Op-Ed: When a Ceasefire is not a Ceasefire
In the current conflagration between Israel and Gaza, news agencies mistakenly report that the a “cease fire” with Hamas is being discussed, being implemented, kept by our side, broken by theirs.
In the imagination of the media, such a “cease fire” might result in the kind of armistice that ended hostilities in World War I, on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the eleventh month - November 11 1918 - paving the way to the Versailles peace treaty and the genesis of the League of Nations.
However, the three Arabic nuanced terms being discussed with Hamas as a resolution to the current situation have nothing to do with a “cease fire”:
Those terms are Hudna, Tahadiyya and Hudaybiyyah.
All three terms imply continued war, after a respite.
• Hudna - a tactical pause intended only for rearmament, a temporary respite in the war between Islamic forces and non-Islamic forces.
The authoritative Islamic Encyclopedia (London, 1922) defines hudna as a "temporary treaty" which can be approved or abrogated by Islamic religious leaders, depending on whether or not it serves the interests of Islam; a hudna cannot last for more than 10 years.
• Tahadiyya - a temporary halt in hostile activity which can be violated at any time
• Hudaybiyya - An understanding that there will be no fighting for 10 years, named for the “treaty of Hudaybiyyah” in 628 AD.
The Islamic Encyclopedia mentions the Hudaybiyya treaty as an “ultimate hudna”.
The late PLO leader Yasser Arafat often referred to “a hudna” in his speeches when he defined and described the nature of the Oslo Accords.
In the words of the Islamic Encyclopedia, "The Hudaybi[yy]a treaty, concluded by the Prophet Mohammad with the unbelievers of Mecca in 628, provided a precedent for subsequent treaties which the Prophet's successors made with non-Muslims. Mohammad made a hudna with a tribe of Jews back then to give him time to grow his forces, then broke the treaty and wiped them out. Although this treaty was violated within three years from the time that it was concluded, most jurists concur that the maximum period of peace with the enemy should not exceed ten years, since it was originally agreed that the Hudaybi[yy]a treaty should last ten years."
Hudna, Tahadia and Hudaybiyya – the only options on the table with Hamas - do not compare to the "mu’ahada" treaty of peace that Egypt signed with Israel in 1979, or the mu’ahada treaty of peace that Jordan signed with Israel in 1994.
How many people remember that three hudnas already occurred with regard to Gaza?
How many people remember what occurred during those 'hudnas”'?
The people in Sderot and the Negev region of Israel remember.
Let us refresh our memories.
From November 26, 2006, until May 15, 2007, a Hudna between Hamas and Israel was in effect for almost six months.
Five days before the hudna went into effect, Hamas made the following statement: "Hamas's military wing will stop the rocket fire when residents evacuate the city of Sderot." (November 21, 2006)
During that hudna, Gazans launched 315 missiles targeted at Sderot and the western Negev, according to an IDF spokesman.
And there was another hudna with Gaza which lasted until the end of December 2008, which witnessed 878 attacks fired from Gaza.
And there was a hudna from the end of Operation Cast Lead on January 18, 2009, to the first day of Operation Pillar of Defense on November 12, 2012.
During that period, approximately 2,000 rockets and missiles were fired from Gaza, sending one million Israelis running to shelters
And from the end of operation 'Pillar of Defense', through June 30th 2014, 300 aerial attacks were launched from Gaza towards southern Israel- during yet another tenuous Hudna.
What country would tolerate one missile fired into its territory...and agree to a Hudna, Tahadia and Hudaybiyyah that promises yet more aerial attacks?
(Philadelphia attorney Beryl Dean contributed to this report)