid analogy for 'eliminationist' or 'unconscionable' purposes - with the intend of undermining Israel;s existence as a Jewish state - and those (like Carter) who employ the analogy for 'conscionable' reasons, to eliminate the inhumane hardships and injustices that the Palestinians endure under occupation. The main difference of opinion seemed to be on whether to simply refute or dismiss the Apartheid analogy or to allow the truth of valid criticisms of Israeli policies. In the end, there was consensus that a good response to the Apartheid analogy can be a nuanced statement that would contain the following elements: 'Apartheid is not the issue' but the issue includes ending settlement expansion and occupation on the one side and the need to end violence and terror on the other."


      Israel of course is the only Middle East regime that is NOT an apartheid regime. So non-eliminationist assertions that Israel is an apartheid regime are suddenly kosher for the AJCommittee members? Maybe the AJCommittee will next claim - non-eliminationally of course - that Israel was behind the 911 attacks on the US? Or that Jews drink gentile blood for Passover?

      Want to tell the AJCommittee heads what you think?
      Contact:
      American Jewish Committee
      P.O. Box 705
      New York, NY 10150
      (212) 751-4000
      Fax (212) 891-1450
      E. Robert Goodkind, President
      David A. Harris, Executive Director
      pr@ajc.org
      with more officers listed here:



      Nisan 3, 5767, 3/22/2007

      They Don't Mean "Jews," Do They?


      In 2004, Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu, Chief Rabbi of Tzfat and son of former Israeli Chief Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu, advised against the sale or rent of an apartment in Israel to Arabs. Earlier, following a terrorist attack in the Tzfat region in which several Arab Israeli students were indirectly involved, he had called for barring Arabs from the Tzfat College.
       
      Rabbi Eliyahu was indicted for racist incitement following complaints by human rights organizations and the Reform movement.

      In 2005, activist David Haivri was sentenced to four months in prison, commuted to community service, for the crime of racist incitement after producing and selling shirts bearing the slogan "No Arabs - No Terrorist Attacks."

      Fast forward to March 2007.
       
      Jews purchase a building in the ancient city of Hevron from an Arab owner and a group of students move in. The transaction is legal and documented, and Hevron Jewish community spokesman Noam Arnon says at least 20 families will live in the building once renovations are completed.

      But the Israeli "human rights organization" called B'tselem is opposed to the idea of selling or renting apartments to Jews in Hevron. Or, as it was put by B'tselem spokeswoman Sarit Michaeli, "Our opposition in principle is that these settlements should be evacuated anyway and that there shouldn't be these pockets in Hebron."

      By "pockets," of course, she means "pockets of Jews."

      According to B'tzelem, the legality of the purchase by Jewish owners is irrelevant and "the IDF has the obligation to make sure that settlers don't take over more areas."
      According to B'tzelem, the legality of the purchase by Jewish owners is irrelevant.

      By "settlers," of course, she means "Jews."

      This "racist incitement" is especially disappointing coming from a group that claims to defend human rights in Judea, Samaria and Gaza. Disappointing, but not unexpected. (Has anyone read B'tselem's reports on the human rights violations in the Palestinian Authority-controlled areas of the Gaza Strip since Israel withdrew its army and civilians from Gush Katif in 2005?)

      A Knesset member of the far-left Meretz-Yahad faction expressed similar views, saying that the issue is not whether the property was legally bought, but the need for the separation of populations. He called upon the government "to throw them out of there fast."

      By "them," of course, he means "Jews."

      Finally, the head of the Temporary International Presence in Hebron (TIPH), Karl-Henrik Sjursen, said that the presence of Jews in another dwelling in Hevron may be seen by the Arabs as "an unnecessary provocation."

      By "provocation," of course, he means.... Well, he said it pretty straightforwardly didn't he?

      Who will charge Michaeli, Oron and Sjursen with "racist incitement"? Nobody. You see, when those groups talk about "human rights," there is an asterisk next to the word "human". And down at the bottom of the page, in small letters, is a little footnote. It says:

      * By "human," of course, we do not mean "Jews."


      Nisan 2, 5767, 3/21/2007

      Klingons Upon You, Rachel Corrie

      by Steven Plaut


      Corried died trying to save a weapons smuggling tunnel from the Israelis and they’re now having a breakfast commemorating her that bans weapons.
      Gotta admit I do not know much about Julia Gorin.  But she got me guffawing with laughter, and not every columnist can do that.

      Gorin has a thing about the Cult of Corrie, those people who have turned Rachel Corrie's suicide into the central canon of their Bash-Israel religion.

      Gorin wrote about Corrie's cult of followers this past summer in Jewish World Review.   She dismissed Corrie as a terrorist rights campaigner and mocked those theaters trying to stage a play about Corrie.  She added: "It's not for nothing that the third anniversary of Corrie's death was commemorated with a salute to her family and friends by the Gaza Community Mental Health Program."

      She has witty comments about other things: "On a side note, the weapons-smuggling tunnels beg a question: One of the Palestinians' grievances against the Israelis is that the IDF security mechanism often interferes with much needed medical supplies or medical care getting to and from the territories. But the Palestinians don't seem to have any trouble getting weapons through. Couldn't they just use their terror tunnels for the medical supplies? What's the problem?"

      Well, Gorin is back this week writing enchantingly about Corrie.  She collects assorted notices about a pancake breakfast being held in Corrie's memory.  In the notice, attendees are encouraged to wear their keffiahs, and to dress in black.  No weapons, drugs, or alcohol please.  Really.

      Corrie is commonly referred to in some web sites as "Saint Pancake".   Gorin cites Michael Becker:

      'I’m at a loss for words. Rachel died trying to save a weapons smuggling tunnel from the Israelis and you’re having a breakfast commemorating her that bans weapons.'

      Another writes: "The Palestinians are a people with far less claim to historical legitimacy than the Klingons. Idiots like Rachel Corrie are like geeks who go to summer camp to learn to speak Klingon, but wind up playing with live phaser guns."

      Go here to read the rest.    Here is my guru Gorin:



      page: 1 | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45